Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is darker than Cristiano Ronaldo?
DP. Yes.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is darker than Cristiano Ronaldo?
Yes!!! She is much darker. It’s in the undertones. Her undertones are not found in Europeans. Cristiano is super tan, in addition to being a dark skinned CAUCASIAN, but his ruddy undertone is frequently found in Europeans, especially Mediterranean ones. Kamala’s skin tone is not found in Caucasians.
I don’t mean to be mean or touch upon a sensitive topic. But are you Indian? I’ve found that Indians are obsessed with skin tone, but are simultaneously totally blind to the differences between Mediterranean skin tones and South Asian/Persian ones. I’ve encountered quite a few Indians who think Italians or Spaniards or Greeks, or in this case, Portuguese people, look like they can be Indian and are even darker than some Indians. But they are literally the only ones who think that. I, for one, have never confused a Spaniard with a Punjabi or an Italian for a Bengali. They look totally different. Indians, even the very, very light skinned ones are browner in their skin tones. Kamala is much browner than Ronaldo. I don’t know how you cannot see that.
Not to mention her lifelong experience with oppression and male-domination in the US.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is darker than Cristiano Ronaldo?
Yes!!! She is much darker. It’s in the undertones. Her undertones are not found in Europeans. Cristiano is super tan, in addition to being a dark skinned CAUCASIAN, but his ruddy undertone is frequently found in Europeans, especially Mediterranean ones. Kamala’s skin tone is not found in Caucasians.
I don’t mean to be mean or touch upon a sensitive topic. But are you Indian? I’ve found that Indians are obsessed with skin tone, but are simultaneously totally blind to the differences between Mediterranean skin tones and South Asian/Persian ones. I’ve encountered quite a few Indians who think Italians or Spaniards or Greeks, or in this case, Portuguese people, look like they can be Indian and are even darker than some Indians. But they are literally the only ones who think that. I, for one, have never confused a Spaniard with a Punjabi or an Italian for a Bengali. They look totally different. Indians, even the very, very light skinned ones are browner in their skin tones. Kamala is much browner than Ronaldo. I don’t know how you cannot see that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is one of the craziest threads I’ve seen here. Europeans—including Spanish, Portuguese, and Italians—are all considered white in 2023. This despite their often very dark skin and hair. This despite certain groups (especially Italians) being considered non-white as immigrants in the US a century or so ago. Oppression seems to matter in whether groups are considered POC. So middle eastern Muslims, long thought of as white, are increasingly being considered POC. Italians, with dark hair and dark skin (you should see my cousins!), are white.
So you admit Italians are dark-skinned but their dark skin does not qualify as "person of color" because they are not oppressed enough?
If so, then why have the term POC if it doesn't mean what it refers to?
Anonymous wrote:She is darker than Cristiano Ronaldo?
Anonymous wrote:She is darker than Cristiano Ronaldo?
Anonymous wrote:This is one of the craziest threads I’ve seen here. Europeans—including Spanish, Portuguese, and Italians—are all considered white in 2023. This despite their often very dark skin and hair. This despite certain groups (especially Italians) being considered non-white as immigrants in the US a century or so ago. Oppression seems to matter in whether groups are considered POC. So middle eastern Muslims, long thought of as white, are increasingly being considered POC. Italians, with dark hair and dark skin (you should see my cousins!), are white.
Anonymous wrote:This is one of the craziest threads I’ve seen here. Europeans—including Spanish, Portuguese, and Italians—are all considered white in 2023. This despite their often very dark skin and hair. This despite certain groups (especially Italians) being considered non-white as immigrants in the US a century or so ago. Oppression seems to matter in whether groups are considered POC. So middle eastern Muslims, long thought of as white, are increasingly being considered POC. Italians, with dark hair and dark skin (you should see my cousins!), are white.
Anonymous wrote:This is one of the craziest threads I’ve seen here. Europeans—including Spanish, Portuguese, and Italians—are all considered white in 2023. This despite their often very dark skin and hair. This despite certain groups (especially Italians) being considered non-white as immigrants in the US a century or so ago. Oppression seems to matter in whether groups are considered POC. So middle eastern Muslims, long thought of as white, are increasingly being considered POC. Italians, with dark hair and dark skin (you should see my cousins!), are white.
Race is a social construct.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:![]()
Cristiano Ronaldo, one of the greatest soccer players of all time, is Portuguese. He doesn't look white to me.
Really? He looks white to me!
He is darker than Kamala Harris, how in the world he is white?
Because Kamala is of African and North Indian descent and he is of European ancestry so whiter than kamala
Kamala is also a direct descendant of slave owners; not the case with Ronaldo as far as we know.
Wait - descendant of slave owners??!?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:![]()
Cristiano Ronaldo, one of the greatest soccer players of all time, is Portuguese. He doesn't look white to me.
Really? He looks white to me!
He is darker than Kamala Harris, how in the world he is white?
Anonymous wrote:to OP, please stop these threads. You've started a number of them "are Spaniards people of color" etc. just within the last two days. YOu are trying to create a problem for some personal reason you have