Anonymous wrote:For the non Sidwell parents of the world...what is Math III/IV?
Anonymous wrote:Your kid is academically qualified for anywhere—as will be 75% of everywhere’s applicants. The question is what institutional need do you fill to take you rather than any of the other 14 academically qualified kids in your bucket.
Anonymous wrote:If kid is interested, I’d take a shot at one of the Ivies that just went back to test required. Likely will be less noise without the test optional applicants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does the school college counselor say?
The counselor is not going to be useful.....they will only make sure you have reasonable safety schools and will say the obvious that there could be a chance at T10 but it's unpredictable. (This is assuming this person has no hooks.)
But DCUM will be useful?
Seriously, what are you paying for?
Honestly, I learned infinitely more about college landscape from DCUM than I ever learned from Sidwell CCO - We learned zero from them. So - I definitely didn't pay Sidwell for college counseling advice. I paid them for a great education. That's about it. Not much more.
Sidwell CCO is totally useless.
Anonymous wrote:I’m not trying to be a jerk, but there are a lot of kids at Sidwell with SAT scores in that range. In a Sidwell context, which is how he/she will be evaluated, the 1570 is not that much of a differentiator. Sidwell kids applying to T10 schools will have high SAT/ACT scores and typically be submitting many AP scores (including BC calculus) with 5s. Add classmates’ legacy status to this, if your kid is unhooked like mine was, and it’s a tough battle. If OP is a NMSF that tends to count for something extra because it’s viewed as a purer measurement given that it’s just taken once and for many kids it’s the first go at an SAT-like test, and not the product of over the top tutoring and multiple tries. I am trying to be brutally honest with you. My unhooked kid who attended Sidwell is at a T10 Ivy and had >3.95, highest rigor, and higher SAT than OP, all 5s on APs, NMSF and still got deferred in the early round, but eventually in. Go in assuming ED/EA to T10 will not be successful but probably worth a try. Be prepared for what comes after that.
Anonymous wrote:I’m not trying to be a jerk, but there are a lot of kids at Sidwell with SAT scores in that range. In a Sidwell context, which is how he/she will be evaluated, the 1570 is not that much of a differentiator. Sidwell kids applying to T10 schools will have high SAT/ACT scores and typically be submitting many AP scores (including BC calculus) with 5s. Add classmates’ legacy status to this, if your kid is unhooked like mine was, and it’s a tough battle. If OP is a NMSF that tends to count for something extra because it’s viewed as a purer measurement given that it’s just taken once and for many kids it’s the first go at an SAT-like test, and not the product of over the top tutoring and multiple tries. I am trying to be brutally honest with you. My unhooked kid who attended Sidwell is at a T10 Ivy and had >3.95, highest rigor, and higher SAT than OP, all 5s on APs, NMSF and still got deferred in the early round, but eventually in. Go in assuming ED/EA to T10 will not be successful but probably worth a try. Be prepared for what comes after that.
Anonymous wrote:Kid is non-stem. Why are people so fixated on stem?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does the school college counselor say?
The counselor is not going to be useful.....they will only make sure you have reasonable safety schools and will say the obvious that there could be a chance at T10 but it's unpredictable. (This is assuming this person has no hooks.)
But DCUM will be useful?
Seriously, what are you paying for?
Honestly, I learned infinitely more about college landscape from DCUM than I ever learned from Sidwell CCO - We learned zero from them. So - I definitely didn't pay Sidwell for college counseling advice. I paid them for a great education. That's about it. Not much more.