Anonymous wrote:Vienna notoriously tries to break the rules in county select. They are terrible.
Anonymous wrote:Girls county basketball can be a real mess. I have a DD on a 5th grade team, and we were doing great until we played the Vienna 5th grade teams (Vienna has two teams, and they are in first and second place). Both teams are basically AAU teams that have played together for years. They use their two zip code exceptions to bring in AAU girls that are almost too good for their age groups. It is completely one sided when the zip code exceptions go to AAU players.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1 that 2 years on JV is not promising.
I don’t get it. Isn’t JV typically grades 9 and 10?
Basketball (alongside Football and Volleyball) is a sport that offers a Freshmen team in addition to JV and Varsity (at least in FCPS). Because of this, you only generally see Freshmen on JV teams if they're sufficiently advanced that the program believes that they may be able to contribute to success at the Varsity level as a sophomore
In other sports that do not offer a Freshmen team, 2 years (or even 3) on the JV level is not considered to be as underwhelming.
But why would they need to contribute to varsity as a sophomore rather than as a junior? What is the point of putting sophomores on varsity unless you don’t have a sufficient number of good juniors and seniors?
In the situation I’m describing, the sophomores are markedly better than enough of the juniors and/or seniors that they can help the team win by that age. And the head coach foresees that when the player is a freshman.
This still doesn’t answer the question, nor does the response of the PP above you.
It makes literally no sense to write a kid off if he isn’t markedly better than most of the juniors or seniors until he is a junior or senior. One would think this would be obvious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there a site where they keep the scores/standings for the middle school fcps?
Basketball is not a MS sport in FCPS.
For some schools it is this year, and I meant for the schools that do have it this season. Surely they are keeping track of thing somewhere?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1 that 2 years on JV is not promising.
I don’t get it. Isn’t JV typically grades 9 and 10?
Basketball (alongside Football and Volleyball) is a sport that offers a Freshmen team in addition to JV and Varsity (at least in FCPS). Because of this, you only generally see Freshmen on JV teams if they're sufficiently advanced that the program believes that they may be able to contribute to success at the Varsity level as a sophomore
In other sports that do not offer a Freshmen team, 2 years (or even 3) on the JV level is not considered to be as underwhelming.
But why would they need to contribute to varsity as a sophomore rather than as a junior? What is the point of putting sophomores on varsity unless you don’t have a sufficient number of good juniors and seniors?
In the situation I’m describing, the sophomores are markedly better than enough of the juniors and/or seniors that they can help the team win by that age. And the head coach foresees that when the player is a freshman.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there a site where they keep the scores/standings for the middle school fcps?
Basketball is not a MS sport in FCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Is there a site where they keep the scores/standings for the middle school fcps?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1 that 2 years on JV is not promising.
I don’t get it. Isn’t JV typically grades 9 and 10?
Basketball (alongside Football and Volleyball) is a sport that offers a Freshmen team in addition to JV and Varsity (at least in FCPS). Because of this, you only generally see Freshmen on JV teams if they're sufficiently advanced that the program believes that they may be able to contribute to success at the Varsity level as a sophomore
In other sports that do not offer a Freshmen team, 2 years (or even 3) on the JV level is not considered to be as underwhelming.
But why would they need to contribute to varsity as a sophomore rather than as a junior? What is the point of putting sophomores on varsity unless you don’t have a sufficient number of good juniors and seniors?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1 that 2 years on JV is not promising.
I don’t get it. Isn’t JV typically grades 9 and 10?
Basketball (alongside Football and Volleyball) is a sport that offers a Freshmen team in addition to JV and Varsity (at least in FCPS). Because of this, you only generally see Freshmen on JV teams if they're sufficiently advanced that the program believes that they may be able to contribute to success at the Varsity level as a sophomore
In other sports that do not offer a Freshmen team, 2 years (or even 3) on the JV level is not considered to be as underwhelming.
But why would they need to contribute to varsity as a sophomore rather than as a junior? What is the point of putting sophomores on varsity unless you don’t have a sufficient number of good juniors and seniors?