Anonymous wrote:has anyone watched this series? her parents seem...very forgiving of OJ. it's bizarre.

Not bizarre at all when you realize OJ sent them into early retirement . They told Nicole to go back after he hit her. Her family including these sisters were all bummed she divorced the gravy train

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

You can't pick and choose, Donald

You can't change Johnny Cochran's infamous legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a top, top lawyer. His legacy is good. Blame Fuhrman for being a racist. A racist who after his career with the LAPD was over, was still able to land gigs with Fox News. But then again, I guess that wouldn't fit your narrative would it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:has anyone watched this series? her parents seem...very forgiving of OJ. it's bizarre.

For the kids...

ummmm.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

The jury is unfairly blamed . The prosecution and cops messed up.

Along with OJ, everyone who had a role in his walking free deserves blame.

Anonymous wrote:has anyone watched this series? her parents seem...very forgiving of OJ. it's bizarre.

For the kids...

has anyone watched this series? her parents seem...very forgiving of OJ. it's bizarre.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

Funny you compare Cochran to Hitler and not OJ’s Jewish defense attorneys . Cochran gets painted as a bad guy when Shapiro and everyone else aren’t.

Hitlers actual fanboy was Furhman.

He had a swastika on his police locker. His own fellow cops were the ones who ratted on him and said he shouldn’t be lead detective on the case.

Again, the city of LA messed up. Furhman shouldn’t have been lead detective. He plead the fifth when asked if he participated in evidence planting or tampering with this case.

The entire case should’ve been hung jury and tried

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

The jury is unfairly blamed . The prosecution and cops messed up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

The case went through the legal system and a fair trial, Cochran did his job well. His role was to be OJ’s defense attorney. I don’t understand why you’re mad at him, and what more you expected him to do. Did you prefer him to not do his job well?

If you feel OJ is guilty based on the evidence presented during the case, then you should be mad at the prosecutors for not doing their jobs well enough.

Your anger at Cochran is strange and misplaced. It’s like you’re mad at him for being an attorney and doing the job he was paid to do.

C'mon. Some attys are corrupt, out for money, and deceitful. Some are outstanding and highly moral. Mr. Cochran was the former type of lawyer.

He most certainly was not. You sound ignorant of the roles of the individuals in the criminal process. Or you don't believe in the constitutional and rights it provides.

I believe in justice for victims. In this case, two individuals who were slashed to the point of almost being beheaded.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

You can't pick and choose, Donald

You can't change Johnny Cochran's infamous legacy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

You can't pick and choose, Donald

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

The case went through the legal system and a fair trial, Cochran did his job well. His role was to be OJ’s defense attorney. I don’t understand why you’re mad at him, and what more you expected him to do. Did you prefer him to not do his job well?

If you feel OJ is guilty based on the evidence presented during the case, then you should be mad at the prosecutors for not doing their jobs well enough.

Your anger at Cochran is strange and misplaced. It’s like you’re mad at him for being an attorney and doing the job he was paid to do.

C'mon. Some attys are corrupt, out for money, and deceitful. Some are outstanding and highly moral. Mr. Cochran was the former type of lawyer.

He most certainly was not. You sound ignorant of the roles of the individuals in the criminal process. Or you don't believe in the constitutional and rights it provides.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

^ Trump NY jury

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.