Anonymous wrote:So what would be a good career for someone who doesn’t like math or stem? Are they just destined for middle of the road jobs and barely scraping by ? My child doesn’t want to be at a desk, hates math, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds depressing. I was an art major and made $80k right after graduation. That was in 2002s dollars
You don't understand statistics, but then, you're an art major.
I'm work in statistics and I think PP does understand: you can't predict a single outcome from averages across such a broad category--especially one that does zero modeling of predictive factors and ignores important variabilities across institutions and important factors across time periods (e.g., what is the lifetime ROI). A better way to draw insight is that for any given person the profession that they are most likely to earn well in is the one where their skills and interests are the highest and that overlaps with an area that society is willing to pay. That is where an individual is likely to find their highest salary in an evolving career that will sustain over their lifetime. Much more sensible to introspect on that on some dumb averages about salary at 5 years that strips away all the predictive factors that will shape your individual outcome.
If you are really in stats, then you should understand what median income and this list means.
I know what it means, I'm just arguing it doesn't matter all that much.
That's ironic coming from a stats person.
I explained my reasoning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds depressing. I was an art major and made $80k right after graduation. That was in 2002s dollars
You don't understand statistics, but then, you're an art major.
I'm work in statistics and I think PP does understand: you can't predict a single outcome from averages across such a broad category--especially one that does zero modeling of predictive factors and ignores important variabilities across institutions and important factors across time periods (e.g., what is the lifetime ROI). A better way to draw insight is that for any given person the profession that they are most likely to earn well in is the one where their skills and interests are the highest and that overlaps with an area that society is willing to pay. That is where an individual is likely to find their highest salary in an evolving career that will sustain over their lifetime. Much more sensible to introspect on that on some dumb averages about salary at 5 years that strips away all the predictive factors that will shape your individual outcome.
If you are really in stats, then you should understand what median income and this list means.
I know what it means, I'm just arguing it doesn't matter all that much.
That's ironic coming from a stats person.
Anonymous wrote:So what would be a good career for someone who doesn’t like math or stem? Are they just destined for middle of the road jobs and barely scraping by ? My child doesn’t want to be at a desk, hates math, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Engineers are hot out of the gate. There’s a natural ceiling though unless they move into management
It would interesting to see a comparison of 35 year old individual contributor engineers vs Director level folks with those dreaded Liberal Arts or Marketing degrees
Chance of a person with an engineering degree moving into management vs a person with liberal arts/marketing.
Where do you want to bet your money?
We are talking statistics, not some random anecdotes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds depressing. I was an art major and made $80k right after graduation. That was in 2002s dollars
You don't understand statistics, but then, you're an art major.
I'm work in statistics and I think PP does understand: you can't predict a single outcome from averages across such a broad category--especially one that does zero modeling of predictive factors and ignores important variabilities across institutions and important factors across time periods (e.g., what is the lifetime ROI). A better way to draw insight is that for any given person the profession that they are most likely to earn well in is the one where their skills and interests are the highest and that overlaps with an area that society is willing to pay. That is where an individual is likely to find their highest salary in an evolving career that will sustain over their lifetime. Much more sensible to introspect on that on some dumb averages about salary at 5 years that strips away all the predictive factors that will shape your individual outcome.
If you are really in stats, then you should understand what median income and this list means.
I know what it means, I'm just arguing it doesn't matter all that much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds depressing. I was an art major and made $80k right after graduation. That was in 2002s dollars
You don't understand statistics, but then, you're an art major.
I'm work in statistics and I think PP does understand: you can't predict a single outcome from averages across such a broad category--especially one that does zero modeling of predictive factors and ignores important variabilities across institutions and important factors across time periods (e.g., what is the lifetime ROI). A better way to draw insight is that for any given person the profession that they are most likely to earn well in is the one where their skills and interests are the highest and that overlaps with an area that society is willing to pay. That is where an individual is likely to find their highest salary in an evolving career that will sustain over their lifetime. Much more sensible to introspect on that on some dumb averages about salary at 5 years that strips away all the predictive factors that will shape your individual outcome.
If you are really in stats, then you should understand what median income and this list means.
Anonymous wrote:This is five years after graduation. Further out it is the doctors who are making bank.
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/highest-paying.htm
Anonymous wrote:Theater majors still employed in major between 35-45 are highest paid by far of all majors. I saw a chart once. Sure 90-95 percent of them are no longer working actors but the ones remaining are movie, TV and Broadway stars