Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are debating contempt of congress for his failure to appear before them. And he's in the audience, ready to talk to them. Nancy Mace just asked him a question and he's not allowed to answer it.

You just can't make this stuff up!

He had his chance to speak before, but he decided to stage a circus outside.

Now he can face the consequences or continue to hide in the White House with daddy.

He is willing to testify in open committee. The GOP doesn't want that because they won't be able to lie about his testimony to the right wing echo chamber.

Why won't the GOP let him testify in open committee? There is no reason for it, and when asked by the left, no GOP member has been able to answer the question.

The GOP wants to hold a closed deposition first - just like the Democrats have done with J6 - in order to avoid the circus like we saw today. An open hearing does not allow for the follow up questions that a closed deposition allows. A closed hearing allows questioners to probe much more deeply than an open hearing allows. Closed deposition first, then open hearing.
And, as for your bolded accusation.....the transcripts are always made public so that pretty much ruins your argument.

Here’s Comer saying either a closed or open hearing is fine, though. Why so picky now?

Highlighted during the hearing.

I don't believe that refers to an official subpoena.

The “official subpoena” they actually sent is invalid so they need to start over.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/hunter-biden-comply-new-gop-subpoena-issued-lawyers-say-rcna133696

And even if their subpoena were legit, how can you be held in contempt or accused of being uncooperative when you show up in person and say you will answer their questions in public session?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are debating contempt of congress for his failure to appear before them. And he's in the audience, ready to talk to them. Nancy Mace just asked him a question and he's not allowed to answer it.

You just can't make this stuff up!

He had his chance to speak before, but he decided to stage a circus outside.

Now he can face the consequences or continue to hide in the White House with daddy.

He is willing to testify in open committee. The GOP doesn't want that because they won't be able to lie about his testimony to the right wing echo chamber.

Why won't the GOP let him testify in open committee? There is no reason for it, and when asked by the left, no GOP member has been able to answer the question.

The GOP wants to hold a closed deposition first - just like the Democrats have done with J6 - in order to avoid the circus like we saw today. An open hearing does not allow for the follow up questions that a closed deposition allows. A closed hearing allows questioners to probe much more deeply than an open hearing allows. Closed deposition first, then open hearing.
And, as for your bolded accusation.....the transcripts are always made public so that pretty much ruins your argument.

Here’s Comer saying either a closed or open hearing is fine, though. Why so picky now?

Highlighted during the hearing.

I don't believe that refers to an official subpoena.

The “official subpoena” they actually sent is invalid so they need to start over.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/hunter-biden-comply-new-gop-subpoena-issued-lawyers-say-rcna133696

Anonymous wrote:House Republicans hit pause on effort to hold Hunter Biden in contempt of Congress
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-republicans-hit-pause-effort-hold-hunter-biden-contempt-congress-rcna134226

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t he agree to a normal (not public) deposition now?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are debating contempt of congress for his failure to appear before them. And he's in the audience, ready to talk to them. Nancy Mace just asked him a question and he's not allowed to answer it.

You just can't make this stuff up!

He had his chance to speak before, but he decided to stage a circus outside.

Now he can face the consequences or continue to hide in the White House with daddy.

He is willing to testify in open committee. The GOP doesn't want that because they won't be able to lie about his testimony to the right wing echo chamber.

Why won't the GOP let him testify in open committee? There is no reason for it, and when asked by the left, no GOP member has been able to answer the question.

The GOP wants to hold a closed deposition first - just like the Democrats have done with J6 - in order to avoid the circus like we saw today. An open hearing does not allow for the follow up questions that a closed deposition allows. A closed hearing allows questioners to probe much more deeply than an open hearing allows. Closed deposition first, then open hearing.
And, as for your bolded accusation.....the transcripts are always made public so that pretty much ruins your argument.

Here’s Comer saying either a closed or open hearing is fine, though. Why so picky now?

Highlighted during the hearing.

