Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NVA got 2 age groups only but NVA still want to be considered for next year, they need to know what to do with Girls ECNL side.
Its a matter of time they go MLS next.
NVA was given full slate, not 2. But declined.
There is no chance NVA gives up ECNL on the girls side. I am not saying they can’t get mlsnext just that it will not be at the expense of girls ECNL. They are not going to GA.
Can they thread that needle? They can try. We will see.
Definitley a slippery slope. What happens when they start losing boys.. which one matters most
If a neightbor club gets MLS NEXT in the next few years they will lose their entire player pool. They have to be very careful
+1. This is a significant part of the reason Union and BRAVE are in the boat they are in. SYC’s 2012 MLS Next II team is on level with Arlington and Loudoun’s top 12 boys teams…their 1st team is well beyond either. MLS Next vs ECNL boys is a losing battle.
I did see SYC 2012 B team beat Arlington top team 5-0 at Arlington tournament.
They haven’t hit puberty. Just wait until high school to see how things will change.
Anonymous wrote:Why would they decline mls next if they applied? Doesn’t make sense
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For Boys ECNL and MLSnext are routes for college exposure. Those coaches are put thru more rigor. Even diluted as it is those ECNL teams kill NCSL and EDP teams.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, they announced an ECNL coaching staff so anybody with any ability to use logic can assume they will play in the ECNL.
What's an ECNL coaching staff?
How is it different from NCSL or EDP coaching staff?
This is all rhetoric. Where are the facts, truths, data and verifiable evidence to substantiate the claim?
What advanced training, certifications, licenses do ECNL coaches have over coaches in NCSL, MSI and EDP?
ECNL btw is below MLS Next in college recruitment exposure.
Some of you love to talk about the faux superiority of ECNL over EDP for example. Do you have any idea how many players playing in MLS Next came from being developed at EDP teams?
You can literally look up the coaches. And it’s a fact they have monopolies on various showcases that colleges go to. If you cant get in top 2 brackets. Forget about a coach randomly seeing your kid.
Boy’s? Because that is not true at all of Ecnl girls. Two mid team will have over 100 college coaches for each game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NVA got 2 age groups only but NVA still want to be considered for next year, they need to know what to do with Girls ECNL side.
Its a matter of time they go MLS next.
NVA was given full slate, not 2. But declined.
There is no chance NVA gives up ECNL on the girls side. I am not saying they can’t get mlsnext just that it will not be at the expense of girls ECNL. They are not going to GA.
Can they thread that needle? They can try. We will see.
Definitley a slippery slope. What happens when they start losing boys.. which one matters most
Which brings in more $$$?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For Boys ECNL and MLSnext are routes for college exposure. Those coaches are put thru more rigor. Even diluted as it is those ECNL teams kill NCSL and EDP teams.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, they announced an ECNL coaching staff so anybody with any ability to use logic can assume they will play in the ECNL.
What's an ECNL coaching staff?
How is it different from NCSL or EDP coaching staff?
This is all rhetoric. Where are the facts, truths, data and verifiable evidence to substantiate the claim?
What advanced training, certifications, licenses do ECNL coaches have over coaches in NCSL, MSI and EDP?
ECNL btw is below MLS Next in college recruitment exposure.
Some of you love to talk about the faux superiority of ECNL over EDP for example. Do you have any idea how many players playing in MLS Next came from being developed at EDP teams?
You can literally look up the coaches. And it’s a fact they have monopolies on various showcases that colleges go to. If you cant get in top 2 brackets. Forget about a coach randomly seeing your kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NVA got 2 age groups only but NVA still want to be considered for next year, they need to know what to do with Girls ECNL side.
Its a matter of time they go MLS next.
NVA was given full slate, not 2. But declined.
There is no chance NVA gives up ECNL on the girls side. I am not saying they can’t get mlsnext just that it will not be at the expense of girls ECNL. They are not going to GA.
Can they thread that needle? They can try. We will see.
Definitley a slippery slope. What happens when they start losing boys.. which one matters most
If a neightbor club gets MLS NEXT in the next few years they will lose their entire player pool. They have to be very careful
+1. This is a significant part of the reason Union and BRAVE are in the boat they are in. SYC’s 2012 MLS Next II team is on level with Arlington and Loudoun’s top 12 boys teams…their 1st team is well beyond either. MLS Next vs ECNL boys is a losing battle.
