Anonymous wrote:OMFG. Are you a troll??
Getting 1410 on the SAT does NOT mean you have an undiagnosed learning disability. WTAF.
A 1410 is still above the ninetieth percentile!
Back the F off, tell your kid congrats on getting a 1410, and decide case by case for each school whether to submit the SAT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How does a kid who took Calculus in 10th grade have a 27 ACT? My 11th grade DC took Algebra 1 Honors in 9th and scored a 35 on the ACT.
Math isn’t weighted very much on ACT, which is why those who are good in math take the SAT. Also, Calc isn’t tested, rather concepts taught at an earlier age which may be forgotten.
Anonymous wrote:How does a kid who took Calculus in 10th grade have a 27 ACT? My 11th grade DC took Algebra 1 Honors in 9th and scored a 35 on the ACT.
Anonymous wrote:I thought the new adaptive SAT is much more generous with time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have twins.
They both do equally well at a rigorous school that is very stingy with As.
One is in harder classes (physics C, multivariate, etc).
The one in the easier classes takes standardized tests extremely well. NO PREP. First try ACT 35. First try SAT 1540/
The one in the harder classes just really struggles with the ACT/SAT. Scores have been 1410 and now 1360. ACT was 27.
He/she has done fine on AP exams (all 5). There is something about the SAT/ACT that he/she cannot perform on.
He/she has done extensive prep (several hours a week doing problems for months).
We're realizing that this kid probably has some sort of undiagnosed learning issue (too late for this now).
He/she can't read at the speed needed for the passages (even the short ones on the digital SAT). Has to read
things 2 and 3 times to focus. Also having issues with the math although it's less clear what.
Where would you go from here?
They're not going to apply to Ivies but we were hoping for reasonably competitive schools.
If not applying test optional, is there some way to do intensive prep?
It's so frustrating because on a daily basis these kids perform the same or if anything the second one is a stronger student in harder classes and able to grasp more abstract concepts.
Thoughts on what to do about prep?
Sorry OP,
Something isn’t adding up. You have a junior who is so far ahead in math that he/she is taking multivariable calc (and has an A or A-) as a junior AND has taken multiple AP tests and gotten 5s on each but is struggling with SAT/ACT after working with a tutor? This makes no sense. Perhaps you’ve embellished to hide identity?
I’d say it’s test anxiety, but so many things don’t add up that I’m just skeptical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not everyone can score a 35. A 27, a score in the 85th percentile, doesn't automatically mean there is a diagnosable learning difference. Isn't the average ACT score like a 20? I suppose you could try to get a diagnosis to get extended time, if time allows. However, isn't the time crunch supposed to be part of what makes the test a challenge?
Yeah, I graduated 20 years ago and 27 was considered a very good score. 35 was an out-of-this-world score that only one kid in my 2000-student UMC high school got (me) and I haven't had the career to show for it. I don't see where a 27 ACT is "struggling" unless the scoring has been completely revamped and all the kids are above average now.
THIS
Bc everyone on DCUM DESERVES to be able to get into a top school. The bell curve is ingored and inapplicable bc everyone on DCUM is or should automatically be at the very end of the distribution. If not, there must be a diagnosable difference bc it is impossible that anyone on DCUM would be towards the middle or, gasp, below the curve.
That’s a good point, but OP claims this student is so advanced that he/she is way ahead in math and multiple APs taken prior with the highest score.
Doesn’t sound so “average”.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not everyone can score a 35. A 27, a score in the 85th percentile, doesn't automatically mean there is a diagnosable learning difference. Isn't the average ACT score like a 20? I suppose you could try to get a diagnosis to get extended time, if time allows. However, isn't the time crunch supposed to be part of what makes the test a challenge?
Yeah, I graduated 20 years ago and 27 was considered a very good score. 35 was an out-of-this-world score that only one kid in my 2000-student UMC high school got (me) and I haven't had the career to show for it. I don't see where a 27 ACT is "struggling" unless the scoring has been completely revamped and all the kids are above average now.
