Anonymous wrote:Apparently she and her husband became 'enraged' due to another request from a passenger on a plane to turn off a sound machine they use to put their baby to sleep:
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/kaley-cuoco-angry-passengers-request-232822247.html
What is with the entitled dimwits we have as parents these days that think they can do whatever they want on a plane and subject everyone around them to perhaps hours of noise from their machine? How stupid can you be?
Maybe they should have rented a car and drove of they couldn't control their infant from crying and need a noise machine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How awkward is it going to be as their kid later in life when she Googles and finds out that for years her mom didn't even want kids. Like, actively talked about not wanting kids in many interviews.
Same with Zooey Deschanel.
I've read a lot of men also say they didn't want kids and then had them...George Clooney and Simon Cowell come to mind. Would you say that to them? There is no shame in not wanting kids and then changing your mind. If I were the kid I wouldn't feel any less love unless the parent said I wish I didn't have you!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't believe she's so rich without any talent or looks. I mean, that might go for most of Hollywood but she stands out. So its too bad she had such a nasty personality too
I think she's pretty. It's that Jennifer Aniston kind of pretty -- cute but in an approachable way that doesn't intimidate people. Sitcom pretty.
I also think that even though she's not like some super-talented method actor, she has a lot of skill as a TV actor in terms of timing, understanding comedic beats, and relating to scene partners as well as the camera. There are technical aspects of acting for the camera that I think most people are unaware of, and she really has them down. It's pretty much impossible to consistently work in TV as she has if you don't have those skills.
Some of her wealth is luck (huge luck in getting that role on Big Bang Theory and then that show hitting some kind of sweet spot with audiences and advertisers and running as long as it did -- every actor who lands a long running sitcom as their first major role lucked into it to some degree) but her success doesn't strike me as that surprising. She is similar to a lot of actors who have had that kind of success on TV. It's a very specific career trajectory and she fits the mold.
Anonymous wrote:Oh I can't STAND her, she's awful. She thinks she's god's gift when she's really a C-list actor at best. One supporting role on a mediocre TV show does not a superstar make.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apparently she and her husband became 'enraged' due to another request from a passenger on a plane to turn off a sound machine they use to put their baby to sleep:
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/kaley-cuoco-angry-passengers-request-232822247.html
What is with the entitled dimwits we have as parents these days that think they can do whatever they want on a plane and subject everyone around them to perhaps hours of noise from their machine? How stupid can you be?
Maybe they should have rented a car and drove of they couldn't control their infant from crying and need a noise machine.
The title of your thread should be Kaley Cuoco and her husband Tom Pelphrey since both were "enraged". Btw I agree that they were wrong but, why blame the woman only? Both were entitled
She’s the one who relayed the story and she is the one who was interviewed.
OP would not have mentioned a male celebrity complaining about this.