Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe it.

The family wouldn't know what Trump said because it wasn't said in their presence. The article says he said it to Mark Meadows. Names are in fact named.

Mark Meadows says it didn’t happen.

Who else was in the room?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Meadows and Kash Patel lie all the effing time just like Trump so their denials are for sh|t.

But the unnamed anonymous sources are completely trustworthy and truthful? How do you know they are? Who are they? Why won’t they go on the record?

Why won't they go on record? Are you serious? Because you MAGAs would doxx them and engage in death threats against them and their loved ones. Heck, Trump is promising to do the same against anyone that votes for Harris.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Meadows and Kash Patel lie all the effing time just like Trump so their denials are for sh|t.

But the unnamed anonymous sources are completely trustworthy and truthful? How do you know they are? Who are they? Why won’t they go on the record?

Why won't they go on record? Are you serious? Because you MAGAs would doxx them and engage in death threats against them and their loved ones. Heck, Trump is promising to do the same against anyone that votes for Harris.

Sure. The majority of people will believe Vanessa’s sister and see that she supports Trump to the extent she voted for him.

You can vote for the fake mcdonald’s worker who did fries. pathetic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With Trump threatening to eradicate “the enemy within” defined as people who don’t agree with him … well, maybe that explains unnamed sources.

Maybe they are no sources and it’s a hit piece because Trump is doing well and Kamala is not.

Dragging the family of a dead Soldier is a travesty and democrats have no conscience.

“Losers” and “suckers” and “it doesn’t cost $60,000 to bury a ____ing Mexican.”

You may hate the military and you show it in your Trump support, but Democrats do not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Meadows and Kash Patel lie all the effing time just like Trump so their denials are for sh|t.

But the unnamed anonymous sources are completely trustworthy and truthful? How do you know they are? Who are they? Why won’t they go on the record?

Why won't they go on record? Are you serious? Because you MAGAs would doxx them and engage in death threats against them and their loved ones. Heck, Trump is promising to do the same against anyone that votes for Harris.

Trump knows who he said it to, so he’ll tell.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With Trump threatening to eradicate “the enemy within” defined as people who don’t agree with him … well, maybe that explains unnamed sources.

Maybe they are no sources and it’s a hit piece because Trump is doing well and Kamala is not.

Dragging the family of a dead Soldier is a travesty and democrats have no conscience.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In april 2020, Vanessa Guillén, a 20-year-old Army private, was bludgeoned to death by a fellow soldier at Fort Hood, in Texas. The killer, aided by his girlfriend, burned Guillén’s body. Guillén’s remains were discovered two months later, buried in a riverbank near the base, after a massive search.

Guillén, the daughter of Mexican immigrants, grew up in Houston, and her murder sparked outrage across Texas and beyond. Fort Hood had become known as a particularly perilous assignment for female soldiers, and members of Congress took up the cause of reform. Shortly after her remains were discovered, President Donald Trump himself invited the Guillén family to the White House. With Guillén’s mother seated beside him, Trump spent 25 minutes with the family as television cameras recorded the scene.
In the meeting, Trump maintained a dignified posture and expressed sympathy to Guillén’s mother. “I saw what happened to your daughter Vanessa, who was a spectacular person, and respected and loved by everybody, including in the military,” Trump said. Later in the conversation, he made a promise: “If I can help you out with the funeral, I’ll help—I’ll help you with that,” he said. “I’ll help you out. Financially, I’ll help you.”
…

At a certain point, according to two people present at the meeting, Trump asked, “Did they bill us for the funeral? What did it cost?”

According to attendees, and to contemporaneous notes of the meeting taken by a participant, an aide answered: Yes, we received a bill; the funeral cost $60,000.

Trump became angry. “It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a fxxxing Mexican!” He turned to his chief of staff, Mark Meadows, and issued an order: “Don’t pay it!” Later that day, he was still agitated. “Can you believe it?” he said, according to a witness. “Fxxxing people, trying to rip me off.”

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/10/trump-military-generals-hitler/680327/

Trump is a monstrosity. He is a disgrace to the office of the president. I am so pissed off.

Democrats are so darn gullible. Then again they are still going on about Russiagate and Jan6.

Anonymous wrote:Shortly after I emailed a series of questions to a Trump spokesperson, Alex Pfeiffer, I received an email from Khawam, who asked me to publish a statement from Mayra Guillén, Vanessa’s sister. Pfeiffer then emailed me the same statement. “I am beyond grateful for all the support President Donald Trump showed our family during a trying time,” the statement reads. “I witnessed firsthand how President Trump honors our nation’s heroes’ service. We are grateful for everything he has done and continues to do to support our troops.”

The family’s statement supports Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Meadows and Kash Patel lie all the effing time just like Trump so their denials are for sh|t.

But the unnamed anonymous sources are completely trustworthy and truthful? How do you know they are? Who are they? Why won’t they go on the record?

Why won't they go on record? Are you serious? Because you MAGAs would doxx them and engage in death threats against them and their loved ones. Heck, Trump is promising to do the same against anyone that votes for Harris.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Meadows and Kash Patel lie all the effing time just like Trump so their denials are for sh|t.

