Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I finally met a lovely man. I think he runs deficit of about $700 every month. He works his tail off and didn't buy anything outrages. It's temporary and I will gladly help him fix it. I would even help him if we weren't together.
Really? You would financially help a single adult man? Mega turn off.
Yeah, nope. I’ve established my life independently and am not tying myself to just another dead weight.
So what kind of income/wealth do you expect a man to have?
Enough disposable income to match mine. Enough free time to match mine.
Sure, but what constitutes matching yours?
I'm a woman make about 300K a year. My average weekend outing is about $150; I take one large vacation a year at about $20K, couple small trips in the range of $5k. So it's about $15,000 on travel and $3600 on dates that a BF would need to match my expenses on entertainment and travel only. If we move in together, we would be saving on mortgage/rent so not a bad deal for him overall
I’m similar to you financially as are most of my friends. We’ve all come to realize that we are the ones that can afford our lifestyle. It means we don’t date and while we miss it, we don’t miss the drama that goes along with being in a relationship. We go out together on the weekends and always have a good time. And we travel together. I haven’t met a man in a similar financial situation yet.
Yea, because if he makes less he will resent the woman for making more, will be emasculated causing all the relationship drama. I tried to subsidize men financially, it didn't work out well either (these were professional men making about 200K but with CS obligtions which I don't have). So I guess single wealthy women should prepare for solitude entering elderly years
You want the older widowers. The ones I know were happily married, have adult children, and now have substantial assets but no one to share their lives with. We’re talking 60s and 70s.
I’ll focus on them in my 50s and 60s if I still feel like dating at that point. For now I have a younger FWB as I’m mid 40s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't you ladies ever enjoy -some- downscaled experiences? Less elaborate, expensive travel. Less costly entertainment. No one is flexible?
It wears thin. I’m able to expand my world as my kids go off to college- not willing to restrict my options because of limited finances in a partner.
DP. You can expand your world on more limited budgets. No need to stay in fancy hotels, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I finally met a lovely man. I think he runs deficit of about $700 every month. He works his tail off and didn't buy anything outrages. It's temporary and I will gladly help him fix it. I would even help him if we weren't together.
Really? You would financially help a single adult man? Mega turn off.
Yeah, nope. I’ve established my life independently and am not tying myself to just another dead weight.
So what kind of income/wealth do you expect a man to have?
Enough disposable income to match mine. Enough free time to match mine.
Sure, but what constitutes matching yours?
I'm a woman make about 300K a year. My average weekend outing is about $150; I take one large vacation a year at about $20K, couple small trips in the range of $5k. So it's about $15,000 on travel and $3600 on dates that a BF would need to match my expenses on entertainment and travel only. If we move in together, we would be saving on mortgage/rent so not a bad deal for him overall
I’m similar to you financially as are most of my friends. We’ve all come to realize that we are the ones that can afford our lifestyle. It means we don’t date and while we miss it, we don’t miss the drama that goes along with being in a relationship. We go out together on the weekends and always have a good time. And we travel together. I haven’t met a man in a similar financial situation yet.
Yea, because if he makes less he will resent the woman for making more, will be emasculated causing all the relationship drama. I tried to subsidize men financially, it didn't work out well either (these were professional men making about 200K but with CS obligtions which I don't have). So I guess single wealthy women should prepare for solitude entering elderly years
You want the older widowers. The ones I know were happily married, have adult children, and now have substantial assets but no one to share their lives with. We’re talking 60s and 70s.
I’ll focus on them in my 50s and 60s if I still feel like dating at that point. For now I have a younger FWB as I’m mid 40s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, they are not all broke. I personally know a very, very wealthy, very successful man who did on line dating after his divorce. (His ex cheated on him.) He ended up meeting and marrying a woman through friends, but for about a year, he was out there on-line. I was a little surprised to be honest, but it happened.
Yea, I dated a law partner who was making couple million/year, a VP of a large consulting company ($500k/year) and a Fed with good GS-15 salary plus military pension, so probably at 350K annual income. OP is just not attractive to these types
LOL. SES is like 170 and a platinum pension is maybe 75k so far from 300k sweetie. Keep trollin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I finally met a lovely man. I think he runs deficit of about $700 every month. He works his tail off and didn't buy anything outrages. It's temporary and I will gladly help him fix it. I would even help him if we weren't together.
Really? You would financially help a single adult man? Mega turn off.