I did see SYC 2012 B team beat Arlington top team 5-0 at Arlington tournament.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NVA got 2 age groups only but NVA still want to be considered for next year, they need to know what to do with Girls ECNL side.
Its a matter of time they go MLS next.
NVA was given full slate, not 2. But declined.
There is no chance NVA gives up ECNL on the girls side. I am not saying they can’t get mlsnext just that it will not be at the expense of girls ECNL. They are not going to GA.
Can they thread that needle? They can try. We will see.
Definitley a slippery slope. What happens when they start losing boys.. which one matters most
If a neightbor club gets MLS NEXT in the next few years they will lose their entire player pool. They have to be very careful
+1. This is a significant part of the reason Union and BRAVE are in the boat they are in. SYC’s 2012 MLS Next II team is on level with Arlington and Loudoun’s top 12 boys teams…their 1st team is well beyond either. MLS Next vs ECNL boys is a losing battle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For Boys ECNL and MLSnext are routes for college exposure. Those coaches are put thru more rigor. Even diluted as it is those ECNL teams kill NCSL and EDP teams.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, they announced an ECNL coaching staff so anybody with any ability to use logic can assume they will play in the ECNL.
What's an ECNL coaching staff?
How is it different from NCSL or EDP coaching staff?
This is all rhetoric. Where are the facts, truths, data and verifiable evidence to substantiate the claim?
What advanced training, certifications, licenses do ECNL coaches have over coaches in NCSL, MSI and EDP?
ECNL btw is below MLS Next in college recruitment exposure.
Some of you love to talk about the faux superiority of ECNL over EDP for example. Do you have any idea how many players playing in MLS Next came from being developed at EDP teams?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NVA got 2 age groups only but NVA still want to be considered for next year, they need to know what to do with Girls ECNL side.
Its a matter of time they go MLS next.
NVA was given full slate, not 2. But declined.
There is no chance NVA gives up ECNL on the girls side. I am not saying they can’t get mlsnext just that it will not be at the expense of girls ECNL. They are not going to GA.
Can they thread that needle? They can try. We will see.
Definitley a slippery slope. What happens when they start losing boys.. which one matters most
If a neightbor club gets MLS NEXT in the next few years they will lose their entire player pool. They have to be very careful
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NVA got 2 age groups only but NVA still want to be considered for next year, they need to know what to do with Girls ECNL side.
Its a matter of time they go MLS next.
NVA was given full slate, not 2. But declined.
There is no chance NVA gives up ECNL on the girls side. I am not saying they can’t get mlsnext just that it will not be at the expense of girls ECNL. They are not going to GA.
Can they thread that needle? They can try. We will see.
Definitley a slippery slope. What happens when they start losing boys.. which one matters most
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NVA got 2 age groups only but NVA still want to be considered for next year, they need to know what to do with Girls ECNL side.
Its a matter of time they go MLS next.
NVA was given full slate, not 2. But declined.
There is no chance NVA gives up ECNL on the girls side. I am not saying they can’t get mlsnext just that it will not be at the expense of girls ECNL. They are not going to GA.
Can they thread that needle? They can try. We will see.
Definitley a slippery slope. What happens when they start losing boys.. which one matters most
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NVA got 2 age groups only but NVA still want to be considered for next year, they need to know what to do with Girls ECNL side.
Its a matter of time they go MLS next.
NVA was given full slate, not 2. But declined.
There is no chance NVA gives up ECNL on the girls side. I am not saying they can’t get mlsnext just that it will not be at the expense of girls ECNL. They are not going to GA.
Can they thread that needle? They can try. We will see.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NVA got 2 age groups only but NVA still want to be considered for next year, they need to know what to do with Girls ECNL side.
Its a matter of time they go MLS next.
NVA was given full slate, not 2. But declined.
Anonymous wrote:NVA got 2 age groups only but NVA still want to be considered for next year, they need to know what to do with Girls ECNL side.
Its a matter of time they go MLS next.