Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a Democrat and an immigrant, SC decision is a good decision. We have to decide if we have a border or not, I have not seen anything like this ever in my life where people want to pretend their country has no border.

WTH is wrong with people here???

States need to stay in their lane. Each state can’t have its own immigration policy.

I think we need to look at the upside here. If blue states could set their own immigration policies, we could ban dipshits from red states.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish they let this go into effect. It’s entirely performative. Texas doesn’t have the resources to prosecute and imprison millions of immigrants. And mexico won’t accept deportations from Texas. So Texas would quickly move into the same “catch and release” system that they’ve been belly aching about.

I think the bolded bit is key here. Why are we not demanding better from Mexico? The influx is partly their fault.

Mexico is smart enough to only want to deal with federal deportations, not state ones.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a Democrat and an immigrant, SC decision is a good decision. We have to decide if we have a border or not, I have not seen anything like this ever in my life where people want to pretend their country has no border.

WTH is wrong with people here???

States need to stay in their lane. Each state can’t have its own immigration policy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a Democrat and an immigrant, SC decision is a good decision. We have to decide if we have a border or not, I have not seen anything like this ever in my life where people want to pretend their country has no border.

WTH is wrong with people here???

States need to stay in their lane. Each state can’t have its own immigration policy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you think it is such a bad decision, OP?

DP...it allows the "texas authorities" to sweep up anyone who could be a migrant. ie anyone who looks Latino. Regardless of being a born American, a legal immigrant or someone who crossed illegally. IOW, no due process and it is the beginning of "brownshirts" basically.

Oh, BS. It simply means if you cross illegally - not at a designated border crossing - you will then be arrested and deported. As ANY country would do. Stop spreading your LWNJ propaganda. This should have been implemented long, long ago.
DP

DP apparently Texas is seizing property of anyone who looks or sounds Hispanic.

That's fine, right? All the posters who think this is a great new law think so, right?

Anonymous wrote:I am a Democrat and an immigrant, SC decision is a good decision. We have to decide if we have a border or not, I have not seen anything like this ever in my life where people want to pretend their country has no border.

WTH is wrong with people here???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you think it is such a bad decision, OP?

DP...it allows the "texas authorities" to sweep up anyone who could be a migrant. ie anyone who looks Latino. Regardless of being a born American, a legal immigrant or someone who crossed illegally. IOW, no due process and it is the beginning of "brownshirts" basically.

Oh, BS. It simply means if you cross illegally - not at a designated border crossing - you will then be arrested and deported. As ANY country would do. Stop spreading your LWNJ propaganda. This should have been implemented long, long ago.
DP

Anonymous wrote:Gov. Greg Abbott for president. And Cory Mills as VP.

Anonymous wrote:I am a Democrat and an immigrant, SC decision is a good decision. We have to decide if we have a border or not, I have not seen anything like this ever in my life where people want to pretend their country has no border.

WTH is wrong with people here???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you think it is such a bad decision, OP?

DP...it allows the "texas authorities" to sweep up anyone who could be a migrant. ie anyone who looks Latino. Regardless of being a born American, a legal immigrant or someone who crossed illegally. IOW, no due process and it is the beginning of "brownshirts" basically.

Texas does not have the resources to do massive sweeps that you dream about. But according to the law they passed, if someone crosses they can be immediately returned to Mexico. There is no due process needed for jumping the border. Deporting people that are here illegally is righting a wrong.

What has happened is that Texas is filling a void that Biden created. Texas has been begging the Biden administration to get a handle on the invasion of illegal immigrants and has been ignored.

Biden didn't create this problem. We've been in need of immigration reform specific to migrants seeking to enter through our southern border for decades. Some policies that were put in place as short term fixes have been reversed or not extended in recent years and that has made the problem worse some of that blame may fall on the Biden Administration but we need to focus on long term solutions through comprehensive immigration reform. Per US Immigration Law, asylum seekers have to be present in the US in order to apply. This law needs to be changed to allow asylum seekers currently residing in North, Central, and South America (or anywhere in the world if feasible) to apply through US Embassies in their home countries. This would require a large investment in people and resources in those countries but no more of an investment than what the US taxpayer is currently facing with any solutions that involve speeding up the asylum application process and housing/supporting the migrants while they're here. Secure the border completely, stop allowing migrants seeking asylum into the country until their asylum claim is processed, and offset these
measures with investment abroad to allow for a proper, speedy, and humane process of granting or denying asylum to those that apply. There is no legitimate and humane long term solution that involves hundreds of thousands of people making long and dangerous journeys through our southern border to take advantage of our flawed and slow asylum process.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you think it is such a bad decision, OP?

