Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

In Euphoria I thought her bug eyes were distracting. But I don’t want to watch a show where everyone is flawless and completely made up like soap operas.
I think a variety of looks and people make it more realistic.

I feel like she’s all over the place. In a couple shows I watch, posted about on Reddit and sm often, pictures at all the award shows and big red carpet events.

She does have amazing boobs and while I can’t help but look that’s kind of all I think about when I think about her. For sure what she’s famous for.

She is thoroughly mid and not that good looking at all.

Am man.

https://youtu.be/a9ZhleGV4Qc?si=AzpPBX4bJjzXwlvx

Was just on hot ones (hot wings eating interview show) a few days ago

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

You must not get out much

You must be insecure about your sad, deflated, tits.

Lol no, I just see quite a few nice pairs. Her's is definitely not the MOST spectacular.

I double down, if you think that, you must not get out much.

The problem with these kinds of boobs is that they will sag down to your knees by age 30 and they generally make people look heavier.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

This is an extremely random comparison. Radner was a comedian first, an actor second. She never relied on her looks.

Saw her new trailer earlier, different than what she’s been doing recently.

https://youtu.be/ewxS9Z-XXYo?si=LIe1KV1Q4_16bpqx

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

You must not get out much

You must be insecure about your sad, deflated, tits.

Lol no, I just see quite a few nice pairs. Her's is definitely not the MOST spectacular.

I double down, if you think that, you must not get out much.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Yeah. Roseanne Roseannadanna is wayyyyyyy hotter than Sydney Sweeney.

This site never ceases to amuse me.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I didn’t say Roseanne. You did. There is a different standard for women comics than actresses. All actresses have to do is learn lines and act them. Comics have to write those lines. It’s a totally different skill set. Male comics are not good looking, why do you expect the female ones to be? That being said, Gilda was pretty and had a great figure. Goggle her bikini shots, you won’t be disappointed. Sydney Sweeney just doesn’t have an it factor, sorry those boobs mean nothing to half the population.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

Yeah. Roseanne Roseannadanna is wayyyyyyy hotter than Sydney Sweeney.

This site never ceases to amuse me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

You must not get out much

You must be insecure about your sad, deflated, tits.

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

You must not get out much

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?