Anonymous wrote:Stanford's more recent rise, especially in terms of international prestige, is notable. Harvard has been somewhat hurt, more outside the US than here, by being viewed as below MIT and Stanford in the hottest STEM fields.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard's reputation has definitely suffered in the past couple of years but it's still popular. But if it has some more high profile controversies, it will go downhill fast. PP is right in that they have been letting in a large crop of unimpressive TO students.
Why are their students not impressive? Some people seem to think that Harvard has lost prestige because they have some students and faculty that have been critical of Israel.
That's merely a blip. But it is part of a larger pattern. Harvard admits for undergrad these days are generally not regarded as the best and brightest. And there's a large activist contingent - protesting for the sake of protesting something.
Grad programs are different though. Outside of a few mediocre programs like Kennedy, it's the reason Harvard maintains its academic prestige.
I used to think that the business school was Harvard's power center, but now I think it's the law school. The sheer amount of global power in the alumni of that one part of the institution is just absurd: foreign and domestic heads of state, legislators, SC justices, fortune 500 CEO, entertainment execs, billionaire investors and their billionaire children, authors, national security agents, intellectuals, etc. This doesn't even include their absolutely rock star faculty. I think that one part of the university is responsible for a large part of the Harvard reputation, and my hunch is that once they realize it the law school administration is going to start demanding a lot more in terms of resources from the rest of the university. No more crumbling buildings that look like an inner city slum.
Graduate school is not undergrad — and is program specific. Yale Law is more prestigious than Harvard Law. Which you should know…
Not in global rankings, and not in any meaningful way (i.e., other than US News and various internet weirdos that fixate on their weird methodology.) The depth and reach of Harvard law is frankly unmatched.
Yeah, no; this is not even debatable. Nobody cares about global rankings and what you internationals think…everyone in the U.S. legal community knows Yale is the top (bull)dog.
Very NPC take.
It’s not really a “take”; you are just showing your ignorance.
THe peer reputation subscores in US news rankings have always been the same or higher for Harvard. Not that rankings matter, but I hardly think it's "not even debatable"
Anonymous wrote:It’s got a name that is easy to say, is nice & balanced, & sounds classy. If it had been named after Harry Weinblatt, Dick Weenie, or Rolpf Zerczievovicz it would be just another old school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have not read this entire thread, but wanted to mention that reading the student newspaper periodically this year - it seems like Harvard is a mess. Will it be able to keep its standing?
It'll be fine. It's filled with controversy just because of Congressmen getting pissy. Where did those Congressmen go to college? Oh right, Harvard.
For every plagiarizer they have on campus they have hundreds of faculty doing important work and who, often, are the most famous in their field.
It is still Harvard.
Oh - I am not just talking about that. Just take a look at the current edition of the student newspaper. A controversy about a law professor making statements that offend students to such an extent they want to ensure that no law student has to take a class of his; several people stepping down from leading Harvard's Legacy of Slavery initiative. Etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have not read this entire thread, but wanted to mention that reading the student newspaper periodically this year - it seems like Harvard is a mess. Will it be able to keep its standing?
It'll be fine. It's filled with controversy just because of Congressmen getting pissy. Where did those Congressmen go to college? Oh right, Harvard.
For every plagiarizer they have on campus they have hundreds of faculty doing important work and who, often, are the most famous in their field.
It is still Harvard.
Anonymous wrote:I have not read this entire thread, but wanted to mention that reading the student newspaper periodically this year - it seems like Harvard is a mess. Will it be able to keep its standing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard's reputation has definitely suffered in the past couple of years but it's still popular. But if it has some more high profile controversies, it will go downhill fast. PP is right in that they have been letting in a large crop of unimpressive TO students.
Why are their students not impressive? Some people seem to think that Harvard has lost prestige because they have some students and faculty that have been critical of Israel.
That's merely a blip. But it is part of a larger pattern. Harvard admits for undergrad these days are generally not regarded as the best and brightest. And there's a large activist contingent - protesting for the sake of protesting something.
Grad programs are different though. Outside of a few mediocre programs like Kennedy, it's the reason Harvard maintains its academic prestige.
I used to think that the business school was Harvard's power center, but now I think it's the law school. The sheer amount of global power in the alumni of that one part of the institution is just absurd: foreign and domestic heads of state, legislators, SC justices, fortune 500 CEO, entertainment execs, billionaire investors and their billionaire children, authors, national security agents, intellectuals, etc. This doesn't even include their absolutely rock star faculty. I think that one part of the university is responsible for a large part of the Harvard reputation, and my hunch is that once they realize it the law school administration is going to start demanding a lot more in terms of resources from the rest of the university. No more crumbling buildings that look like an inner city slum.
Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerburg probably have more power than most of those "lawyers".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard's reputation has definitely suffered in the past couple of years but it's still popular. But if it has some more high profile controversies, it will go downhill fast. PP is right in that they have been letting in a large crop of unimpressive TO students.
Why are their students not impressive? Some people seem to think that Harvard has lost prestige because they have some students and faculty that have been critical of Israel.
That's merely a blip. But it is part of a larger pattern. Harvard admits for undergrad these days are generally not regarded as the best and brightest. And there's a large activist contingent - protesting for the sake of protesting something.
Grad programs are different though. Outside of a few mediocre programs like Kennedy, it's the reason Harvard maintains its academic prestige.
