Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're asking about the 401k, but by 40 you should try backdoor contributions to a Roth IRA as well.
Can a brokerage firm or advisor help with the mechanics of this?
Anonymous wrote:I’m 37 and have 150k.
Anonymous wrote:Well my TSP has 20k in it since I just got back into the workforce, but I have 250k in a Roth IRA and another 85k in a Traditional IRA that I rolled over when I left my prior employer. I did not work for 8 years due to kids but put as much in as I could right after college. I also did lot of Roth conversions along the way. My spouse has been maxing their TSP for years so I assume they probably have at least double what I do. We're late 30's/early 40's.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the rule of thumb for 40 is 3x your salary
Terrible rule of thumb and is completely unattainable for most people
How is it unattainable?
If you make 100k, you think it's ridiculous to have 300k after 18 years of working?
If you saved 10% of your income + company match, with below avg growth you would have well over 300k
Um.....between myself and my employers, it's over 10% and I don't have 300 K. I'm over 200 K.
It's more like $7K per year because I don't make that much money. Under $100K. More than the average salary though!
I think your perception is a little off because you are probably much wealthier than average.
starting at 0, 18yrs at 10k a year all in (including employer) contributions growing at 8% is 404k. EVen at 6% its 328k
Your returns must be quite low.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the rule of thumb for 40 is 3x your salary
Terrible rule of thumb and is completely unattainable for most people
How is it unattainable?
If you make 100k, you think it's ridiculous to have 300k after 18 years of working?
If you saved 10% of your income + company match, with below avg growth you would have well over 300k
Um.....between myself and my employers, it's over 10% and I don't have 300 K. I'm over 200 K.
It's more like $7K per year because I don't make that much money. Under $100K. More than the average salary though!
I think your perception is a little off because you are probably much wealthier than average.
starting at 0, 18yrs at 10k a year all in (including employer) contributions growing at 8% is 404k. EVen at 6% its 328k
Your returns must be quite low.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the rule of thumb for 40 is 3x your salary
Terrible rule of thumb and is completely unattainable for most people
How is it unattainable?
If you make 100k, you think it's ridiculous to have 300k after 18 years of working?
If you saved 10% of your income + company match, with below avg growth you would have well over 300k
Um.....between myself and my employers, it's over 10% and I don't have 300 K. I'm over 200 K.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're asking about the 401k, but by 40 you should try backdoor contributions to a Roth IRA as well.
Can a brokerage firm or advisor help with the mechanics of this?
Not all employers allow backdoor Roth, including the federal government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're asking about the 401k, but by 40 you should try backdoor contributions to a Roth IRA as well.
Can a brokerage firm or advisor help with the mechanics of this?
Anonymous wrote:You're asking about the 401k, but by 40 you should try backdoor contributions to a Roth IRA as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This! I am 42 with around $200k. How did you achieve this??
Anonymous wrote:I had $206,000 in my 401k when I was 40. Have $1.4 million now at 53.
Curious as well. But I think it is maxing out contribution, very good match, plus aggressively invested.