I don't believe that refers to an official subpoena.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are debating contempt of congress for his failure to appear before them. And he's in the audience, ready to talk to them. Nancy Mace just asked him a question and he's not allowed to answer it.

You just can't make this stuff up!

He had his chance to speak before, but he decided to stage a circus outside.

Now he can face the consequences or continue to hide in the White House with daddy.

He is willing to testify in open committee. The GOP doesn't want that because they won't be able to lie about his testimony to the right wing echo chamber.

Why won't the GOP let him testify in open committee? There is no reason for it, and when asked by the left, no GOP member has been able to answer the question.

The GOP wants to hold a closed deposition first - just like the Democrats have done with J6 - in order to avoid the circus like we saw today. An open hearing does not allow for the follow up questions that a closed deposition allows. A closed hearing allows questioners to probe much more deeply than an open hearing allows. Closed deposition first, then open hearing.
And, as for your bolded accusation.....the transcripts are always made public so that pretty much ruins your argument.

Here’s Comer saying either a closed or open hearing is fine, though. Why so picky now?

Highlighted during the hearing.

I don't believe that refers to an official subpoena.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are debating contempt of congress for his failure to appear before them. And he's in the audience, ready to talk to them. Nancy Mace just asked him a question and he's not allowed to answer it.

You just can't make this stuff up!

He had his chance to speak before, but he decided to stage a circus outside.

Now he can face the consequences or continue to hide in the White House with daddy.

He is willing to testify in open committee. The GOP doesn't want that because they won't be able to lie about his testimony to the right wing echo chamber.

Why won't the GOP let him testify in open committee? There is no reason for it, and when asked by the left, no GOP member has been able to answer the question.

The GOP wants to hold a closed deposition first - just like the Democrats have done with J6 - in order to avoid the circus like we saw today. An open hearing does not allow for the follow up questions that a closed deposition allows. A closed hearing allows questioners to probe much more deeply than an open hearing allows. Closed deposition first, then open hearing.
And, as for your bolded accusation.....the transcripts are always made public so that pretty much ruins your argument.

Here’s Comer saying either a closed or open hearing is fine, though. Why so picky now?

Highlighted during the hearing.

I don't believe that refers to an official subpoena.

Anonymous wrote:The Republicans were absolutely eviscerated. It gets worse every time. You know they're going to have to put on an actual impeachment trial at some point. Given the weakness of their case, it's going to be historically embarrassing (and I don't think they'll have the numbers to impeach him because some members aren't going to attach their names to it for the historical record).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are debating contempt of congress for his failure to appear before them. And he's in the audience, ready to talk to them. Nancy Mace just asked him a question and he's not allowed to answer it.

You just can't make this stuff up!

He had his chance to speak before, but he decided to stage a circus outside.

Now he can face the consequences or continue to hide in the White House with daddy.

He is willing to testify in open committee. The GOP doesn't want that because they won't be able to lie about his testimony to the right wing echo chamber.

Why won't the GOP let him testify in open committee? There is no reason for it, and when asked by the left, no GOP member has been able to answer the question.

The GOP wants to hold a closed deposition first - just like the Democrats have done with J6 - in order to avoid the circus like we saw today. An open hearing does not allow for the follow up questions that a closed deposition allows. A closed hearing allows questioners to probe much more deeply than an open hearing allows. Closed deposition first, then open hearing.
And, as for your bolded accusation.....the transcripts are always made public so that pretty much ruins your argument.

Here’s Comer saying either a closed or open hearing is fine, though. Why so picky now?

Highlighted during the hearing.

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing we won’t hear much more from our DCUM Maga peanut gallery.

Their burnt 🔥

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dang I wish I could find the clip - one of the Dems at the hearing just offered to vote with the Rs to hold Hunter in contempt - if they amend the charge to include all the Rs who should be held in contempt for ignoring subpeonas! He listed out like 5 or 6 ignored subpeonas.

Here’s the clip - Biggs, Jordan, Perry, McCarthy and Meadows.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This all seems so familiar:

Never been one to hide her true feelings