Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to finish this off - we all agree that the team that used a player that wasn’t on their team, put him in a uniform with a different player’s name and then lied about it was definitely in the wrong - right?

Everyone except one poster who sounds like she knows these people, or is the mom of that player maybe.

Anonymous wrote:Just to finish this off - we all agree that the team that used a player that wasn’t on their team, put him in a uniform with a different player’s name and then lied about it was definitely in the wrong - right?

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think kids should be allowed to cheat. I heard the team that discovered the cheating is being honored in a special ceremony. Good on you American Legion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to finish this off - we all agree that the team that used a player that wasn’t on their team, put him in a uniform with a different player’s name and then lied about it was definitely in the wrong - right?

So this is getting interesting. Word in the officiating circle is that the tattle team team ALSO had an illegal sub in the game but it wasnt caught until yesterday, so an official review is in process and will likely take that W away.

There is no such thing as an “officiating circle” - you made that up.

You don't think coaches, umps, refs, etc talk in NOVA?

Not in a circle.

I mean, technically you got me. These aren't grown men holding hands in a circle each morning. That's true. I bet you could even say their houses, if connected in a perimeter map, wouldn't even be a circle either.

You're right. They must not talk. At all. While they bump into one another every three nights for five-ish months a year, while living within a radius of 10, maybe 20 miles of each other. For decades at a time.

I guess I'll just keep my anecdotes to myself . Anybody want to hear the story about a Varsity player from _______ impregnating a coache's daughter?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just so you have all the facts - the player in question was not ineligible because of his age, he was ineligible because he wasn’t actually on the team’s roster. He arrived late to the game and went on to the field wearing another player’s jersey. The parent the OP mentioned is a friend of the family of the player who was supposedly subbed in and knew he was at the beach with his family. She then told the coach of her son’s team, who spoke to a tournament official, who then questioned the opposing coach. The opposing coaching at first claimed the player entering the game was indeed the player listed on the roster and wearing the right jersey. However, there were multiple parents who knew both kids and the coach eventually “confessed” that the player who entered the game was not on the roster. The game was then stopped and the cheating team forfeited. Side note - the cheating team was losing 6-2 when the game was called.

So now you're changing your story? Get a grip, gramps.

Umpire here. That post wasn’t mine, rather the OP. Why are you still here? I ejected your ass. Go clean your Prius.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to finish this off - we all agree that the team that used a player that wasn’t on their team, put him in a uniform with a different player’s name and then lied about it was definitely in the wrong - right?

So this is getting interesting. Word in the officiating circle is that the tattle team team ALSO had an illegal sub in the game but it wasnt caught until yesterday, so an official review is in process and will likely take that W away.

There is no such thing as an “officiating circle” - you made that up.

You don't think coaches, umps, refs, etc talk in NOVA?

Not in a circle.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just so you have all the facts - the player in question was not ineligible because of his age, he was ineligible because he wasn’t actually on the team’s roster. He arrived late to the game and went on to the field wearing another player’s jersey. The parent the OP mentioned is a friend of the family of the player who was supposedly subbed in and knew he was at the beach with his family. She then told the coach of her son’s team, who spoke to a tournament official, who then questioned the opposing coach. The opposing coaching at first claimed the player entering the game was indeed the player listed on the roster and wearing the right jersey. However, there were multiple parents who knew both kids and the coach eventually “confessed” that the player who entered the game was not on the roster. The game was then stopped and the cheating team forfeited. Side note - the cheating team was losing 6-2 when the game was called.

So now you're changing your story? Get a grip, gramps.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to finish this off - we all agree that the team that used a player that wasn’t on their team, put him in a uniform with a different player’s name and then lied about it was definitely in the wrong - right?

So this is getting interesting. Word in the officiating circle is that the tattle team team ALSO had an illegal sub in the game but it wasnt caught until yesterday, so an official review is in process and will likely take that W away.

100% not true. The team that discovered the cheating - and I assume we can all agree that cheating is wrong and should be reported - got the win and played again the following night. In that game, neither team cheated - which I assume we can all agree is a good thing.

And they lost.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to finish this off - we all agree that the team that used a player that wasn’t on their team, put him in a uniform with a different player’s name and then lied about it was definitely in the wrong - right?

So this is getting interesting. Word in the officiating circle is that the tattle team team ALSO had an illegal sub in the game but it wasnt caught until yesterday, so an official review is in process and will likely take that W away.

There is no such thing as an “officiating circle” - you made that up.

You don't think coaches, umps, refs, etc talk in NOVA?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to finish this off - we all agree that the team that used a player that wasn’t on their team, put him in a uniform with a different player’s name and then lied about it was definitely in the wrong - right?

So this is getting interesting. Word in the officiating circle is that the tattle team team ALSO had an illegal sub in the game but it wasnt caught until yesterday, so an official review is in process and will likely take that W away.

There is no such thing as an “officiating circle” - you made that up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to finish this off - we all agree that the team that used a player that wasn’t on their team, put him in a uniform with a different player’s name and then lied about it was definitely in the wrong - right?

So this is getting interesting. Word in the officiating circle is that the tattle team team ALSO had an illegal sub in the game but it wasnt caught until yesterday, so an official review is in process and will likely take that W away.

100% not true. The team that discovered the cheating - and I assume we can all agree that cheating is wrong and should be reported - got the win and played again the following night. In that game, neither team cheated - which I assume we can all agree is a good thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to finish this off - we all agree that the team that used a player that wasn’t on their team, put him in a uniform with a different player’s name and then lied about it was definitely in the wrong - right?

So this is getting interesting. Word in the officiating circle is that the tattle team team ALSO had an illegal sub in the game but it wasnt caught until yesterday, so an official review is in process and will likely take that W away.