Anonymous wrote:In a prof and this thread is chilling. Really? Naming minority profs and saying they’re not good enough? This is clearly a right wing troll with an agenda. I hope Jeff deleted the whole thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Academe doesn't pay very well (unless you are at a top school) and expects a lot of work.
You'd think Amherst could get Princeton, Berkeley, Harvard level candidates. Really crazy to see the decline so quickly
They can and do.
There's evidence right here showing they do not. There's people from Iowa teaching at Amherst now for crying out loud!
Truly, the Midwest could not possibly produce a brilliant scholar
Can you name one that isn't in Chicago? I'll wait.
I am a coastal snob and even I know about the University of Michigan and Wash U, to name a few. Go home.
Anonymous wrote: Word on the street is that UCs have the worst faculty recently due to their h3ll hole state being impossible to recruit to. Amherst must be getting the remnants
Anonymous wrote:lol this is hands down the dumbest thread I’ve ever read on DCUM and I’ve read a lot
-R1 full prof
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Academe doesn't pay very well (unless you are at a top school) and expects a lot of work.
You'd think Amherst could get Princeton, Berkeley, Harvard level candidates. Really crazy to see the decline so quickly
They can and do.
There's evidence right here showing they do not. There's people from Iowa teaching at Amherst now for crying out loud!
Truly, the Midwest could not possibly produce a brilliant scholar
Can you name one that isn't in Chicago? I'll wait.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just ran a faculty search for a leading R01 university in engineering. We got 300+ applications (another department got 800) and had to turn away ridiculously amazing applicants. When you said "has the faculty search gotten worse" I was thinking you meant "more competitive for applicants."
Then why not choose the most qualified and best applicants from the best schools. Stop the DEI craze and give people an $80,000 education
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amherst has hit bottom. Stay away!!!
Is this true? My kid is looking to apply.
Of course not. Amherst and Williams are the top two LACs, on a prestige level of T15s, by anyone who knows anything. It is a feeder(tier 1) to top med schools and is a top phD feeder too. Graduates are highly respected. Ignore PP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Academe doesn't pay very well (unless you are at a top school) and expects a lot of work.
You'd think Amherst could get Princeton, Berkeley, Harvard level candidates. Really crazy to see the decline so quickly
They can and do.
There's evidence right here showing they do not. There's people from Iowa teaching at Amherst now for crying out loud!
Truly, the Midwest could not possibly produce a brilliant scholar
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe Amherst is getting what it deserves: look at how many of those people are in crappy VAP or lecturer positions compared to tenure track.
What's that supposed to mean? Amherst is getting what it budgets for, which is not permanent positions. In which case you all REALLY need to give these people a break, no mid-career scholar with multiple books is going to move for a VAP.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe Amherst is getting what it deserves: look at how many of those people are in crappy VAP or lecturer positions compared to tenure track.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Academe doesn't pay very well (unless you are at a top school) and expects a lot of work.
You'd think Amherst could get Princeton, Berkeley, Harvard level candidates. Really crazy to see the decline so quickly
They can and do.
There's evidence right here showing they do not. There's people from Iowa teaching at Amherst now for crying out loud!
