Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Smart, independent minded, creative, studious, sporty: all types. Go visit when students are on campus then go visit UVA. UVA has a lot of people who dress exactly alike, especially females, and wear the same hairstyle. WM does not have the “sheeple” vibe. Uniqueness and individuality are celebrated. The SAT ranges preTO were almost identical: both had 25% above 1480-90 at that time. So both have smart kids , yet neither had the 75% or more above 1480 that the ivy/stanford group had at the time. That makes a more balanced undergraduate group where bright kids can shine rather than be buried by 3x as many bright ones. At least that’s what we sought for ours. YMMV
UVA and VT rejects attend W&M.
UVA: 1470, 60% submitting
W&M: 1470, 60% submitting
VT: 1360, 50% submitting
Someone even found the data for the engineering school at VT and found the average SAT for engineering was the same as the average for the whole school .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Smart, independent minded, creative, studious, sporty: all types. Go visit when students are on campus then go visit UVA. UVA has a lot of people who dress exactly alike, especially females, and wear the same hairstyle. WM does not have the “sheeple” vibe. Uniqueness and individuality are celebrated. The SAT ranges preTO were almost identical: both had 25% above 1480-90 at that time. So both have smart kids , yet neither had the 75% or more above 1480 that the ivy/stanford group had at the time. That makes a more balanced undergraduate group where bright kids can shine rather than be buried by 3x as many bright ones. At least that’s what we sought for ours. YMMV
UVA and VT rejects attend W&M.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Smart, independent minded, creative, studious, sporty: all types. Go visit when students are on campus then go visit UVA. UVA has a lot of people who dress exactly alike, especially females, and wear the same hairstyle. WM does not have the “sheeple” vibe. Uniqueness and individuality are celebrated. The SAT ranges preTO were almost identical: both had 25% above 1480-90 at that time. So both have smart kids , yet neither had the 75% or more above 1480 that the ivy/stanford group had at the time. That makes a more balanced undergraduate group where bright kids can shine rather than be buried by 3x as many bright ones. At least that’s what we sought for ours. YMMV
Wow. Generalize much? I'm glad you think their stats are the same - their rankings are vastly different. Sheeple U continues to outrank W&M in every meaningful way. Glad your kids are enjoying it.
Anonymous wrote:A little bit of a tangent but I'll ask...
Would you ever consider going to a school like Davidson, Wake Forest, Dickinson, or Franklin & Marshall instead of W&M if they were all options? It really does seem more like a private SLAC and so I"m wondering if the private SLAC is worth it if you have in-state tuition at W&M.
Anonymous wrote:
UVA and VT rejects attend W&M.