Anonymous wrote:People who drive SUVs are too fat and unfit to manage a normal car.
Anonymous wrote:They are heavy as hell. It's only a matter of time until they tax EVs by weight or something. They will have huge bills every year. They're terrible do the environment because of how much material they use and their gargantuan weight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you are saying they are very safe for the passengers and driver?
So you’re saying more nukes and more nuke proliferation makes everyone safer? How about everyone own guns too?
Your logic is asinine, because there are hundreds of millions of people all throughout the world in Europe or Japan that have families. No one there needs stupidly sized vehicles to haul around a family. And no, these vehicles aren’t even safer for their owners. They’re more prone to rollovers. These idiotic large SUVs are exempt from the same kind of safety testing as sedans. These dumb cars are more dangerous for everyone on the road, pedestrians in cities, and even for their owners.
https://www.autoweek.com/news/technology/a43299041/2023-passenger-suv-safety-ratings-from-iihs/
Enough of the stupidity already.
The rivian has the highest safety rating. Sounds like a total win.
Now see what it does to other cars when Rivian owners cause accidents.
If you don’t like that, wait until cybertrucks become common on the roads. I ordered two of them myself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you are saying they are very safe for the passengers and driver?
So you’re saying more nukes and more nuke proliferation makes everyone safer? How about everyone own guns too?
Your logic is asinine, because there are hundreds of millions of people all throughout the world in Europe or Japan that have families. No one there needs stupidly sized vehicles to haul around a family. And no, these vehicles aren’t even safer for their owners. They’re more prone to rollovers. These idiotic large SUVs are exempt from the same kind of safety testing as sedans. These dumb cars are more dangerous for everyone on the road, pedestrians in cities, and even for their owners.
https://www.autoweek.com/news/technology/a43299041/2023-passenger-suv-safety-ratings-from-iihs/
Enough of the stupidity already.
The rivian has the highest safety rating. Sounds like a total win.
Now see what it does to other cars when Rivian owners cause accidents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you are saying they are very safe for the passengers and driver?
So you’re saying more nukes and more nuke proliferation makes everyone safer? How about everyone own guns too?
Your logic is asinine, because there are hundreds of millions of people all throughout the world in Europe or Japan that have families. No one there needs stupidly sized vehicles to haul around a family. And no, these vehicles aren’t even safer for their owners. They’re more prone to rollovers. These idiotic large SUVs are exempt from the same kind of safety testing as sedans. These dumb cars are more dangerous for everyone on the road, pedestrians in cities, and even for their owners.
https://www.autoweek.com/news/technology/a43299041/2023-passenger-suv-safety-ratings-from-iihs/
Enough of the stupidity already.
The rivian has the highest safety rating. Sounds like a total win.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you are saying they are very safe for the passengers and driver?
So you’re saying more nukes and more nuke proliferation makes everyone safer? How about everyone own guns too?
Your logic is asinine, because there are hundreds of millions of people all throughout the world in Europe or Japan that have families. No one there needs stupidly sized vehicles to haul around a family. And no, these vehicles aren’t even safer for their owners. They’re more prone to rollovers. These idiotic large SUVs are exempt from the same kind of safety testing as sedans. These dumb cars are more dangerous for everyone on the road, pedestrians in cities, and even for their owners.
https://www.autoweek.com/news/technology/a43299041/2023-passenger-suv-safety-ratings-from-iihs/
Enough of the stupidity already.
Anonymous wrote:So you are saying they are very safe for the passengers and driver?
Anonymous wrote:This crazy poster makes me want to go buy 5 rivians.
Calm down. You’ll encourage more people to consider your point of view if you stop calling them idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread seems like one troll that just hates Rivians/EVs and wants everyone to drive tiny cars and bicycles.
Hey moron, do some basic math. You are probably a lawyer, a business degree major, or some other flimsy liberal arts degree major who must at math.
