Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Muscle does NOT WEIGH MORE THAN FAT. This is such wrong and outdated thinking. Muscle is more dense than fat, meaning 1 lb of muscle takes up less space than 1 lb of fat meaning someone who is 150 lbs but has lots of muscle will *weigh the same* but look better and leaner than someone who is also 150 lbs but with very little muscle and a high body fat percentage. They will not weigh less.
By this logic, no material weighs less than another. You can always just add more of the less dense material.
So you don’t like the short hand for this. We are glad you have spent a lot of time correcting others. 👏 👏
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's crucial to understand that weight loss is a result of a balanced approach. While diet plays a significant role, exercise is equally important.
Let's delve into the science of weight loss. Exercising is indeed beneficial, but it's effective in weight loss only when you maintain a caloric deficit, meaning you burn more calories than you consume.
It is true that you can't outrun the fork. So, why did I say exercise matters? If you eat 5000 calories, no exercise will matter, but if you are eating 2-2.5k calories, it matters a lot.
I can never lose weight just by eating less; it is not sustainable for me. I do 45 minutes of fast walking at 4.5 miles an hour and start losing weight immediately. But I do not start adding calories.
Once you have muscles, you will burn more fat just by sitting around. I weigh around 122 lbs, and I can go up to 130 lbs; in order for any weight to move at my age and weight, I have to reset my body. This means I have to eat a lot for a few days to tell my body to keep burning the calories. Then I added exercise, and then I start eating less.
I am 53, and all I am trying to do is lose a few pounds in my stomach. It is not as easy as it was when I was 40 or 30. But when I add the 45 minutes, it is a huge difference in losing a few pounds. I think it should be an even bigger difference for a person who is actually overweight.
I thought you were going to delve? Where is the delving?
I'm trying to figure out how she walks 4.5 mph. I can do 4mph and feel like I might as well be running.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Muscle does NOT WEIGH MORE THAN FAT. This is such wrong and outdated thinking. Muscle is more dense than fat, meaning 1 lb of muscle takes up less space than 1 lb of fat meaning someone who is 150 lbs but has lots of muscle will *weigh the same* but look better and leaner than someone who is also 150 lbs but with very little muscle and a high body fat percentage. They will not weigh less.
By this logic, no material weighs less than another. You can always just add more of the less dense material.
So you don’t like the short hand for this. We are glad you have spent a lot of time correcting others. 👏 👏
Some material DOES weigh less than others. It will take MORE cotton to reach a pound of cotton than it will take iron to reach a pound of iron. A pound of either weighs a pound though. No matter what.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course she’ll overstate food intake because she’s a nutritionist. What do you think a personal trainer would say?
It’s genetics, calories, exercise.
If you have horrible genetics (overweight mother & father & siblings) what should you focus on? Need to lose 30 pounds.
Have been strength training 3x/week for 9+ months. Weights weigh 8-15 pounds.
Have lost 7 pounds…..total.
No cardio?
A little:
20 min jogging/elliptical before strength.
Walking 10k steps 3x/week
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Muscle does NOT WEIGH MORE THAN FAT. This is such wrong and outdated thinking. Muscle is more dense than fat, meaning 1 lb of muscle takes up less space than 1 lb of fat meaning someone who is 150 lbs but has lots of muscle will *weigh the same* but look better and leaner than someone who is also 150 lbs but with very little muscle and a high body fat percentage. They will not weigh less.
By this logic, no material weighs less than another. You can always just add more of the less dense material.
So you don’t like the short hand for this. We are glad you have spent a lot of time correcting others. 👏 👏
Anonymous wrote:Went to a nutritionist this week and she told that exercise doesn’t help lose weight. She said it’s all about limiting the calorie intake of food. True? Not true? What’s your experience? Btw, I’m only trying to lose a few pounds - through diet and exercise.
Anonymous wrote:Muscle does NOT WEIGH MORE THAN FAT. This is such wrong and outdated thinking. Muscle is more dense than fat, meaning 1 lb of muscle takes up less space than 1 lb of fat meaning someone who is 150 lbs but has lots of muscle will *weigh the same* but look better and leaner than someone who is also 150 lbs but with very little muscle and a high body fat percentage. They will not weigh less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's crucial to understand that weight loss is a result of a balanced approach. While diet plays a significant role, exercise is equally important.
Let's delve into the science of weight loss. Exercising is indeed beneficial, but it's effective in weight loss only when you maintain a caloric deficit, meaning you burn more calories than you consume.
It is true that you can't outrun the fork. So, why did I say exercise matters? If you eat 5000 calories, no exercise will matter, but if you are eating 2-2.5k calories, it matters a lot.
I can never lose weight just by eating less; it is not sustainable for me. I do 45 minutes of fast walking at 4.5 miles an hour and start losing weight immediately. But I do not start adding calories.
Once you have muscles, you will burn more fat just by sitting around. I weigh around 122 lbs, and I can go up to 130 lbs; in order for any weight to move at my age and weight, I have to reset my body. This means I have to eat a lot for a few days to tell my body to keep burning the calories. Then I added exercise, and then I start eating less.
I am 53, and all I am trying to do is lose a few pounds in my stomach. It is not as easy as it was when I was 40 or 30. But when I add the 45 minutes, it is a huge difference in losing a few pounds. I think it should be an even bigger difference for a person who is actually overweight.
I thought you were going to delve? Where is the delving?
Anonymous wrote:Remember, muscle weighs more than fat. Muscle will tighten you though. If you exercise a lot it will burn calories that make you lose weight.