THIS
Bc everyone on DCUM DESERVES to be able to get into a top school. The bell curve is ingored and inapplicable bc everyone on DCUM is or should automatically be at the very end of the distribution. If not, there must be a diagnosable difference bc it is impossible that anyone on DCUM would be towards the middle or, gasp, below the curve.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not everyone can score a 35. A 27, a score in the 85th percentile, doesn't automatically mean there is a diagnosable learning difference. Isn't the average ACT score like a 20? I suppose you could try to get a diagnosis to get extended time, if time allows. However, isn't the time crunch supposed to be part of what makes the test a challenge?
Yeah, I graduated 20 years ago and 27 was considered a very good score. 35 was an out-of-this-world score that only one kid in my 2000-student UMC high school got (me) and I haven't had the career to show for it. I don't see where a 27 ACT is "struggling" unless the scoring has been completely revamped and all the kids are above average now.
THIS
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have twins.
They both do equally well at a rigorous school that is very stingy with As.
One is in harder classes (physics C, multivariate, etc).
The one in the easier classes takes standardized tests extremely well. NO PREP. First try ACT 35. First try SAT 1540/
The one in the harder classes just really struggles with the ACT/SAT. Scores have been 1410 and now 1360. ACT was 27.
He/she has done fine on AP exams (all 5). There is something about the SAT/ACT that he/she cannot perform on.
He/she has done extensive prep (several hours a week doing problems for months).
We're realizing that this kid probably has some sort of undiagnosed learning issue (too late for this now).
He/she can't read at the speed needed for the passages (even the short ones on the digital SAT). Has to read
things 2 and 3 times to focus. Also having issues with the math although it's less clear what.
Where would you go from here?
They're not going to apply to Ivies but we were hoping for reasonably competitive schools.
If not applying test optional, is there some way to do intensive prep?
It's so frustrating because on a daily basis these kids perform the same or if anything the second one is a stronger student in harder classes and able to grasp more abstract concepts.
Thoughts on what to do about prep?
Sorry OP,
Something isn’t adding up. You have a junior who is so far ahead in math that he/she is taking multivariable calc (and has an A or A-) as a junior AND has taken multiple AP tests and gotten 5s on each but is struggling with SAT/ACT after working with a tutor? This makes no sense. Perhaps you’ve embellished to hide identity?
I’d say it’s test anxiety, but so many things don’t add up that I’m just skeptical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not everyone can score a 35. A 27, a score in the 85th percentile, doesn't automatically mean there is a diagnosable learning difference. Isn't the average ACT score like a 20? I suppose you could try to get a diagnosis to get extended time, if time allows. However, isn't the time crunch supposed to be part of what makes the test a challenge?
Yeah, I graduated 20 years ago and 27 was considered a very good score. 35 was an out-of-this-world score that only one kid in my 2000-student UMC high school got (me) and I haven't had the career to show for it. I don't see where a 27 ACT is "struggling" unless the scoring has been completely revamped and all the kids are above average now.
Anonymous wrote:I have twins.
They both do equally well at a rigorous school that is very stingy with As.
One is in harder classes (physics C, multivariate, etc).
The one in the easier classes takes standardized tests extremely well. NO PREP. First try ACT 35. First try SAT 1540/
The one in the harder classes just really struggles with the ACT/SAT. Scores have been 1410 and now 1360. ACT was 27.
He/she has done fine on AP exams (all 5). There is something about the SAT/ACT that he/she cannot perform on.
He/she has done extensive prep (several hours a week doing problems for months).
We're realizing that this kid probably has some sort of undiagnosed learning issue (too late for this now).
He/she can't read at the speed needed for the passages (even the short ones on the digital SAT). Has to read
things 2 and 3 times to focus. Also having issues with the math although it's less clear what.
Where would you go from here?
They're not going to apply to Ivies but we were hoping for reasonably competitive schools.
If not applying test optional, is there some way to do intensive prep?
It's so frustrating because on a daily basis these kids perform the same or if anything the second one is a stronger student in harder classes and able to grasp more abstract concepts.
Thoughts on what to do about prep?