But the unnamed anonymous sources are completely trustworthy and truthful? How do you know they are? Who are they? Why won’t they go on the record?

Why won't they go on record? Are you serious? Because you MAGAs would doxx them and engage in death threats against them and their loved ones. Heck, Trump is promising to do the same against anyone that votes for Harris.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I posted the other thread on this. I haven’t said anything on FB this year, but this did it for me. How can you be the party of patriots and permit this?

Because according to the sister of Vanessa, it’s false and exploitative of her sister’s life and memory.

I believe the sister, who voted for Donald Trump.

You believe unnamed and anonymous sources who won’t even publicly allow themselves to be quoted.

You believe a sister who wasn't in the room? Good for you. Maybe you should go back to school and learn critical thinking.

You believe anonymous sources?

Yes, I completely believe Vanessa’s sister. 100%. I believe Vanessa’s family. Her family isn’t “random.”

Anonymous sources are the very definition of random and impossible to prove.

She has as much credibility as you do. None. She wasn't there. It's tragic what happened to her sister. But that doesn't make her a credible source. You need to learn critical thinking.

How do we know if the anonymous sources are credible?

I believe her sister has more credibility than me, the Atlantic, or anonymous source. We don’t even know who they are. Why won’t they go on the record?

I'm willing to give an institution that has been around for 150+ years that has been a bastion of journalistic integrity before I'll extend the same credulousness to a random sibling WHO WASN'T THERE!

Why won’t they document who was in the room and why won’t they name their sources?

Because if a publication with an ounce of integrity or reputation names sources that requested anonymity betrays that request they never get another tip or lead or job application from a decent journalist ever again.

Do you really not understand how journalism works? What am I talking about, of course you don't. You're a Trump supporter, you don't understand how anything works

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Meadows and Kash Patel lie all the effing time just like Trump so their denials are for sh|t.

But the unnamed anonymous sources are completely trustworthy and truthful? How do you know they are? Who are they? Why won’t they go on the record?

Anonymous wrote:With Trump threatening to eradicate “the enemy within” defined as people who don’t agree with him … well, maybe that explains unnamed sources.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I posted the other thread on this. I haven’t said anything on FB this year, but this did it for me. How can you be the party of patriots and permit this?

Because according to the sister of Vanessa, it’s false and exploitative of her sister’s life and memory.

I believe the sister, who voted for Donald Trump.

You believe unnamed and anonymous sources who won’t even publicly allow themselves to be quoted.

You believe a sister who wasn't in the room? Good for you. Maybe you should go back to school and learn critical thinking.

You believe anonymous sources?

Yes, I completely believe Vanessa’s sister. 100%. I believe Vanessa’s family. Her family isn’t “random.”

Anonymous sources are the very definition of random and impossible to prove.

She has as much credibility as you do. None. She wasn't there. It's tragic what happened to her sister. But that doesn't make her a credible source. You need to learn critical thinking.

How do we know if the anonymous sources are credible?

I believe her sister has more credibility than me, the Atlantic, or anonymous source. We don’t even know who they are. Why won’t they go on the record?

I'm willing to give an institution that has been around for 150+ years that has been a bastion of journalistic integrity before I'll extend the same credulousness to a random sibling WHO WASN'T THERE!

Why won’t they document who was in the room and why won’t they name their sources?

Anonymous wrote:

In april 2020, Vanessa Guillén, a 20-year-old Army private, was bludgeoned to death by a fellow soldier at Fort Hood, in Texas. The killer, aided by his girlfriend, burned Guillén’s body. Guillén’s remains were discovered two months later, buried in a riverbank near the base, after a massive search.

Guillén, the daughter of Mexican immigrants, grew up in Houston, and her murder sparked outrage across Texas and beyond. Fort Hood had become known as a particularly perilous assignment for female soldiers, and members of Congress took up the cause of reform. Shortly after her remains were discovered, President Donald Trump himself invited the Guillén family to the White House. With Guillén’s mother seated beside him, Trump spent 25 minutes with the family as television cameras recorded the scene.
In the meeting, Trump maintained a dignified posture and expressed sympathy to Guillén’s mother. “I saw what happened to your daughter Vanessa, who was a spectacular person, and respected and loved by everybody, including in the military,” Trump said. Later in the conversation, he made a promise: “If I can help you out with the funeral, I’ll help—I’ll help you with that,” he said. “I’ll help you out. Financially, I’ll help you.”
…

At a certain point, according to two people present at the meeting, Trump asked, “Did they bill us for the funeral? What did it cost?”

According to attendees, and to contemporaneous notes of the meeting taken by a participant, an aide answered: Yes, we received a bill; the funeral cost $60,000.

Trump became angry. “It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a fxxxing Mexican!” He turned to his chief of staff, Mark Meadows, and issued an order: “Don’t pay it!” Later that day, he was still agitated. “Can you believe it?” he said, according to a witness. “Fxxxing people, trying to rip me off.”

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/10/trump-military-generals-hitler/680327/

He is a disgusting person and has no respect for other humans. Do not let this person close to power again!

Trump is a monstrosity. He is a disgrace to the office of the president. I am so pissed off.