Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many thanks for your responses! To clarify, “cognitive minutes” are basically resource room minutes for reading and math support.
The girl’s parents are not in a position to get her private services outside school and are not savvy about the system and advocating for their daughter. I feel like she is being “swept under the rug” because she is not a behavior problem.
I will attempt again to push for more service minutes. After seeing what some other kids get, she is not getting enough resource room time or speech services. I am going to frame it as what does she need now to learn now because she is not making progress with the current level of support!
Didn't school start last week? How are you determining what progress she is making already? Did she get ESY? You'd be amazed by the change that can occur over the summer. When is her annual review and what program was she in before grade K?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s more context about how a GDD becomes an ID diagnosis if the child hasn’t caught up by 5:
https://www.theravive.com/therapedia/global-developmental-delay-dsm%C2%AD--5-315.8-(f88)
Again, this is from a medical context. It could be that the schools approach it differently!
You’re thinking it’s some kind of concrete thing based on the diagnosis but the reality is that they’re telling you it looks like your child has an ID. Many kids with autism are delayed in more than two areas - speech, motor, social - so GDD - yet have high IQ and are not obviously ID. ID refers to IQ. Delays =\ ID.
All I’m saying is that GDD, according to the medical literature, is a diagnosis for kids under the age of 5. If they haven’t caught up by then, the diagnosis changes to ID. This is not a rubric that is specific to my child. It is the general framework for the diagnoses.
This absolutely does not apply to schools. You may be referring to something that is true of the medical model, but ID requires a certain IQ in addition to poor adaptive skills. That's the definition. All other educational codes are an option when the child ages out of the DD code.
It doesn’t work that way. Getting an ID diagnosis is a big deal and it requires extensive testing and evaluation.
Anonymous wrote:Many thanks for your responses! To clarify, “cognitive minutes” are basically resource room minutes for reading and math support.
The girl’s parents are not in a position to get her private services outside school and are not savvy about the system and advocating for their daughter. I feel like she is being “swept under the rug” because she is not a behavior problem.
I will attempt again to push for more service minutes. After seeing what some other kids get, she is not getting enough resource room time or speech services. I am going to frame it as what does she need now to learn now because she is not making progress with the current level of support!
Anonymous wrote:Kindergarten teacher here. I have a student this year who came in with an IEP from preschool under the category of developmental delay. She receives services in speech/language for expressive and receptive delays and cognitive services, with goals like identifying the letters in her name and counting to 10. Her speech goals are using the pronoun I, identifying nouns and verbs, and answering who and what questions.
This child is on track to meet her speech goals by her IEP meeting next month but has made no progress at all toward her academic/cognitive goals. The service providers do not seem concerned with the lack of progress and actually said that due to her delays the goals may be too challenging and she needs easier ones in her new IEP, and that we should not worry if she doesn’t appear to be learning much with the current level of support because she is at a three-year-old level developmentally.
I did try to advocate for more service minutes (she is only pulled out 30 min 3x a month for speech and 60 minutes weekly for cognitive).
I brought up that I am concerned about her being in school every day just watching other kids learn. I was told that she may catch up in the future because some kids with developmental delays do (although I haven’t seen this happen in all my years teaching kindergarten), but we shouldn’t sweat her lack of progress because she isn’t ready from a developmental standpoint. I also don’t see how not providing more intensive services or a more restrictive placement is going to help her catch up.
Does anyone have a similar child? I guess I am looking for insight on what to do differently or how to advocate for her. I have 25 students, several with other special needs and behavioral issues, so it is difficult for me to figure out how to work with her more in the gen ed classroom.
Thank you so much!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How much time does she work with the special ed teacher? In what size groups? Does the special ed teacher have access to high quality, multisensory curricula?
Me again. I just saw that she gets 60 minutes a week of cognitive therapy -- does that refer to specialized instruction with the special ed teacher? She needs much more than that -- probably 120 minutes a day, to start.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s more context about how a GDD becomes an ID diagnosis if the child hasn’t caught up by 5:
https://www.theravive.com/therapedia/global-developmental-delay-dsm%C2%AD--5-315.8-(f88)
Again, this is from a medical context. It could be that the schools approach it differently!