DP...it allows the "texas authorities" to sweep up anyone who could be a migrant. ie anyone who looks Latino. Regardless of being a born American, a legal immigrant or someone who crossed illegally. IOW, no due process and it is the beginning of "brownshirts" basically.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you think it is such a bad decision, OP?

DP...it allows the "texas authorities" to sweep up anyone who could be a migrant. ie anyone who looks Latino. Regardless of being a born American, a legal immigrant or someone who crossed illegally. IOW, no due process and it is the beginning of "brownshirts" basically.

Texas does not have the resources to do massive sweeps that you dream about. But according to the law they passed, if someone crosses they can be immediately returned to Mexico. There is no due process needed for jumping the border. Deporting people that are here illegally is righting a wrong.

What has happened is that Texas is filling a void that Biden created. Texas has been begging the Biden administration to get a handle on the invasion of illegal immigrants and has been ignored.

Biden didn't create this problem. We've been in need of immigration reform specific to migrants seeking to enter through our southern border for decades. Some policies that were put in place as short term fixes have been reversed or not extended in recent years and that has made the problem worse some of that blame may fall on the Biden Administration but we need to focus on long term solutions through comprehensive immigration reform. Per US Immigration Law, asylum seekers have to be present in the US in order to apply. This law needs to be changed to allow asylum seekers currently residing in North, Central, and South America (or anywhere in the world if feasible) to apply through US Embassies in their home countries. This would require a large investment in people and resources in those countries but no more of an investment than what the US taxpayer is currently facing with any solutions that involve speeding up the asylum application process and housing/supporting the migrants while they're here. Secure the border completely, stop allowing migrants seeking asylum into the country until their asylum claim is processed, and offset these
measures with investment abroad to allow for a proper, speedy, and humane process of granting or denying asylum to those that apply. There is no legitimate and humane long term solution that involves hundreds of thousands of people making long and dangerous journeys through our southern border to take advantage of our flawed and slow asylum process.

What a BS statement.
It has NEVER - in the history of our country - been this bad, Never.
This is Joe Biden's doing.

100% correct. And it will cost Biden his re-election.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you think it is such a bad decision, OP?

DP...it allows the "texas authorities" to sweep up anyone who could be a migrant. ie anyone who looks Latino. Regardless of being a born American, a legal immigrant or someone who crossed illegally. IOW, no due process and it is the beginning of "brownshirts" basically.

Texas does not have the resources to do massive sweeps that you dream about. But according to the law they passed, if someone crosses they can be immediately returned to Mexico. There is no due process needed for jumping the border. Deporting people that are here illegally is righting a wrong.

What has happened is that Texas is filling a void that Biden created. Texas has been begging the Biden administration to get a handle on the invasion of illegal immigrants and has been ignored.

Biden didn't create this problem. We've been in need of immigration reform specific to migrants seeking to enter through our southern border for decades. Some policies that were put in place as short term fixes have been reversed or not extended in recent years and that has made the problem worse some of that blame may fall on the Biden Administration but we need to focus on long term solutions through comprehensive immigration reform. Per US Immigration Law, asylum seekers have to be present in the US in order to apply. This law needs to be changed to allow asylum seekers currently residing in North, Central, and South America (or anywhere in the world if feasible) to apply through US Embassies in their home countries. This would require a large investment in people and resources in those countries but no more of an investment than what the US taxpayer is currently facing with any solutions that involve speeding up the asylum application process and housing/supporting the migrants while they're here. Secure the border completely, stop allowing migrants seeking asylum into the country until their asylum claim is processed, and offset these
measures with investment abroad to allow for a proper, speedy, and humane process of granting or denying asylum to those that apply. There is no legitimate and humane long term solution that involves hundreds of thousands of people making long and dangerous journeys through our southern border to take advantage of our flawed and slow asylum process.

What a BS statement.
It has NEVER - in the history of our country - been this bad, Never.
This is Joe Biden's doing.

Anonymous wrote:We do have a border. The problem is that our system cannot process the asylum claims quickly enough. Hence another reason legislation is needed, to authorize and fund more adjudicators to hear cases expeditiously so people can be legally deported out of the country more quickly.

The GOP is opposed to this.