Yeah, nope. I’ve established my life independently and am not tying myself to just another dead weight.
So what kind of income/wealth do you expect a man to have?
Enough disposable income to match mine. Enough free time to match mine.
Sure, but what constitutes matching yours?
I'm a woman make about 300K a year. My average weekend outing is about $150; I take one large vacation a year at about $20K, couple small trips in the range of $5k. So it's about $15,000 on travel and $3600 on dates that a BF would need to match my expenses on entertainment and travel only. If we move in together, we would be saving on mortgage/rent so not a bad deal for him overall
I’m similar to you financially as are most of my friends. We’ve all come to realize that we are the ones that can afford our lifestyle. It means we don’t date and while we miss it, we don’t miss the drama that goes along with being in a relationship. We go out together on the weekends and always have a good time. And we travel together. I haven’t met a man in a similar financial situation yet.
Yea, because if he makes less he will resent the woman for making more, will be emasculated causing all the relationship drama. I tried to subsidize men financially, it didn't work out well either (these were professional men making about 200K but with CS obligtions which I don't have). So I guess single wealthy women should prepare for solitude entering elderly years
You want the older widowers. The ones I know were happily married, have adult children, and now have substantial assets but no one to share their lives with. We’re talking 60s and 70s.
Anonymous wrote:Can't you ladies ever enjoy -some- downscaled experiences? Less elaborate, expensive travel. Less costly entertainment. No one is flexible?
Anonymous wrote:From personal experience, these men don't need OLD.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly, as a man, I am tired of this trope. No, not all men are Bruce Wayne, and truthfully it doesn't make you any less of a man. There are great fathers, husbands, and just plain men who aren't living the world's-most-interesting-man life. Are there duds out there? Yes, just like many women (boobs and all) aren't always the best catch.
So, OP, sorry that not all your frogs turn into King Midas, but no need to denigrate all men because they don't meet whatever standard you've penciled into your head.
Best of luck...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I finally met a lovely man. I think he runs deficit of about $700 every month. He works his tail off and didn't buy anything outrages. It's temporary and I will gladly help him fix it. I would even help him if we weren't together.
Really? You would financially help a single adult man? Mega turn off.
Yeah, nope. I’ve established my life independently and am not tying myself to just another dead weight.
So what kind of income/wealth do you expect a man to have?
Enough disposable income to match mine. Enough free time to match mine.
Sure, but what constitutes matching yours?
I'm a woman make about 300K a year. My average weekend outing is about $150; I take one large vacation a year at about $20K, couple small trips in the range of $5k. So it's about $15,000 on travel and $3600 on dates that a BF would need to match my expenses on entertainment and travel only. If we move in together, we would be saving on mortgage/rent so not a bad deal for him overall
I’m similar to you financially as are most of my friends. We’ve all come to realize that we are the ones that can afford our lifestyle. It means we don’t date and while we miss it, we don’t miss the drama that goes along with being in a relationship. We go out together on the weekends and always have a good time. And we travel together. I haven’t met a man in a similar financial situation yet.
Sincere question: are you Black? All of the details in the previous 2 posts ring true for my Black professional female acquaintances. I''m not so sure they actually clear >$300K (unless they have some small biz side gig?) but they live life on IG as if they do.
And they don't date, for the most part. In Maryland, fwiw
I'm white. In MD as well. My old college friends are also in similar situations in CA, Fla, and NY.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wealthy men don’t need OLD to find a date. They are like a flame to moths.
Probably this.
Anonymous wrote:I'm cheap af, and also poor by DC standards (only $1 million in the bank and $200k income).
But the bigger problem is that I have no intention of dissipating my wealth on an over-the-hill woman.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't you ladies ever enjoy -some- downscaled experiences? Less elaborate, expensive travel. Less costly entertainment. No one is flexible?
It wears thin. I’m able to expand my world as my kids go off to college- not willing to restrict my options because of limited finances in a partner.
Anonymous wrote:I guess I am one of the "broke" lucky one. I make 70k/yr as a music teacher, and am married to a woman who makes 2M+ per year with a trust fund, but I am a tall and good-looking dude if that matters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't you ladies ever enjoy -some- downscaled experiences? Less elaborate, expensive travel. Less costly entertainment. No one is flexible?
It wears thin. I’m able to expand my world as my kids go off to college- not willing to restrict my options because of limited finances in a partner.