You’re thinking it’s some kind of concrete thing based on the diagnosis but the reality is that they’re telling you it looks like your child has an ID. Many kids with autism are delayed in more than two areas - speech, motor, social - so GDD - yet have high IQ and are not obviously ID. ID refers to IQ. Delays =\ ID.
All I’m saying is that GDD, according to the medical literature, is a diagnosis for kids under the age of 5. If they haven’t caught up by then, the diagnosis changes to ID. This is not a rubric that is specific to my child. It is the general framework for the diagnoses.
It is nowhere near as black and white as this, or the GDD term would almost never be used. Medicine is not like law. Plenty of kids don’t catch up at 5 or ever but are not intellectually disabled. To be intellectually disabled you need an IQ of less than 70 and low adaptive skills. Getting such a diagnosis is an involved process. Nobody simply goes from being labeled as GDD to ID automatically when they turn 5.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s more context about how a GDD becomes an ID diagnosis if the child hasn’t caught up by 5:
https://www.theravive.com/therapedia/global-developmental-delay-dsm%C2%AD--5-315.8-(f88)
Again, this is from a medical context. It could be that the schools approach it differently!
You’re thinking it’s some kind of concrete thing based on the diagnosis but the reality is that they’re telling you it looks like your child has an ID. Many kids with autism are delayed in more than two areas - speech, motor, social - so GDD - yet have high IQ and are not obviously ID. ID refers to IQ. Delays =\ ID.
All I’m saying is that GDD, according to the medical literature, is a diagnosis for kids under the age of 5. If they haven’t caught up by then, the diagnosis changes to ID. This is not a rubric that is specific to my child. It is the general framework for the diagnoses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s more context about how a GDD becomes an ID diagnosis if the child hasn’t caught up by 5:
https://www.theravive.com/therapedia/global-developmental-delay-dsm%C2%AD--5-315.8-(f88)
Again, this is from a medical context. It could be that the schools approach it differently!
You’re thinking it’s some kind of concrete thing based on the diagnosis but the reality is that they’re telling you it looks like your child has an ID. Many kids with autism are delayed in more than two areas - speech, motor, social - so GDD - yet have high IQ and are not obviously ID. ID refers to IQ. Delays =\ ID.
All I’m saying is that GDD, according to the medical literature, is a diagnosis for kids under the age of 5. If they haven’t caught up by then, the diagnosis changes to ID. This is not a rubric that is specific to my child. It is the general framework for the diagnoses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s more context about how a GDD becomes an ID diagnosis if the child hasn’t caught up by 5:
https://www.theravive.com/therapedia/global-developmental-delay-dsm%C2%AD--5-315.8-(f88)
Again, this is from a medical context. It could be that the schools approach it differently!
You’re thinking it’s some kind of concrete thing based on the diagnosis but the reality is that they’re telling you it looks like your child has an ID. Many kids with autism are delayed in more than two areas - speech, motor, social - so GDD - yet have high IQ and are not obviously ID. ID refers to IQ. Delays =\ ID.
All I’m saying is that GDD, according to the medical literature, is a diagnosis for kids under the age of 5. If they haven’t caught up by then, the diagnosis changes to ID. This is not a rubric that is specific to my child. It is the general framework for the diagnoses.
Anonymous wrote:Here’s more context about how a GDD becomes an ID diagnosis if the child hasn’t caught up by 5:
https://www.theravive.com/therapedia/global-developmental-delay-dsm%C2%AD--5-315.8-(f88)
Again, this is from a medical context. It could be that the schools approach it differently!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s more context about how a GDD becomes an ID diagnosis if the child hasn’t caught up by 5:
https://www.theravive.com/therapedia/global-developmental-delay-dsm%C2%AD--5-315.8-(f88)
Again, this is from a medical context. It could be that the schools approach it differently!
You’re thinking it’s some kind of concrete thing based on the diagnosis but the reality is that they’re telling you it looks like your child has an ID. Many kids with autism are delayed in more than two areas - speech, motor, social - so GDD - yet have high IQ and are not obviously ID. ID refers to IQ. Delays =\ ID.
Anonymous wrote:Here’s more context about how a GDD becomes an ID diagnosis if the child hasn’t caught up by 5:
https://www.theravive.com/therapedia/global-developmental-delay-dsm%C2%AD--5-315.8-(f88)
Again, this is from a medical context. It could be that the schools approach it differently!