Anonymous wrote:I only buy bike short or skort for my DD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WHy is there no middle ground between burqas and having your childs ass hanging out in these discussions
This may sound weird but the shorter athletic shorts (hottie hots and the athleta run free 2.5) don’t bother me. My 12 year old’s ass isn’t hanging out of them (she is only 5 feet tall) and she actually also wears them when she runs, not just with a tank top or a t shirt that makes it look like she’s not wearing shorts. Ass hanging out is where I draw the line, the shorts otherwise being short though isn’t something I’m stressing over.
I'm 5'0" and all torso. 2.5" inseam shorts never looked short on me, even in an era when short-shorts were popular.
My 12 year old is 5'4" and all legs. Same inseam looks very different on her. Rear is still not hanging out and I would probably be fine with it, but she prefers a longer inseam so that's what we do.
My problem is the width of the shorts. They're so wide!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WHy is there no middle ground between burqas and having your childs ass hanging out in these discussions
This may sound weird but the shorter athletic shorts (hottie hots and the athleta run free 2.5) don’t bother me. My 12 year old’s ass isn’t hanging out of them (she is only 5 feet tall) and she actually also wears them when she runs, not just with a tank top or a t shirt that makes it look like she’s not wearing shorts. Ass hanging out is where I draw the line, the shorts otherwise being short though isn’t something I’m stressing over.
Anonymous wrote:WHy is there no middle ground between burqas and having your childs ass hanging out in these discussions
Anonymous wrote:WHy is there no middle ground between burqas and having your childs ass hanging out in these discussions
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly no. I gave up on that one.
I drew a harder line on tops (I don’t allow anything that shows stomach at all or is low cut etc at this age).
I don’t think there is a right answer (and I don’t judge other parents by what they allow- it is hard) but IME you do have to pick your battles with things like this.
What is wrong with short tops or shorts? Teen boys like that look, and that’s totally normal.
Are we raising a generation of puritans?
So? My DD is not a prostitute.
-DP
OK so she IS a puritan. Make her dress head to toe with no skin at all exposed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly no. I gave up on that one.
I drew a harder line on tops (I don’t allow anything that shows stomach at all or is low cut etc at this age).
I don’t think there is a right answer (and I don’t judge other parents by what they allow- it is hard) but IME you do have to pick your battles with things like this.
What is wrong with short tops or shorts? Teen boys like that look, and that’s totally normal.
Are we raising a generation of puritans?
So? My DD is not a prostitute.
-DP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The division should be middle school and high school. The tween label could mean anything to people.
This. A 9 year old is definitely not a tween, my kid turned 9 in the 2nd half of 3rd grade! Although as a parent of a tween (12) I like perusing the threads here that are specific to teens to get a sense of what lies ahead.
9 year olds (especially younger sibs) are definitely wearing Lulu hottie hots and carrying Stanley’s where I live. Lord help us all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The division should be middle school and high school. The tween label could mean anything to people.
This. A 9 year old is definitely not a tween, my kid turned 9 in the 2nd half of 3rd grade! Although as a parent of a tween (12) I like perusing the threads here that are specific to teens to get a sense of what lies ahead.
Anonymous wrote:The division should be middle school and high school. The tween label could mean anything to people.