Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:... at 23 and with a new boyfriend.
On the one hand, she's a young woman with more financial resources than most her age. So she can certainly afford to raise a kid.
On the other, what is she thinking professionally? Unless she's not really interested in being an actor? Seems like most young actors try to pile on numerous smart opportunities while they're finding some early fame, so this choice stands out.
Sophie Turner was 24
Reese Witherspoon was 22
Victoria Beckham was 24
Adele was 24
Megan Fox was 26
Hillary Duff was 24
All of these people still have careers.
Brandy was 25 and her career trajectory was very similar to Halle's.
Started as a teen singer, then landed multiple high profile acting roles, while mainly her music career.
The bottom line is, Halle Bailey is extremely talented and hard working and that will take her far.
Anonymous wrote:This makes more sense to me than celebrities who have babies in the 50s. When you are a child actresses you are already more mature than most. You also have more income than most 24 year olds (isn’t this why ppl keep saying they can’t have kids) so you have the resources. Plus- you have the energy to still keep up with your career. I’ve never understood people like Cameron Diaz that wait until 50- it makes no sense
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:does anyone actually have a perfect love story, though?
I mean, my husband and I have been married over 20 years now. It isn't perfect, but most people wouldn't know that. We came very close to divorce just about 10 years ago-only a couple people know this.
I think most of us wouldn't be thrilled with our daughters getting pregnant at 23 with only a boyfriend. The odds are not good that they will get married, stay married, and she will likely end up a single parent. Does anyone wish and hope their daughter will end up a single mom at 24?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:... at 23 and with a new boyfriend.
On the one hand, she's a young woman with more financial resources than most her age. So she can certainly afford to raise a kid.
On the other, what is she thinking professionally? Unless she's not really interested in being an actor? Seems like most young actors try to pile on numerous smart opportunities while they're finding some early fame, so this choice stands out.
Sophie Turner was 24
Reese Witherspoon was 22
Victoria Beckham was 24
Adele was 24
Megan Fox was 26
Hillary Duff was 24
All of these people still have careers.
Brandy was 25 and her career trajectory was very similar to Halle's.
Started as a teen singer, then landed multiple high profile acting roles, while mainly her music career.
The bottom line is, Halle Bailey is extremely talented and hard working and that will take her far.
Anonymous wrote:does anyone actually have a perfect love story, though?
I mean, my husband and I have been married over 20 years now. It isn't perfect, but most people wouldn't know that. We came very close to divorce just about 10 years ago-only a couple people know this.
Anonymous wrote:does anyone actually have a perfect love story, though?
I mean, my husband and I have been married over 20 years now. It isn't perfect, but most people wouldn't know that. We came very close to divorce just about 10 years ago-only a couple people know this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:... at 23 and with a new boyfriend.
On the one hand, she's a young woman with more financial resources than most her age. So she can certainly afford to raise a kid.
On the other, what is she thinking professionally? Unless she's not really interested in being an actor? Seems like most young actors try to pile on numerous smart opportunities while they're finding some early fame, so this choice stands out.
Sophie Turner was 24
Reese Witherspoon was 22
Victoria Beckham was 24
Adele was 24
Megan Fox was 26
Hillary Duff was 24
All of these people still have careers.
…..and failed relationships with the first baby daddy. Not coincidence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:... at 23 and with a new boyfriend.
On the one hand, she's a young woman with more financial resources than most her age. So she can certainly afford to raise a kid.
On the other, what is she thinking professionally? Unless she's not really interested in being an actor? Seems like most young actors try to pile on numerous smart opportunities while they're finding some early fame, so this choice stands out.
Sophie Turner was 24
Reese Witherspoon was 22
Victoria Beckham was 24
Adele was 24
Megan Fox was 26
Hillary Duff was 24
All of these people still have careers.
…..and failed relationships with the first baby daddy. Not coincidence.
not Beckham
Anonymous wrote:Preachers daughter. She’s finally got freedom. Tale as old as time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:... at 23 and with a new boyfriend.
On the one hand, she's a young woman with more financial resources than most her age. So she can certainly afford to raise a kid.
On the other, what is she thinking professionally? Unless she's not really interested in being an actor? Seems like most young actors try to pile on numerous smart opportunities while they're finding some early fame, so this choice stands out.
Sophie Turner was 24
Reese Witherspoon was 22
Victoria Beckham was 24
Adele was 24
Megan Fox was 26
Hillary Duff was 24
All of these people still have careers.
…..and failed relationships with the first baby daddy. Not coincidence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:... at 23 and with a new boyfriend.
On the one hand, she's a young woman with more financial resources than most her age. So she can certainly afford to raise a kid.
On the other, what is she thinking professionally? Unless she's not really interested in being an actor? Seems like most young actors try to pile on numerous smart opportunities while they're finding some early fame, so this choice stands out.
Sophie Turner was 24
Reese Witherspoon was 22
Victoria Beckham was 24
Adele was 24
Megan Fox was 26
Hillary Duff was 24
All of these people still have careers.