Anonymous wrote:It’s highly likely that - without massive improvement- this kid will be ranked more than 1000 in 1.5 years.
Anonymous wrote:College athletes are statistically significantly (but not incredibly) wealthier than non-atheletes, especially in VA and especially lacrosse players. And, to OP, half of tennis players are international students.
https://flathatnews.com/2021/09/19/do-student-athletes-come-from-more-privileged-backgrounds-athletes-have-higher-hometown-median-household-income-many-families-spend-thousands-on-club-sports/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I knew a u Chicago swim recruit who was ranked.
He was also full pay from an affluent family in one of the most affluent areas in the country. For u Chicago, swimming rank was just an excuse to let in a full pay student.
Do you know how silly a statement this is?
Swimmers are recruited exclusively on their times. He had the times necessary and the stats required, so he was admitted.
You think the swim coach who used a tip for him cares about his need for aid?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I knew a u Chicago swim recruit who was ranked.
He was also full pay from an affluent family in one of the most affluent areas in the country. For u Chicago, swimming rank was just an excuse to let in a full pay student.
Do you know how silly a statement this is?
Swimmers are recruited exclusively on their times. He had the times necessary and the stats required, so he was admitted.
You think the swim coach who used a tip for him cares about his need for aid?
Agree. University of Chicago is need-blind. The school would have found financial aid for him if he'd needed it. I know a tennis player who got into a very good LAC with academic stats that were well below the 25th percentile and whose family could not have afforded to send them to a public university. They got a full ride (yes, of course D3 schools don't offer athletic scholarships, wink, wink).
Anonymous wrote:"Top 600"? So 600? That wont help them at all. That's extremely low on the tennis roster for the US.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I knew a u Chicago swim recruit who was ranked.
He was also full pay from an affluent family in one of the most affluent areas in the country. For u Chicago, swimming rank was just an excuse to let in a full pay student.
Do you know how silly a statement this is?
Swimmers are recruited exclusively on their times. He had the times necessary and the stats required, so he was admitted.
You think the swim coach who used a tip for him cares about his need for aid?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For what is worth, I know of a tennis player with SAT score above 1500, top academics with highest rigor, ranked around 100 in the nation with coach's support but was still rejected by MIT. This is recent.
Did the person apply early decision? For D3, it's best to apply ED1/2 if you are being recruited. We were told by D3 tennis coaches that our daughter needed to apply early decision or the coach would not be able to influence the admissions process. They said that if she went regular decision, she would enter the general pool of applicants and her recruitment status would no longer be a pull. They did a "pre-read" (meaning they looked at her stats) and told her she was guaranteed admission if she applied ED. I'm not sure they were supposed to say that out loud. There are NCAA rules around D3 recruiting that are not always followed very precisely. For example, D3 schools aren't allowed to give full athletic scholarships, but then they sometimes offer recruited athletes tons of financial aid.
Basically, my kid was told: ED1 or ED2 and you're in automatically; go regular decision and your tennis status will not factor into the admission process, other than being considered a nice extra-curricular.
She got into her dream school ED1, and it made her senior year so pleasant to get the college application stuff out of the way early and without stress.
MIT doesn't have ED, and I don't think they have pre-reads, slots, or guarantees. She applied EA as an athletic recruit. From what I hear MIT and Caltech does not lower the standards for athletes one bit. She definitely had the qualification to do the work at MIT academically. The only thing I can think of why she got rejected was because MIT was not a perfect fit. Her ECs were mostly in business, but no STEM ECs and MIT is really a stem school. Maybe, her essasy were lacking, I don't know.
My DD went through the D3 recruiting circuit this past year, got interest from mid to lower NESCAC schools, and other excellent academic D3s. Ultimately, she chose to apply to an Ivy league school ED, which accepted her and she plans on playing club tennis next Fall.
Anonymous wrote:"Top 600"? So 600? That wont help them at all. That's extremely low on the tennis roster for the US.
Anonymous wrote:I knew a u Chicago swim recruit who was ranked.
He was also full pay from an affluent family in one of the most affluent areas in the country. For u Chicago, swimming rank was just an excuse to let in a full pay student.