Anonymous wrote:Marcus Jones didn't retire.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like a former police chief would be quite competitive for a job like this? Calling it corruption seems over the top. It's not like they hired a former chief of recycling for this job.

The job search was not competitive. It was created for him to park himself and his salary. If you knew the track record of this position, and how poorly retired law enforcement officials have performed in this role (hint: look up Ed Clarke's track record), then you wouldn't be chirping up about something you know nothing about.

Wow, you sound lovely.

If you're going to allege corruption, you need to have something beyond what you have shared here. For example, what did Jones do to get this job? Who did he pay off? Or did he abuse his position as police Chief to curry favor with MCPS? Give us something besides your attempts to bully other posters for questioning you.

You reveal who you are first and then I'll reveal how I know what I know.

You haven't even shared anything that relates to actual corruption. I have no idea what it is that know, and I do not care how you know this thing that you are not sharing.

I revealed what I know: This process was corrupt and the role was created/steered specifically for Jones. It was not an open search.

You challenged me on how I know what I know. I countered that you should reveal who you are first. You ignored that point conveniently.

Anonymous wrote:
I don't know how Marcus Jones feels about MCPD. But he was its chief and he has partnered with MCPS to spin and talk about crap that he knew were lies because again, regardless of whether they're MCPD or MCPS, MoCo is gonna protect MoCo. And since he was comfortable with the garbage spin that he spouted alongside Brian Hull here, I'm not convinced he'll suddenly become a truthteller.

LINK: https://www.facebook.com/mcpnews/videos/3674465332819978

The tangled relationship between the two is why MCPD stopped always posting on social media when a crime or serious incident was happening at a school because MCPS put pressure on MCPD that they were stirring the community up and making their life more difficult.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone's husband didn't get the job

Someone has no clue how politics works.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like a former police chief would be quite competitive for a job like this? Calling it corruption seems over the top. It's not like they hired a former chief of recycling for this job.

The job search was not competitive. It was created for him to park himself and his salary. If you knew the track record of this position, and how poorly retired law enforcement officials have performed in this role (hint: look up Ed Clarke's track record), then you wouldn't be chirping up about something you know nothing about.

Wow, you sound lovely.

If you're going to allege corruption, you need to have something beyond what you have shared here. For example, what did Jones do to get this job? Who did he pay off? Or did he abuse his position as police Chief to curry favor with MCPS? Give us something besides your attempts to bully other posters for questioning you.

You reveal who you are first and then I'll reveal how I know what I know.

You haven't even shared anything that relates to actual corruption. I have no idea what it is that know, and I do not care how you know this thing that you are not sharing.

Anonymous wrote:Someone's husband didn't get the job

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like a former police chief would be quite competitive for a job like this? Calling it corruption seems over the top. It's not like they hired a former chief of recycling for this job.

The job search was not competitive. It was created for him to park himself and his salary. If you knew the track record of this position, and how poorly retired law enforcement officials have performed in this role (hint: look up Ed Clarke's track record), then you wouldn't be chirping up about something you know nothing about.

Wow, you sound lovely.

If you're going to allege corruption, you need to have something beyond what you have shared here. For example, what did Jones do to get this job? Who did he pay off? Or did he abuse his position as police Chief to curry favor with MCPS? Give us something besides your attempts to bully other posters for questioning you.

You reveal who you are first and then I'll reveal how I know what I know.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Post reports that Jones said he was recruited for the job.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2024/06/25/marcus-jones-mcps-montgomery-schools-security/

Who recruited him? McKnight no
Felder no

Karla and the BOE. Maybe with the support, or encouragement, from Jawando and the County Council.

You are ridiculous. The board doesn't hire MCPS staff, except for the superintendent, and the council certainly does not.

Who did hire him? Felder left already.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Police officers are eligible for retirement after 25 years of service, so if you started right out of college, you'd be under age 50 when you retire. No surprise many start another career. The securty head at a private where our DS used to go was a former cop.

I think it's a great fit for the job -- he knows the county, he knows crime, and he knows the officers.

It is a conflict of interest to have someone who is former MCPD to serve in a role in MCPS where he might have to be adversarial or critical of MCPD, or vice versa where MCPD needs to be critical of MCPS, but won't because their former boss will get the blowback if they do.

If you think that former cops can't be critical of the department where they used to work, I feel like you don't know a lot of former cops.

Also, I don't really see many scenarios where the MCPS Chief of Security would be criticizing the work of the MCPD -- that's not his role. His role is to appropriately refer criminal conduct to MCPD, and to supervise the security staff that are MCPS employees (not MCPD employees). He may have to criticize the MCPS security staff. But I don't really see why he would be critiquing the MCPD investigation process -- that's for the MCPD Chief, or the County Council, to do. MCPD staff don't report to him.

One positive thing is that he presumably will not be afraid to refer things to MCPD. It's also likely a positive that he is pretty familiar already with the specific gang activity in the County and things like how the drug markets operate, so he knows what to look for. Someone from outside the county would presumably have a learning curve on that. Also, unlike Florida and South Carolina, Maryland is not an attractive retirement spot for retired law enforcement from other states, so we wouldn't be in a strong position to recruit former LEO from another state. If they are going to move their family, they are going to a state that doesn't tax their police pension.

I don't know anything about this guy -- he could be awful. But the mere fact that he was MCPD police chief isn't at all disqualifying from my perspective. And I've generally been pretty satisfied with MCPD response over the last decade or so.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Police officers are eligible for retirement after 25 years of service, so if you started right out of college, you'd be under age 50 when you retire. No surprise many start another career. The securty head at a private where our DS used to go was a former cop.

I think it's a great fit for the job -- he knows the county, he knows crime, and he knows the officers.

