Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this too and I think it was something his parents did to have him keep his young voice.Anonymous wrote:He didn’t see anything wrong with sharing a bed because he grew up with nine brothers and sisters in a 2 bedroom house.
Michael had plenty of mental health issues especially body dysmorphia but I tend to believe he was more asexual than pedophilic.
His supposed bio kids were not his. He didn’t sleep with Debbie.
I think he mentally thought he was still a kid and didn’t have sexual desire for either women, men, or kids.
I think so too. It has not been proven that he was a pedophile.
Anonymous wrote:I think this too and I think it was something his parents did to have him keep his young voice.Anonymous wrote:He didn’t see anything wrong with sharing a bed because he grew up with nine brothers and sisters in a 2 bedroom house.
Michael had plenty of mental health issues especially body dysmorphia but I tend to believe he was more asexual than pedophilic.
His supposed bio kids were not his. He didn’t sleep with Debbie.
I think he mentally thought he was still a kid and didn’t have sexual desire for either women, men, or kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I see an argument about not supporting an artist you otherwise admire if said support would contribute to him monetarily, Michael Jackson is dead. Buying every song he ever made ten times each would not contribute to supporting him in any way.
Someone can be a terrible person, a criminal, a monster and still make great art. I do not get canceling the art with the artist especially if said artist can’t benefit from it. I judge art, music, and things in general on whether I like it, not whether its creator comports with my morals. Are we going to cancel Apple products because Steve Jobs who’s now dead was a jerk?
His estate which holds the rights to his catalogue still profits from his image and music.
Yes, but his estate is not him. He is dead. You are not supporting a pedophile financially since I doubt he sees any royalties in the afterlife.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I see an argument about not supporting an artist you otherwise admire if said support would contribute to him monetarily, Michael Jackson is dead. Buying every song he ever made ten times each would not contribute to supporting him in any way.
Someone can be a terrible person, a criminal, a monster and still make great art. I do not get canceling the art with the artist especially if said artist can’t benefit from it. I judge art, music, and things in general on whether I like it, not whether its creator comports with my morals. Are we going to cancel Apple products because Steve Jobs who’s now dead was a jerk?
His estate which holds the rights to his catalogue still profits from his image and music.