Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI, just posted above re: NESCAC recruiting. I am reading about over recruiting in some posts and it does seem like that is a thing in some schools. That is not the case from what I saw with NESCAC. The schools are hard to get in and expensive. There are a lot of interested players who want to play but by the time you narrow the pool to those who can get in (even with coach support you need good grades/scores/etc.), afford the school (most NESCAC do not have merit and though most are need blind, they are very expensive schools if full pay), and play at the competitive level, the numbers shrink dramatically. Therefore, I don’t the coaches are over recruiting which is why I think they welcome walk-ons (if you have the talent).
I had two kids who were recruited athletes at NESCACs and I never heard of a walk on playing at all. These colleges take their sports seriously, and the standard is high in that conference - quality recruits with good academics are rare, and they go all out to find them.[/quote
This folks right here is why you cannot believe anything you read on DCUM. This person is just making up stories, for no reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crew doesn't count. It's not an NCAA sport.
Check your facts. It’s an NCAA D1/D3 sport for women and recruitable D1/D3 sport for men (different governing body).
Rowing has been a DI NCAA sport for women since the 1990s
Anonymous wrote:FYI, just posted above re: NESCAC recruiting. I am reading about over recruiting in some posts and it does seem like that is a thing in some schools. That is not the case from what I saw with NESCAC. The schools are hard to get in and expensive. There are a lot of interested players who want to play but by the time you narrow the pool to those who can get in (even with coach support you need good grades/scores/etc.), afford the school (most NESCAC do not have merit and though most are need blind, they are very expensive schools if full pay), and play at the competitive level, the numbers shrink dramatically. Therefore, I don’t the coaches are over recruiting which is why I think they welcome walk-ons (if you have the talent).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My suspicion is that at a NESCAC, probably not. Those guys are all DI caliber athletes who chose to attend those schools. Probably more likely at other DIII schools.
The NESCAC conference is among the best D3 in the nation and most of those schools are amongst the most academically rigorous. The fact is, most of those schools have their pick of the best D3/low end D1 athletes (assuming they have the grades as well…which is a big if).
And I meant to add, none of these schools have walk ons that play, in any sport.
That’s a serious exaggeration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My suspicion is that at a NESCAC, probably not. Those guys are all DI caliber athletes who chose to attend those schools. Probably more likely at other DIII schools.
The NESCAC conference is among the best D3 in the nation and most of those schools are amongst the most academically rigorous. The fact is, most of those schools have their pick of the best D3/low end D1 athletes (assuming they have the grades as well…which is a big if).
And I meant to add, none of these schools have walk ons that play, in any sport.
That’s a serious exaggeration.
No it absolutely is not. NESCAC take their recruiting very seriously, big wins equals big donations.
You said “none of these schools have walk ons that play, in any sport.” All one need do is look. Every school has walk-ons that play, even the NESCAC schools. Walk-ons of course have a less direct path to playing, but it happens, probably in ever sport at every school or close to it, the opposite of what you claim.
https://amherststudent.com/article/walk-ons-unique-paths-turn-strangers-to-teammates/amp/
And yes you can click on the player names to see they actually played.
Searching by other school names will lead to similae results.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crew doesn't count. It's not an NCAA sport.
Check your facts. It’s an NCAA D1/D3 sport for women and recruitable D1/D3 sport for men (different governing body).
Rowing has been a DI NCAA sport for women since the 1990s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crew doesn't count. It's not an NCAA sport.
Check your facts. It’s an NCAA D1/D3 sport for women and recruitable D1/D3 sport for men (different governing body).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My suspicion is that at a NESCAC, probably not. Those guys are all DI caliber athletes who chose to attend those schools. Probably more likely at other DIII schools.
The NESCAC conference is among the best D3 in the nation and most of those schools are amongst the most academically rigorous. The fact is, most of those schools have their pick of the best D3/low end D1 athletes (assuming they have the grades as well…which is a big if).
And I meant to add, none of these schools have walk ons that play, in any sport.
That’s a serious exaggeration.
No it absolutely is not. NESCAC take their recruiting very seriously, big wins equals big donations.
Anonymous wrote:Definitely still exists for gymnastics. Especially for in state students eligible for state scholarships or lower fees anyway, gymnasts often want to compete for a better team with no extra money than a worse team that will give them cash. UCLA, Utah, Georgia, Florida -all definitely have walk ons that compete. Occasionally those kids earn a scholarship, usually when something happens with a scholarship a coach thought was taken at the last minute.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI, just posted above re: NESCAC recruiting. I am reading about over recruiting in some posts and it does seem like that is a thing in some schools. That is not the case from what I saw with NESCAC. The schools are hard to get in and expensive. There are a lot of interested players who want to play but by the time you narrow the pool to those who can get in (even with coach support you need good grades/scores/etc.), afford the school (most NESCAC do not have merit and though most are need blind, they are very expensive schools if full pay), and play at the competitive level, the numbers shrink dramatically. Therefore, I don’t the coaches are over recruiting which is why I think they welcome walk-ons (if you have the talent).
I had two kids who were recruited athletes at NESCACs and I never heard of a walk on playing at all. These colleges take their sports seriously, and the standard is high in that conference - quality recruits with good academics are rare, and they go all out to find them.
Anonymous wrote:FYI, just posted above re: NESCAC recruiting. I am reading about over recruiting in some posts and it does seem like that is a thing in some schools. That is not the case from what I saw with NESCAC. The schools are hard to get in and expensive. There are a lot of interested players who want to play but by the time you narrow the pool to those who can get in (even with coach support you need good grades/scores/etc.), afford the school (most NESCAC do not have merit and though most are need blind, they are very expensive schools if full pay), and play at the competitive level, the numbers shrink dramatically. Therefore, I don’t the coaches are over recruiting which is why I think they welcome walk-ons (if you have the talent).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My suspicion is that at a NESCAC, probably not. Those guys are all DI caliber athletes who chose to attend those schools. Probably more likely at other DIII schools.
The NESCAC conference is among the best D3 in the nation and most of those schools are amongst the most academically rigorous. The fact is, most of those schools have their pick of the best D3/low end D1 athletes (assuming they have the grades as well…which is a big if).
And I meant to add, none of these schools have walk ons that play, in any sport.
That’s a serious exaggeration.