Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just jumping in to also complain about the lack of schedule. SFL would have already had it published. Come on, our age group usually only has one division. How hard can it be? Demosphere automatically does the scheduling and scheduling is basically the only job the NCSL has for the rec side, they aren't staffing the games with referees or doing anything else.
Travel games start the SAME DAY but their schedules have been out for weeks. It shows a disregard for rec side customers.
This whining complaining is why SFL quit. Be grateful NCSL picked it up or you’d have nothing.
Its a lucrative business. They picked it up to make money, not out of altruism. They had no problems getting the travel schedules out weeks before the games started and those are much more complicated.
And the travel season starts earlier and they pay more. You get what you pay for.
Honestly they should just eliminate rec at U13. If you are not on travel by then your kid is really just pretending to play a sport and likely doing it just to placate the parents. If they did eliminate, then they could also eliminate a lot of travel teams as well which is really no different for any C or D team, except parents pay trying to buy improvement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just jumping in to also complain about the lack of schedule. SFL would have already had it published. Come on, our age group usually only has one division. How hard can it be? Demosphere automatically does the scheduling and scheduling is basically the only job the NCSL has for the rec side, they aren't staffing the games with referees or doing anything else.
Travel games start the SAME DAY but their schedules have been out for weeks. It shows a disregard for rec side customers.
This whining complaining is why SFL quit. Be grateful NCSL picked it up or you’d have nothing.
Its a lucrative business. They picked it up to make money, not out of altruism. They had no problems getting the travel schedules out weeks before the games started and those are much more complicated.
Anonymous wrote:there are some obscure places on that list that I have never heard of. Champions FC? Alliance?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice that NCSl added a "new" rec club that didn't participate in SFL previously?
They are in FREDERICKSBURG.
There is no way we are driving to Fredericksburg for a rec soccer game. Someone has lost their mind, thinking people will be on board with that.
+1 We already skip soccer on the hill games for the same reason
The farthest place we've had to go is that crappy grass field complex in Warrenton, but that's right around the corner compared to Fredericksburg.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice that NCSl added a "new" rec club that didn't participate in SFL previously?
They are in FREDERICKSBURG.
There is no way we are driving to Fredericksburg for a rec soccer game. Someone has lost their mind, thinking people will be on board with that.
+1 We already skip soccer on the hill games for the same reason
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice that NCSl added a "new" rec club that didn't participate in SFL previously?
They are in FREDERICKSBURG.
There is no way we are driving to Fredericksburg for a rec soccer game. Someone has lost their mind, thinking people will be on board with that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: why does NCSL have SO many divisions on the travel side? Is there any noticeable difference between travel teams in division 6 and division 8-seems a bit silly.)
I see one club has its lower level team in a higher division. Presumably they were properly placed, and then one got relegated while the other was promoted.
What are you talking about?
Looking at the divisions, in a particular age group. One club has its C team in a lower division than its D team.
If a team is in a higher division, it is the de facto
"C" team and the other team is the D team.
By definition.
Which club/teams?