Anonymous wrote:Who the eff cares what other clubs do? Sure if ur from that club, complain to ur club about it. But why would anymore care about other clubs do? The only ones who do care obviously care too much about winning. But for real, just focus on your kid and make sure they’re developing and focusing on actions they can control.

Anonymous wrote:Bethesda U14 had two bioband kids. One sometimes starts and plays half the game, the other doesn’t start and plays 1/4 of the game. The club and those parents determined that practicing and playing with the top U14 team is better for their development than playing for the second U15 team or not playing much for the top U15 team. It’s that simple. Please stop whining about Bethesda and biobands, it’s an old story that is no longer accurate (if it ever was besides one team and two players).

Also, whatever quote about “playing to win at all costs” was not from Bethesda.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's be real, all MLSN clubs in the area prioritize winning at u14.

Yes, to some degree, and that might be good if the bigger picture (dev) is considered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:U14

A club prioritizing winning at U14 should lose their accreditation

My bet is Bethesda or SYC.

It's most likely ASA. Their coaching is terrible. Due to performance and other shenanigans, they might lose their MLS next status, as it happened to their GA status.

Not true. My DS is at ASA and they don’t prioritize winning.

If he is on the top team, they prioritize this way and even roster accordingly. There have been awful issues with coaching due to just playing for winning and not having development in mind. There is biobanding, too, as well as guest players in tournaments and league games who entirely replace existing players for the match.

My DS is on the MLSNext team. We are happy with the coaching so far. You can see the results, they aren't really "winning". Are you referring to a specific age group at ASA?

Prioritizing winning and ACTUALLY winning are different things lol.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:U14

A club prioritizing winning at U14 should lose their accreditation

My bet is Bethesda or SYC.

It's most likely ASA. Their coaching is terrible. Due to performance and other shenanigans, they might lose their MLS next status, as it happened to their GA status.

Not true. My DS is at ASA and they don’t prioritize winning.

If he is on the top team, they prioritize this way and even roster accordingly. There have been awful issues with coaching due to just playing for winning and not having development in mind. There is biobanding, too, as well as guest players in tournaments and league games who entirely replace existing players for the match.

My DS is on the MLSNext team. We are happy with the coaching so far. You can see the results, they aren't really "winning". Are you referring to a specific age group at ASA?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:U14

A club prioritizing winning at U14 should lose their accreditation

My bet is Bethesda or SYC.

It's most likely ASA. Their coaching is terrible. Due to performance and other shenanigans, they might lose their MLS next status, as it happened to their GA status.

Not true. My DS is at ASA and they don’t prioritize winning.

If he is on the top team, they prioritize this way and even roster accordingly. There have been awful issues with coaching due to just playing for winning and not having development in mind. There is biobanding, too, as well as guest players in tournaments and league games who entirely replace existing players for the match.

My DS is on the MLSNext team. We are happy with the coaching so far. You can see the results, they aren't really "winning". Are you referring to a specific age group at ASA?

The coach seems ready to retaliate. Please stop, it is not a good look.

You might have a grip on a particular team or coach. Please stop. It doesn't reflect the whole organization.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:U14

A club prioritizing winning at U14 should lose their accreditation

My bet is Bethesda or SYC.

It's most likely ASA. Their coaching is terrible. Due to performance and other shenanigans, they might lose their MLS next status, as it happened to their GA status.

Not true. My DS is at ASA and they don’t prioritize winning.

If he is on the top team, they prioritize this way and even roster accordingly. There have been awful issues with coaching due to just playing for winning and not having development in mind. There is biobanding, too, as well as guest players in tournaments and league games who entirely replace existing players for the match.

My DS is on the MLSNext team. We are happy with the coaching so far. You can see the results, they aren't really "winning". Are you referring to a specific age group at ASA?

The coach seems ready to retaliate. Please stop, it is not a good look.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:U14

A club prioritizing winning at U14 should lose their accreditation

My bet is Bethesda or SYC.

It's most likely ASA. Their coaching is terrible. Due to performance and other shenanigans, they might lose their MLS next status, as it happened to their GA status.

Not true. My DS is at ASA and they don’t prioritize winning.

If he is on the top team, they prioritize this way and even roster accordingly. There have been awful issues with coaching due to just playing for winning and not having development in mind. There is biobanding, too, as well as guest players in tournaments and league games who entirely replace existing players for the match.

Ehhhh, since when Arlington has MLS Next? They play ECNL.

You talking about Arlington?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:U14

A club prioritizing winning at U14 should lose their accreditation

My bet is Bethesda or SYC.

It's most likely ASA. Their coaching is terrible. Due to performance and other shenanigans, they might lose their MLS next status, as it happened to their GA status.

Not true. My DS is at ASA and they don’t prioritize winning.

If he is on the top team, they prioritize this way and even roster accordingly. There have been awful issues with coaching due to just playing for winning and not having development in mind. There is biobanding, too, as well as guest players in tournaments and league games who entirely replace existing players for the match.

My DS is on the MLSNext team. We are happy with the coaching so far. You can see the results, they aren't really "winning". Are you referring to a specific age group at ASA?

Anonymous wrote:Let's be real, all MLSN clubs in the area prioritize winning at u14.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:U14

A club prioritizing winning at U14 should lose their accreditation

My bet is Bethesda or SYC.

It's most likely ASA. Their coaching is terrible. Due to performance and other shenanigans, they might lose their MLS next status, as it happened to their GA status.

Not true. My DS is at ASA and they don’t prioritize winning.

If he is on the top team, they prioritize this way and even roster accordingly. There have been awful issues with coaching due to just playing for winning and not having development in mind. There is biobanding, too, as well as guest players in tournaments and league games who entirely replace existing players for the match.