Anonymous wrote:Slowly working toward year round schooling with no weeks where children go all 5 days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They do serve summer meals.
https://www.fcps.edu/family-resources/student-safety-and-wellness/food-and-nutrition-programs/summer-meal-service
DP, I think the PP was trying to say that this service should not be the responsibility of the school system.
I believe the summer meals aren’t administered by the school system but are just distributed at schools and other community sites.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They do serve summer meals.
https://www.fcps.edu/family-resources/student-safety-and-wellness/food-and-nutrition-programs/summer-meal-service
DP, I think the PP was trying to say that this service should not be the responsibility of the school system.
Anonymous wrote:They do serve summer meals.
https://www.fcps.edu/family-resources/student-safety-and-wellness/food-and-nutrition-programs/summer-meal-service
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The calendar seems longer than when I was a kid… maybe by about 2-3 weeks? My memory isn’t great though. I wonder what teachers think of the shortened summers? That always seemed like the best perk of the job.
As someone whose DD starts with FCPS this fall...teachers are paid as contract employees based on days - usually 195-day contracted employees - they get paid once a month and have to ensure they budget correctly because they don't get paid the "summer" months. So this might have something to do with it. Although I also see it as a downside because they'd have less summertime to get a 2nd job which many teachers do.
Also - remember...not all of FCPS is UMC - there are many and probably a lot more now (we all know the woes of overcrowded schools) who are on free or reduced lunch programs and these students are the ones who truly suffer with extended summer breaks.
Anonymous wrote:Slowly working toward year round schooling with no weeks where children go all 5 days.
Anonymous wrote:Can we please, please push for the 9 weeks on, 2 weeks off schedule that gives us a 7 week summer break?
Start in August and go through 9 weeks for Q1, and then have 2 weeks off in October. Back in school for 9 weeks for Q2 (with 3 days off at Thanksgiving), and then 2.5 weeks off in Dec/Jan. Back in school for 9 weeks for Q3, and then 2 weeks off in the spring. One last 9 week session for Q4 with a 7 week summer.
That has an extra 10 days built in for random holidays, like 4-day Labor Day and Memorial Day weekends, Election Day, MLK Day, religious holidays, and so on.
Pretty please?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People suggesting multiple weeks long breaks throughout the year are delusional. How much in a bubble are you that you think everyone else has the time and money to travel during those times? Talk about inequitable. The kids whose parents can’t afford to travel need childcare and there is no one to staff it when college students are not available. Not to mention many teachers would hate this schedule. It would push even more of them out of the profession. Who wants to deal with re-acclimating a classroom full of kids after several weeks off multiple times per year? People here think only of their own families and situations. The school board’s biggest mistake was sending out a survey about the calendar. It makes something simple so overly complicated trying to “let everyone’s voice be heard”. Why we can’t just do things like every other school district in this part of the country, I don’t know.
Nah, most of my teacher colleagues either a) don't care, as long as their schedule mirrors their kids' schedules, or b) would prefer a shorter summer to eliminate summer brain drain and the chaos of the first month back. The first quarter stinks because it's so much review. Coming back from winter break is 30 minutes of reacquainting ourselves to rules and procedures and moving on.
As a secondary teacher, all I care about is getting my days in before the AP exams. Doesn't matter to me if they are full weeks or short weeks, as long as I have an equal number of days with A/B classes and they happen before mid may. June days are worthless, August days are great.
Go talk to elementary teachers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People suggesting multiple weeks long breaks throughout the year are delusional. How much in a bubble are you that you think everyone else has the time and money to travel during those times? Talk about inequitable. The kids whose parents can’t afford to travel need childcare and there is no one to staff it when college students are not available. Not to mention many teachers would hate this schedule. It would push even more of them out of the profession. Who wants to deal with re-acclimating a classroom full of kids after several weeks off multiple times per year? People here think only of their own families and situations. The school board’s biggest mistake was sending out a survey about the calendar. It makes something simple so overly complicated trying to “let everyone’s voice be heard”. Why we can’t just do things like every other school district in this part of the country, I don’t know.
The childcare cost/burden would be the same with a shorter summer and longer breaks. It's the same number of school days on and school days off.
Anonymous wrote:The idea that businesses wouldn’t find a way to adapt is amusing. If school suddenly became 3 days a week, they’d figure things out. When a snow day happens, camps magically appear. When there are teacher workdays, there are camps. They wouldn’t be staffed by out of state college kids, sure—but I can’t tell you the last time my kids went to one that was. They are staffed by adults (parents who want part time work mostly) and high schoolers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The calendar seems longer than when I was a kid… maybe by about 2-3 weeks? My memory isn’t great though. I wonder what teachers think of the shortened summers? That always seemed like the best perk of the job.
As someone whose DD starts with FCPS this fall...teachers are paid as contract employees based on days - usually 195-day contracted employees - they get paid once a month and have to ensure they budget correctly because they don't get paid the "summer" months. So this might have something to do with it. Although I also see it as a downside because they'd have less summertime to get a 2nd job which many teachers do.
Also - remember...not all of FCPS is UMC - there are many and probably a lot more now (we all know the woes of overcrowded schools) who are on free or reduced lunch programs and these students are the ones who truly suffer with extended summer breaks.