Anonymous wrote:Think of it as a compliment. This is not something to get upset about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I gave my first born son a well known- but not currently well used- boys name. Think "Warren" or similar. I have since had two friends name their sons the same thing, from different circles in my life, and each time the friend has sheepishly given me a sort of heads up. Like, "we can't think of a traditional name for our second boy! We have it narrowed down but, interestingly, DH really likes Warren... haha... I know, right? Would that be weird? Like I'm not saying it's going to be his name for sure!! But like.... if it was... I mean would you mind?"
I was able to chalk the first one up to coincidence- and also, if you want a traditional boys name, it can be tough to pick one not overused!- but not the second one.
But, whatever. Mine is older so we know who came first!
Names go in and out of fashion all the time! Eventually Eugene and Wayne will be back. Right now the resurgence of Flynn, Henry, and Hayden. But where have all the Davids, Peters, and Russells gone - out of fashion that's where. Not one in either of my kids' classes and I would have 2 or 3 in my class at the same age.
Anonymous wrote:I gave my first born son a well known- but not currently well used- boys name. Think "Warren" or similar. I have since had two friends name their sons the same thing, from different circles in my life, and each time the friend has sheepishly given me a sort of heads up. Like, "we can't think of a traditional name for our second boy! We have it narrowed down but, interestingly, DH really likes Warren... haha... I know, right? Would that be weird? Like I'm not saying it's going to be his name for sure!! But like.... if it was... I mean would you mind?"
I was able to chalk the first one up to coincidence- and also, if you want a traditional boys name, it can be tough to pick one not overused!- but not the second one.
But, whatever. Mine is older so we know who came first!
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s weird that your close friend had a baby 2 weeks ago and you didn’t know the name until you went to her house.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Think of it as a compliment. This is not something to get upset about.
+1
You copied your family's names and unless you're making something up all names are copied from one's you like. Just move on!
In my religion, it's not copying. It's keeping the memory of a deceased relative alive by naming a new relative after them.
Anonymous wrote:Oh PLEASE. Get over yourself. What, Henry, Ben, Michael? Even if it’s Brayden, Caden, Jayden, Braxton, Jackson, Brantley, WHO CARES.
Shut up. You didn’t make any of those names up. Even if you are a ****CREATIVE MOMMMMMMM**** with a little Slate McGraw.
Anonymous wrote:My son is 3 years old. She copied his first and middle name. When we went over yesterday to meet the baby and bring a gift (she had the baby at the end of the month) she was like "Surprise! We liked [son's name] so much we decided to give it to our baby, isn't that awesome?!"
Except we picked his name based on family members whose memories we want to keep alive. She just ... copied us. Obviously we don't have a monopoly or anything but to copy BOTH the first AND middle names? It's weird, right? I'm trying to let it go but having a hard time.