I used to think that the business school was Harvard's power center, but now I think it's the law school. The sheer amount of global power in the alumni of that one part of the institution is just absurd: foreign and domestic heads of state, legislators, SC justices, fortune 500 CEO, entertainment execs, billionaire investors and their billionaire children, authors, national security agents, intellectuals, etc. This doesn't even include their absolutely rock star faculty. I think that one part of the university is responsible for a large part of the Harvard reputation, and my hunch is that once they realize it the law school administration is going to start demanding a lot more in terms of resources from the rest of the university. No more crumbling buildings that look like an inner city slum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard's reputation has definitely suffered in the past couple of years but it's still popular. But if it has some more high profile controversies, it will go downhill fast. PP is right in that they have been letting in a large crop of unimpressive TO students.
Why are their students not impressive? Some people seem to think that Harvard has lost prestige because they have some students and faculty that have been critical of Israel.
That's merely a blip. But it is part of a larger pattern. Harvard admits for undergrad these days are generally not regarded as the best and brightest. And there's a large activist contingent - protesting for the sake of protesting something.
Grad programs are different though. Outside of a few mediocre programs like Kennedy, it's the reason Harvard maintains its academic prestige.
I used to think that the business school was Harvard's power center, but now I think it's the law school. The sheer amount of global power in the alumni of that one part of the institution is just absurd: foreign and domestic heads of state, legislators, SC justices, fortune 500 CEO, entertainment execs, billionaire investors and their billionaire children, authors, national security agents, intellectuals, etc. This doesn't even include their absolutely rock star faculty. I think that one part of the university is responsible for a large part of the Harvard reputation, and my hunch is that once they realize it the law school administration is going to start demanding a lot more in terms of resources from the rest of the university. No more crumbling buildings that look like an inner city slum.
Graduate school is not undergrad — and is program specific. Yale Law is more prestigious than Harvard Law. Which you should know…
Not in global rankings, and not in any meaningful way (i.e., other than US News and various internet weirdos that fixate on their weird methodology.) The depth and reach of Harvard law is frankly unmatched.
Yeah, no; this is not even debatable. Nobody cares about global rankings and what you internationals think…everyone in the U.S. legal community knows Yale is the top (bull)dog.
Very NPC take.
It’s not really a “take”; you are just showing your ignorance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard's reputation has definitely suffered in the past couple of years but it's still popular. But if it has some more high profile controversies, it will go downhill fast. PP is right in that they have been letting in a large crop of unimpressive TO students.
Why are their students not impressive? Some people seem to think that Harvard has lost prestige because they have some students and faculty that have been critical of Israel.
That's merely a blip. But it is part of a larger pattern. Harvard admits for undergrad these days are generally not regarded as the best and brightest. And there's a large activist contingent - protesting for the sake of protesting something.
Grad programs are different though. Outside of a few mediocre programs like Kennedy, it's the reason Harvard maintains its academic prestige.
I used to think that the business school was Harvard's power center, but now I think it's the law school. The sheer amount of global power in the alumni of that one part of the institution is just absurd: foreign and domestic heads of state, legislators, SC justices, fortune 500 CEO, entertainment execs, billionaire investors and their billionaire children, authors, national security agents, intellectuals, etc. This doesn't even include their absolutely rock star faculty. I think that one part of the university is responsible for a large part of the Harvard reputation, and my hunch is that once they realize it the law school administration is going to start demanding a lot more in terms of resources from the rest of the university. No more crumbling buildings that look like an inner city slum.
Graduate school is not undergrad — and is program specific. Yale Law is more prestigious than Harvard Law. Which you should know…
Not in global rankings, and not in any meaningful way (i.e., other than US News and various internet weirdos that fixate on their weird methodology.) The depth and reach of Harvard law is frankly unmatched.
Yeah, no; this is not even debatable. Nobody cares about global rankings and what you internationals think…everyone in the U.S. legal community knows Yale is the top (bull)dog.
Very NPC take.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard's reputation has definitely suffered in the past couple of years but it's still popular. But if it has some more high profile controversies, it will go downhill fast. PP is right in that they have been letting in a large crop of unimpressive TO students.
Why are their students not impressive? Some people seem to think that Harvard has lost prestige because they have some students and faculty that have been critical of Israel.
That's merely a blip. But it is part of a larger pattern. Harvard admits for undergrad these days are generally not regarded as the best and brightest. And there's a large activist contingent - protesting for the sake of protesting something.
Grad programs are different though. Outside of a few mediocre programs like Kennedy, it's the reason Harvard maintains its academic prestige.
I used to think that the business school was Harvard's power center, but now I think it's the law school. The sheer amount of global power in the alumni of that one part of the institution is just absurd: foreign and domestic heads of state, legislators, SC justices, fortune 500 CEO, entertainment execs, billionaire investors and their billionaire children, authors, national security agents, intellectuals, etc. This doesn't even include their absolutely rock star faculty. I think that one part of the university is responsible for a large part of the Harvard reputation, and my hunch is that once they realize it the law school administration is going to start demanding a lot more in terms of resources from the rest of the university. No more crumbling buildings that look like an inner city slum.
Graduate school is not undergrad — and is program specific. Yale Law is more prestigious than Harvard Law. Which you should know…
Not in global rankings, and not in any meaningful way (i.e., other than US News and various internet weirdos that fixate on their weird methodology.) The depth and reach of Harvard law is frankly unmatched.
Yeah, no; this is not even debatable. Nobody cares about global rankings and what you internationals think…everyone in the U.S. legal community knows Yale is the top (bull)dog.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s got a name that is easy to say, is nice & balanced, & sounds classy. If it had been named after Harry Weinblatt, Dick Weenie, or Rolpf Zerczievovicz it would be just another old school.
Yeah, well, not a lot of names like that around in the 1600s.