Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is a spike? Did you just invent this term?
No, OP didnt invent this term. It's been around for several years now.
Not really - the term is pointy.
NP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is a spike? Did you just invent this term?
No, OP didnt invent this term. It's been around for several years now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is she most excited about?
Finally, someone nice. Thank you. She is passionate about music, STEM (particularly math), and writing. Like I said, not very concentrated. She excels most at math but plays her instrument at a high level. Is there a way to connect or narrow down these disciplines?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't have a problem with "We".
But you cannot create a spike where there isn't one, OP, not at the end of 9th grade. If she chooses to focus intensively on one aspect of her life, and ends up in the fall of 12th grade with several pieces of evidence that she has progressed to at least a regional, if not national or international level, then great! But how likely is it?
Most kids with a splinter skill were preparing for it, whether they knew it or not, years before high school. They had the conditioning to go far in their sports, or the music background to win major competitions, or the STEM knowledge to do well in Robotics or Math or Science events.
Also, schools ranked 30-50 are as selective now as higher-ranked schools used to be a few years ago.
So don't even think about T20. Think about building the best possible profile to open as many doors as possible. Maybe it will be a lower-ranked school, with merit aid and a nice Honors dorm. If that happens, you should be happy.
What is a “splinter skill”?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A parent generally cannot manufacture a spike. It is something innate with the student, a passion that they are obsessed about - debate, coding, football, whatever, something they truly excel at.
Does playing fifa on the Xbox count? My kid is very spiky at that.
OP - I have a kid who gets great grades, will have a ton of APs, plays his sport at the travel and high school level but not going to be recruited, plays his instrument well but not at any type of competitive level and is generally a lovely kid. He has no “passion” and we can’t fake one. He also doesn’t have a ton of personal drive - that may develop as he is only a sophomore but probably not in time for the college application process. So, he will apply to a wide variety of schools and see where he ends up. I think he would be able to handle a T5 school (like his sibling) just fine. But probably can’t convince a T5 school that they should take him. Which is their loss. Let your kid be. She will find her way. I know mine will.
Anonymous wrote:Here’s a hopefully helpful post for you, OP. I have twins finishing their first year in college. When they were applying, one was very spiky and the other was a generalist. Sounds like you may have one of the latter, and that’s great! I’d have your kid lean into doing a breadth of activities at a contributor level (eg the school play, a rec sport, volunteering at the library), one activity at a leadership level (eg treasurer of a club) and then get a real job every summer. Then maintain rigor and high GPA, study for and do well on SAT/ACT. Finally, cultivate good relationships with a few teachers, coaches or other adults who can write personal and specific recommendations. That’s it! Forget the spike, it’s too late if it hasn’t revealed itself by now. My generalist is at a T5 school. Good luck to your child and enjoy the next few years; they go quickly!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't invent their passion
Pretty sure most of the Ivy admits invented their passions, or their parents, or their expensive college counselor from NY whom they hired in upper elementary did
Nope. We are squarely middle class and couldn't afford a counselor. Both at Ivies with multiple T10 admits. I shared my love/knowledge of arts, helped brainstorm on activities, and acted as chaffeur. There were things my kids couldn't pursue because we just couldn't afford it. There were times when I said that if they wanted to stick with something, they needed to make more of an effort practicing if we were paying for pricey lessons (and getting a discount from the teacher), but that they didn't need to stick with it if they didn't want to. I gave them ideas on how to take their talents out of the box a little, but they chose what they wanted to pursue.
Anonymous wrote:What is a spike? Did you just invent this term?