Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard offers the best liberal arts education in social science, economics, humanities, etc. It also has the best STEM programs in the Ivy. Harvard consistently ranks #2 in college math competition behind MIT. If you want to experience MIT's engineering/cs, you could take classes there. Having a top business school, public policy, law, and medical schools also gives undergrads a lot of opportunities for research. If the grade inflation stuff is true, that will be another bonus. And there are a lot you can do in Boston.
You are delusional if you think Harvard is well regarded in STEM.
Harvard engineering ranks below UC-Boulder, Maryland, USC, UC-San Diego, UIUC, Georgia Tech, and Purdue. Not to mention MIT, Stanford, CalTech, Duke, NU, Michigan, CMU, Texas, UCLa, Berkeley and many more. Even in the Ivy League, which is not particularly impressive in engineering or CS, Princeton, Cornell, Penn, and Columbia all rank higher.
For undergrad, Harvard is very mediocre in the hard subjects. Many, many schools are much better in the majors that require actual brain power.
Anonymous wrote:I went to Harvard and HBS. The arrogance and elitism really irritated me then and irritate me now. “Of course it’s the best because it’s Haaaaarvard” pretty much sums it up. Definitely being told you are the best all the time result in a lot of stuffed heads.
Anonymous wrote:For a top university Harvard seems to have some boastful yet weirdly insecure alumni.
Anonymous wrote:Harvard has the best students, so why the student should not have the best (highest) gpa?
I'm not confident that their students are actually better academically. Higher average SAT scores at MIT, CalTech, UChicago etc. Roughly comparable scores at Princeton. All four have way way lower average GPAs.
Identical kid at Harvard would likely walk away with a better GPA compared to the other four.
As far as extracurriculars and leadership it wouldn't surprise me if they are truly the best. I get the sense that Harvard really likes student government types.
Harvard has the best students, so why the student should not have the best (highest) gpa?
Anonymous wrote:Harvard has the best students, so why the student should not have the best (highest) gpa?
As someone who has worked in admissions at a highly ranked professional school, I don't actually think the grade inflation at some of these schools helps most students much. It is harder to distinguish between students, which helps students who may well be weaker but who do more beyond just getting good grades. It also helps connected people more easily get internships with only slightly lower GPAs. Back when there were huge numbers of open spots, it didn't matter as much.
Anonymous wrote:Harvard offers the best liberal arts education in social science, economics, humanities, etc. It also has the best STEM programs in the Ivy. Harvard consistently ranks #2 in college math competition behind MIT. If you want to experience MIT's engineering/cs, you could take classes there. Having a top business school, public policy, law, and medical schools also gives undergrads a lot of opportunities for research. If the grade inflation stuff is true, that will be another bonus. And there are a lot you can do in Boston.
Anonymous wrote:Harvard offers the best liberal arts education in social science, economics, humanities, etc. It also has the best STEM programs in the Ivy. Harvard consistently ranks #2 in college math competition behind MIT. If you want to experience MIT's engineering/cs, you could take classes there. Having a top business school, public policy, law, and medical schools also gives undergrads a lot of opportunities for research. If the grade inflation stuff is true, that will be another bonus. And there are a lot you can do in Boston.
It also has the best STEM programs in the Ivy.
If the grade inflation stuff is true, that will be another bonus.