Anonymous wrote:UVA was the worst of the bunch that we toured.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone raves about Bryn Mawr dining
Anonymous wrote:Kenyon was bad
Swarthmore was outstanding
Based on visits last year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe Niche and Princeton Review have covered this topic ad nauseum.
Because, after all, colleges should be chosen mostly on food hall quality (with some consideration for climbing walls and lazy rivers).
If your kid is an athlete, it matters a lot. Imagine paying for room and board, and then having to subsidize with more money so they can fill the tank. Quality and volume impact both athletic performance and academic learning. My older kids were not athletes but Mr. 14 is. Just started high school and our grocery bills have almost doubled. He is a combustion engine.
The question is valid, even if the answers are of no significance to you. I’ll be asking the same question three years from now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In general, those that run their own dining services tend to have better food. Those that contract dining services out to big corporate entities are not as good. Anecdotal observation, of course.
this is why I find Gladwell's evaluation so nuts. Bowdoin grows much of their own food, and they spend money on it, but mostly in the form of work-study back into students hands. vassar contracts it all out.
I never totally understood his argument. Bowdoin spends more on and gives out better financial aid than Vassar. Vassar is just a poorer college, not Bowdoin's fault.
Vassar is so run-down these days. It's unfortunate.
Anonymous wrote:Umass Amherst. Seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In general, those that run their own dining services tend to have better food. Those that contract dining services out to big corporate entities are not as good. Anecdotal observation, of course.
this is why I find Gladwell's evaluation so nuts. Bowdoin grows much of their own food, and they spend money on it, but mostly in the form of work-study back into students hands. vassar contracts it all out.
I never totally understood his argument. Bowdoin spends more on and gives out better financial aid than Vassar. Vassar is just a poorer college, not Bowdoin's fault.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:George Washington has great food, actually.
Please don't confuse it with Georgetown.
W&M had the worst food of all the colleges we visited two years ago, but I've heard they overhauled their dining.
That must be new, because when I went there 20 years ago the food hall was truly pathetic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe Niche and Princeton Review have covered this topic ad nauseum.
Because, after all, colleges should be chosen mostly on food hall quality (with some consideration for climbing walls and lazy rivers).