Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So, DC has been invited to a birthday party where they will be watching a PG 13 movie. It’s a teen movie, with teen themes. If DC were 2 years older, I would be fine with movie. But they’re not.

Is this a case of I need to relax? Or is it worthwhile to censor DC’s movies a few more years?

You don't need to relax, but you also can't expect them to change the movie to accommodate one guest. So you have to accept that this party may not happen for your kid, which is fine.

Agree that it's fine to miss occasionally.

On the flip side, sometimes speaking up reveals other parents have the same concerns. This happened once with a sleepover where I said my kid probably wasn't ready for the movie, so I'd just pick them up after dinnertime. Several parents chimed in on the text thread that actually their kid wasn't up for it either. The party ended up switching movies.

(Eye roll)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So, DC has been invited to a birthday party where they will be watching a PG 13 movie. It’s a teen movie, with teen themes. If DC were 2 years older, I would be fine with movie. But they’re not.

Is this a case of I need to relax? Or is it worthwhile to censor DC’s movies a few more years?

You don't need to relax, but you also can't expect them to change the movie to accommodate one guest. So you have to accept that this party may not happen for your kid, which is fine.

Agree that it's fine to miss occasionally.

On the flip side, sometimes speaking up reveals other parents have the same concerns. This happened once with a sleepover where I said my kid probably wasn't ready for the movie, so I'd just pick them up after dinnertime. Several parents chimed in on the text thread that actually their kid wasn't up for it either. The party ended up switching movies.

Anonymous wrote:

So, DC has been invited to a birthday party where they will be watching a PG 13 movie. It’s a teen movie, with teen themes. If DC were 2 years older, I would be fine with movie. But they’re not.

Is this a case of I need to relax? Or is it worthwhile to censor DC’s movies a few more years?

You don't need to relax, but you also can't expect them to change the movie to accommodate one guest. So you have to accept that this party may not happen for your kid, which is fine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What movie is it? Teenage years is a very wide span of maturity and development, just like the year prior.

I'm probably going to say need to relax, as what constitutes PG/PG13 now is much more prudish that when I was a kid.

That said, your kid is going to MS next year, so you better start getting comfortable with a lot more discussion/topics that you are likely currently avoiding.

Thanks. These are all good points. I am aware that middle school is a year away, but kids will be close to a year older then, right? There’s a gap between 4th and 5th graders, and then 5th and 6th graders. There are definitely, movies I’d let my 5th grader watch, but would not have viewed in 3rd grade. So now I’m looking for the moving kine for a 5th grader.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On the flip side (and slightly off-topic), but parents, please do just a little bit of research on a movie before you let your kids go see it.

I know the general theme here is that its weird for some parents to be so restrictive since the kids talk about this stuff/see it on social media/etc.

But DS has a group of kids that are trying to go see Terrifier and the parents have no idea what the movie is. Its nuts and he's pissed at us bc we're not letting him go

I mean, the title kind of gives you the huge hint it'll be scary.

Yeah, except it doesnt. I would let me freshman watch Scream or The Halloween movies.

But def not those Terrifier movies. Its' unrated, FFS bc they knew if they submitted it for ratings it would be NC-17