Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like I see so many posts from people who are considering divorce or divorced and say they have no expectations of remarriage and neither should anyone else considering divorce. Is that because their experience was so terrible that they are skeptical a new experience will be different? Or because marriage for them was always just about kids and pointless if kids aren't involved? Or because they don't want to be on the hook for taking care of a new older person? Or because they dont think anyone worthwhile will want to marry a 40/50/60/70 something man/ woman etc? or other.
I’ll go with “other”.
There are benefits to being married when you have kids, so I got married because I wanted kids. Now I have my kids and they are grown. My kids will inherit everything I have. If I were to get married there would be zero benefit. I can make a commitment to someone without the additional paperwork. I don’t want any new person to get any inheritance - only my children. So it’s really that simple. I will have a “marriage” type relationship, but not a legal one. Oh, and I’m not religious. I don’t get how religious people “marry for life” then divorce and maintain their religion - it’s morality gymnastics.
This.
You make a good will.
Nope. Seen those invalidated and long battles. Even if not- Too much animosity created in families.
Better to never marry. No need for it when kids are grown.
That will happen regardless since courts rarely hold executors accountable and lots of secrecy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like I see so many posts from people who are considering divorce or divorced and say they have no expectations of remarriage and neither should anyone else considering divorce. Is that because their experience was so terrible that they are skeptical a new experience will be different? Or because marriage for them was always just about kids and pointless if kids aren't involved? Or because they don't want to be on the hook for taking care of a new older person? Or because they dont think anyone worthwhile will want to marry a 40/50/60/70 something man/ woman etc? or other.
I’ll go with “other”.
There are benefits to being married when you have kids, so I got married because I wanted kids. Now I have my kids and they are grown. My kids will inherit everything I have. If I were to get married there would be zero benefit. I can make a commitment to someone without the additional paperwork. I don’t want any new person to get any inheritance - only my children. So it’s really that simple. I will have a “marriage” type relationship, but not a legal one. Oh, and I’m not religious. I don’t get how religious people “marry for life” then divorce and maintain their religion - it’s morality gymnastics.
This.
You make a good will.
Nope. Seen those invalidated and long battles. Even if not- Too much animosity created in families.
Better to never marry. No need for it when kids are grown.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like I see so many posts from people who are considering divorce or divorced and say they have no expectations of remarriage and neither should anyone else considering divorce. Is that because their experience was so terrible that they are skeptical a new experience will be different? Or because marriage for them was always just about kids and pointless if kids aren't involved? Or because they don't want to be on the hook for taking care of a new older person? Or because they dont think anyone worthwhile will want to marry a 40/50/60/70 something man/ woman etc? or other.
I’ll go with “other”.
There are benefits to being married when you have kids, so I got married because I wanted kids. Now I have my kids and they are grown. My kids will inherit everything I have. If I were to get married there would be zero benefit. I can make a commitment to someone without the additional paperwork. I don’t want any new person to get any inheritance - only my children. So it’s really that simple. I will have a “marriage” type relationship, but not a legal one. Oh, and I’m not religious. I don’t get how religious people “marry for life” then divorce and maintain their religion - it’s morality gymnastics.
This.
You make a good will.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like I see so many posts from people who are considering divorce or divorced and say they have no expectations of remarriage and neither should anyone else considering divorce. Is that because their experience was so terrible that they are skeptical a new experience will be different? Or because marriage for them was always just about kids and pointless if kids aren't involved? Or because they don't want to be on the hook for taking care of a new older person? Or because they dont think anyone worthwhile will want to marry a 40/50/60/70 something man/ woman etc? or other.
I’ll go with “other”.
There are benefits to being married when you have kids, so I got married because I wanted kids. Now I have my kids and they are grown. My kids will inherit everything I have. If I were to get married there would be zero benefit. I can make a commitment to someone without the additional paperwork. I don’t want any new person to get any inheritance - only my children. So it’s really that simple. I will have a “marriage” type relationship, but not a legal one. Oh, and I’m not religious. I don’t get how religious people “marry for life” then divorce and maintain their religion - it’s morality gymnastics.
This.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Totally financial and legal. When women can work and don’t need men to provide for them, there’s zero reason to entangle yourself with legal marriage. I can see myself in a long-term partnership, but I would never enter into a legal arrangement that gives a man a right to my pension, 401k and other assets. I suppose you can write up a pre-nup to take care of those things but I’m really not interested in fighting off the law in that way. Live together, maybe even purchase a home together? Sure. Beyond that, no.
I wonder how much assets people have to think that way. I’ll have over $5mm by 50. Still would remarry with prenup, it’s not that difficult or expensive to draft. Kids inheritances, alimony, pensions - all this can be easily addressed there
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like I see so many posts from people who are considering divorce or divorced and say they have no expectations of remarriage and neither should anyone else considering divorce. Is that because their experience was so terrible that they are skeptical a new experience will be different? Or because marriage for them was always just about kids and pointless if kids aren't involved? Or because they don't want to be on the hook for taking care of a new older person? Or because they dont think anyone worthwhile will want to marry a 40/50/60/70 something man/ woman etc? or other.
I’ll go with “other”.
There are benefits to being married when you have kids, so I got married because I wanted kids. Now I have my kids and they are grown. My kids will inherit everything I have. If I were to get married there would be zero benefit. I can make a commitment to someone without the additional paperwork. I don’t want any new person to get any inheritance - only my children. So it’s really that simple. I will have a “marriage” type relationship, but not a legal one. Oh, and I’m not religious. I don’t get how religious people “marry for life” then divorce and maintain their religion - it’s morality gymnastics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Totally financial and legal. When women can work and don’t need men to provide for them, there’s zero reason to entangle yourself with legal marriage. I can see myself in a long-term partnership, but I would never enter into a legal arrangement that gives a man a right to my pension, 401k and other assets. I suppose you can write up a pre-nup to take care of those things but I’m really not interested in fighting off the law in that way. Live together, maybe even purchase a home together? Sure. Beyond that, no.
I wonder how much assets people have to think that way. I’ll have over $5mm by 50. Still would remarry with prenup, it’s not that difficult or expensive to draft. Kids inheritances, alimony, pensions - all this can be easily addressed there
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Totally financial and legal. When women can work and don’t need men to provide for them, there’s zero reason to entangle yourself with legal marriage. I can see myself in a long-term partnership, but I would never enter into a legal arrangement that gives a man a right to my pension, 401k and other assets. I suppose you can write up a pre-nup to take care of those things but I’m really not interested in fighting off the law in that way. Live together, maybe even purchase a home together? Sure. Beyond that, no.
Anonymous wrote:If someone sticks a needle in my eye, why would I pull it out and stick it back in again?