Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would hope so. Qualitative insights trump quantitative any day.
Are you kidding? No, the opinion of a second grade teacher who has minimal to zero training in identifying giftedness and has only known a student for 2-4 months in a class of 25-30, does not trump quantitative data.
I thought that the qualitative trumps quantitative poster was being facetious, but who knows? I'd go with quantitative/objective alone, if there were enough data points. Like iReady, NNAT, CogAT, OLSAT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would hope so. Qualitative insights trump quantitative any day.
Are you kidding? No, the opinion of a second grade teacher who has minimal to zero training in identifying giftedness and has only known a student for 2-4 months in a class of 25-30, does not trump quantitative data.
I thought that the qualitative trumps quantitative poster was being facetious, but who knows? I'd go with quantitative/objective alone, if there were enough data points. Like iReady, NNAT, CogAT, OLSAT.
Anonymous wrote:I would hope so. Qualitative insights trump quantitative any day.
Are you kidding? No, the opinion of a second grade teacher who has minimal to zero training in identifying giftedness and has only known a student for 2-4 months in a class of 25-30, does not trump quantitative data.
Anonymous wrote:If anything - folks correct me if I'm wrong here - it seems like the teacher form and rest of the packet may be more important than test scores, right? (Saying this as a mom with great test scores and not a super great teacher evaluation, frankly.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anything - folks correct me if I'm wrong here - it seems like the teacher form and rest of the packet may be more important than test scores, right? (Saying this as a mom with great test scores and not a super great teacher evaluation, frankly.)
No one really knows,but DCUM consensus seems to be that HOPE/GBRS scores matter the most.
That's based on a report by an outside committee from 2020 that said that for any given CogAT, a kid with a higher GBRS was 50% (!) more likely to get in than a kid with a lower one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anything - folks correct me if I'm wrong here - it seems like the teacher form and rest of the packet may be more important than test scores, right? (Saying this as a mom with great test scores and not a super great teacher evaluation, frankly.)
No one really knows,but DCUM consensus seems to be that HOPE/GBRS scores matter the most.
Anonymous wrote:If anything - folks correct me if I'm wrong here - it seems like the teacher form and rest of the packet may be more important than test scores, right? (Saying this as a mom with great test scores and not a super great teacher evaluation, frankly.)
Anonymous wrote:Starting to think we’re not gonna see those emails today.
Anonymous wrote:Thi is so helpful. Since we are all here, can you smart folks help me with a basic question.
Is there an actual, hard COGAT cut-off score for AAP or is it more case-by-case?
Anonymous wrote:Thi is so helpful. Since we are all here, can you smart folks help me with a basic question.
Is there an actual, hard COGAT cut-off score for AAP or is it more case-by-case?