Imagine an 8500+ lbs Rivian accidentally running a stop sign at 25 mph and hitting a small kid crossing the street. Now compare that same incident to someone driving a 3250 lbs Honda Accord. The Rivian has a gargantuan 2.61x more mass than the Honda Accord.
Let me spell it out for you in simple terms: to transfer the same amount of momentum into a child as the Rivian going 25 mph, the Honda Accord would have to be traveling at 65+ mph in the neighborhood!
How many people would be outraged at a car traveling 65 mph through their neighborhood streets where their kids play? Quite ironic that's outrageous yet the Honda Accord going 65 mph in a neighborhood has the same momentum as a fat Rivian going only 25 mph.
These cars are ridiculously sized and an extreme danger. The worst part is they Rivian owners pay $0 in taxes to maintain our roads yet they do the most damage to them per driver becise of their extreme mass. At least with stupidly sized ICE SUVs They require more gas so end up getting taxed more. They contribute proportionally to the amount of damage they inflict on roads. Rivian owners are freeloading deadbeats, and they're dangerous for everyone else around them.
Seems like you have an issue with any large car. Or trucks! Did you know there are these things called semi trucks that carry things across the country? Things you may be using right now! Or UPS trucks! They probably brought you books to teach you math!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread seems like one troll that just hates Rivians/EVs and wants everyone to drive tiny cars and bicycles.
Hey moron, do some basic math. You are probably a lawyer, a business degree major, or some other flimsy liberal arts degree major who must at math.
Imagine an 8500+ lbs Rivian accidentally running a stop sign at 25 mph and hitting a small kid crossing the street. Now compare that same incident to someone driving a 3250 lbs Honda Accord. The Rivian has a gargantuan 2.61x more mass than the Honda Accord.
Let me spell it out for you in simple terms: to transfer the same amount of momentum into a child as the Rivian going 25 mph, the Honda Accord would have to be traveling at 65+ mph in the neighborhood!
How many people would be outraged at a car traveling 65 mph through their neighborhood streets where their kids play? Quite ironic that's outrageous yet the Honda Accord going 65 mph in a neighborhood has the same momentum as a fat Rivian going only 25 mph.
These cars are ridiculously sized and an extreme danger. The worst part is they Rivian owners pay $0 in taxes to maintain our roads yet they do the most damage to them per driver becise of their extreme mass. At least with stupidly sized ICE SUVs They require more gas so end up getting taxed more. They contribute proportionally to the amount of damage they inflict on roads. Rivian owners are freeloading deadbeats, and they're dangerous for everyone else around them.
Well this unhinged rant is all over the place. They’re too big! But so are regular SUVs! Just tax them more! Think of the children! Think of the pavement! But still they are freeloaders that will kill everything around them!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread seems like one troll that just hates Rivians/EVs and wants everyone to drive tiny cars and bicycles.
Hey moron, do some basic math. You are probably a lawyer, a business degree major, or some other flimsy liberal arts degree major who must at math.
Imagine an 8500+ lbs Rivian accidentally running a stop sign at 25 mph and hitting a small kid crossing the street. Now compare that same incident to someone driving a 3250 lbs Honda Accord. The Rivian has a gargantuan 2.61x more mass than the Honda Accord.
Let me spell it out for you in simple terms: to transfer the same amount of momentum into a child as the Rivian going 25 mph, the Honda Accord would have to be traveling at 65+ mph in the neighborhood!
How many people would be outraged at a car traveling 65 mph through their neighborhood streets where their kids play? Quite ironic that's outrageous yet the Honda Accord going 65 mph in a neighborhood has the same momentum as a fat Rivian going only 25 mph.
These cars are ridiculously sized and an extreme danger. The worst part is they Rivian owners pay $0 in taxes to maintain our roads yet they do the most damage to them per driver becise of their extreme mass. At least with stupidly sized ICE SUVs They require more gas so end up getting taxed more. They contribute proportionally to the amount of damage they inflict on roads. Rivian owners are freeloading deadbeats, and they're dangerous for everyone else around them.
Depends. Which state are you in?