Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a fan. If you must, smaller is better than bigger and less is better than more.

Total opposite.

Small, hidden tattoos are stupid. They age poorly and are difficult to see.

If you're gonna do, be bold. Outlines, color, and a clear subject matter.

Bold is best. I saw this hot lady (looked older than me but not more than 45) at the gym over the weekend. She had a sweet neck tattoo. Not typically my go to per say but something about it was really hot.

She's gotta be kinky as hell if she's doing ink like that.

I prefer aged tattoos over the fake perfect botox plastic look.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a fan. If you must, smaller is better than bigger and less is better than more.

Total opposite.

Small, hidden tattoos are stupid. They age poorly and are difficult to see.

If you're gonna do, be bold. Outlines, color, and a clear subject matter.

Bold is best. I saw this hot lady (looked older than me but not more than 45) at the gym over the weekend. She had a sweet neck tattoo. Not typically my go to per say but something about it was really hot.

Exactly. If you're gonna do it, go for it. Big and bold. Make sure that people across the room can actually make out what your tattoo is. If they gotta get close to see what it is, its a bad tattoo

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a fan. If you must, smaller is better than bigger and less is better than more.

Total opposite.

Small, hidden tattoos are stupid. They age poorly and are difficult to see.

If you're gonna do, be bold. Outlines, color, and a clear subject matter.

Bold is best. I saw this hot lady (looked older than me but not more than 45) at the gym over the weekend. She had a sweet neck tattoo. Not typically my go to per say but something about it was really hot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a fan. If you must, smaller is better than bigger and less is better than more.

Total opposite.

Small, hidden tattoos are stupid. They age poorly and are difficult to see.

If you're gonna do, be bold. Outlines, color, and a clear subject matter.

Bonus points if you include the eyelids as part of moving tableau.

I’ve actually been wondering about this. Just recently I’ve seen a surprising number of late 30s-early 40s women who look otherwise very professional and $$$, but with full arm sleeve tattoos. I don’t recall ever seeing anything like this in the Boston area where we moved from. Is this a recent development, or just something regional? Or am I just somehow noticing them?

Anonymous wrote:There is a mom at my kid’s daycare that has basically her entire body covered in Tattoos. I honestly get why people get small tattoos for something every meaningful in their life-but when it’s multiple/over the top to me it just screams “look at me! Look how unique and interesting I am.” And like other have stated-I just think about how much money they spent on them when that money could have gone to much more useful things.

Meh. (Disclosure: I've spent around 18k on my tattoos)

And I have found it a better use of my money than a vacation. The tattoos are permanent; a vacation is not.

And for me, I love art. I buy art. I make art. And I love wearing art on my body. I am patient to get the artist I want. I spend a lot to get quality work. And at the end of the day, I am thrilled with how I spent my money. Do you criticize the same people that spend thousands on a luxury car? Or men that spends thousands on obscure hobbies or collections? It brings people happiness.

And while I agree that that there are MANY bad tattoos out there, you have to recognize that there is a lot of beautiful art work on skin. These are not my tattoos but I do have tattoos by some of these artists. It is money well spent, imo. They may not be your preferred style, but it's disingenuous to claim that its not art

Anonymous wrote:Not a fan. If you must, smaller is better than bigger and less is better than more.

Total opposite.

Small, hidden tattoos are stupid. They age poorly and are difficult to see.

If you're gonna do, be bold. Outlines, color, and a clear subject matter.

Anonymous wrote:Not a fan. If you must, smaller is better than bigger and less is better than more.

And zero is better than less.

This thread is sooooo b00mer.

Anonymous wrote:Better than bottle blondes.

Hair color can easily be changed. Permanant ink? Not so much.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men what do you think about tattoos on women? Indicative that they won't make a good wife?

Please explain your logic? Do men with tattoos not make good husbands?

My husband has 2 and he is an amazing husband and father.

I don’t have any and don’t want any, but I like them on my DH.

There is a mom at my kid’s daycare that has basically her entire body covered in Tattoos. I honestly get why people get small tattoos for something every meaningful in their life-but when it’s multiple/over the top to me it just screams “look at me! Look how unique and interesting I am.” And like other have stated-I just think about how much money they spent on them when that money could have gone to much more useful things.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can deal with one or two on a man just fine but more than that tells me that’s they have different priorities in life and that’s where the money goes (and will continue to go).

So you think they will just get more and more tattoos or is there something else you wouldn't like?

Again, it’s priorities, even values. Several intricate tattoos can cost thousands of dollars. To me, that’s a vacation or money that can go towards a degree. $5k towards inking up your body is a statement.

Anonymous wrote:I can deal with one or two on a man just fine but more than that tells me that’s they have different priorities in life and that’s where the money goes (and will continue to go).

So you think they will just get more and more tattoos or is there something else you wouldn't like?