It is a conflict of interest to have someone who is former MCPD to serve in a role in MCPS where he might have to be adversarial or critical of MCPD, or vice versa where MCPD needs to be critical of MCPS, but won't because their former boss will get the blowback if they do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of people retire from Law Enforcement and then continue working.

A lot of people also retire from the military and then continue working.

A lot of people retire from education and then continue working.

This isn’t remotely a problem.

The problem is that MoCo recycles people instead of bringing in fresh blood, perspective and experience. We save seats for people and that's not how we should hire. We did not hire the "best" candidate for the job. We hired someone as an in-county favor.

They didn't do that with the Superintendent. And how do you know the MoCo Chief of Police isn't the best qualified? Seems to me that his experience working at MCPD and having deep insights in MoCo communities and neighborhoods are valuable things that he could bring to MCPS. I'm liking both of these hires so far.

Deep insights.
Now what does he do with that information? Is he going to start reporting everything that comes across his MCPS desk or is he going to cover up like Ed Clarke did?
Reporting everything is going to make MCPS look bad, but now he will work for them.

Correct. Being former MCPD and then transitioning to MCPS creates an inherent conflict of interest because on the MCPS side, sometimes you have to tell on people who might have failed in their jobs on the MCPD side, and it's hard to do that if some of those people are your friends.

Before people get excited about Marcus Jones, they should really interrogate how Ed Clarke did in the job, as he was also retired MCPD. Hopefully Jones is better and more active and independent, but he could be more of the same.

So you’re judging him on things you think he may/may not do in the new position, using an entirely different person as your proof. Got it.

I’m excited. I like Jones. I see this as a good move.

Good for you. Why are you threatened by people being critical about the Jones pick?

I’m certainly not threatened. He got the job, and I’m happy for him.

You’re welcome to be as critical as you like. Most of us will wait until he has actually done something to criticize, but you’re welcome to make assumptions instead.

You're not threatened, but you're throwing a hissy fit about a stranger's opinion on anonymous forum? Yeah. Ok

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Post reports that Jones said he was recruited for the job.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2024/06/25/marcus-jones-mcps-montgomery-schools-security/

Who recruited him? McKnight no
Felder no

Karla and the BOE. Maybe with the support, or encouragement, from Jawando and the County Council.

You are ridiculous. The board doesn't hire MCPS staff, except for the superintendent, and the council certainly does not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of people retire from Law Enforcement and then continue working.

A lot of people also retire from the military and then continue working.

A lot of people retire from education and then continue working.

This isn’t remotely a problem.

The problem is that MoCo recycles people instead of bringing in fresh blood, perspective and experience. We save seats for people and that's not how we should hire. We did not hire the "best" candidate for the job. We hired someone as an in-county favor.

They didn't do that with the Superintendent. And how do you know the MoCo Chief of Police isn't the best qualified? Seems to me that his experience working at MCPD and having deep insights in MoCo communities and neighborhoods are valuable things that he could bring to MCPS. I'm liking both of these hires so far.

Deep insights.
Now what does he do with that information? Is he going to start reporting everything that comes across his MCPS desk or is he going to cover up like Ed Clarke did?
Reporting everything is going to make MCPS look bad, but now he will work for them.

Correct. Being former MCPD and then transitioning to MCPS creates an inherent conflict of interest because on the MCPS side, sometimes you have to tell on people who might have failed in their jobs on the MCPD side, and it's hard to do that if some of those people are your friends.

Before people get excited about Marcus Jones, they should really interrogate how Ed Clarke did in the job, as he was also retired MCPD. Hopefully Jones is better and more active and independent, but he could be more of the same.

So you’re judging him on things you think he may/may not do in the new position, using an entirely different person as your proof. Got it.

I’m excited. I like Jones. I see this as a good move.

Good for you. Why are you threatened by people being critical about the Jones pick?

I’m certainly not threatened. He got the job, and I’m happy for him.

You’re welcome to be as critical as you like. Most of us will wait until he has actually done something to criticize, but you’re welcome to make assumptions instead.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of people retire from Law Enforcement and then continue working.

A lot of people also retire from the military and then continue working.

A lot of people retire from education and then continue working.

This isn’t remotely a problem.

The problem is that MoCo recycles people instead of bringing in fresh blood, perspective and experience. We save seats for people and that's not how we should hire. We did not hire the "best" candidate for the job. We hired someone as an in-county favor.

They didn't do that with the Superintendent. And how do you know the MoCo Chief of Police isn't the best qualified? Seems to me that his experience working at MCPD and having deep insights in MoCo communities and neighborhoods are valuable things that he could bring to MCPS. I'm liking both of these hires so far.

You're not threatened, but you're throwing a hissy fit about a stranger's opinion on anonymous forum? Yeah. Ok.

Deep insights.
Now what does he do with that information? Is he going to start reporting everything that comes across his MCPS desk or is he going to cover up like Ed Clarke did?
Reporting everything is going to make MCPS look bad, but now he will work for them.

Correct. Being former MCPD and then transitioning to MCPS creates an inherent conflict of interest because on the MCPS side, sometimes you have to tell on people who might have failed in their jobs on the MCPD side, and it's hard to do that if some of those people are your friends.

Before people get excited about Marcus Jones, they should really interrogate how Ed Clarke did in the job, as he was also retired MCPD. Hopefully Jones is better and more active and independent, but he could be more of the same.

So you’re judging him on things you think he may/may not do in the new position, using an entirely different person as your proof. Got it.

I’m excited. I like Jones. I see this as a good move.

Good for you. Why are you threatened by people being critical about the Jones pick?

I’m certainly not threatened. He got the job, and I’m happy for him.

You’re welcome to be as critical as you like. Most of us will wait until he has actually done something to criticize, but you’re welcome to make assumptions instead.