Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Would Happen If A white Mayor Held A Party For Only white Elected Officials?

Interesting question. Here are some possibilities:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/what-would-happen-if-a-white-mayor-held-a-party-for-only-white-elected-officials

It would be easily defended using the same standard Boston POC "electeds" used:

“It is not at all divisive, it is creating spaces for people and communities and identities with shared experiences to come together,” said Ruthzee Louijeune, a Boston city councilor at-large. “We are still breaking barriers and it is so important for us to carve out and create that space.”


Ruthzee: do you employ dishonest double standards, or not?

One mishap by some idiot in Boston isn't comparable to the thousands of years of abuse minorities throughout the world have experienced at the hands of their oppressors.

Isn't she Han Chinese?

What does that matter? She is an idiot that made a mistake. Move on. There are bigger problems in the world than one silly mayor's inappropriate party and her stupid assistant that can't determine how to delete recipients of an all staff email before sending it. They aren't evil, racist people. They just aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brown skinned Latina here and excluding people based on their race or skin color is just not Ok in my book.

If you haven't noticed, Latinos don't have a say about anything.

"Progressives" - mostly well to do younger white women and the emasculated men that want to sleep with them - and black social justice warriors, control the dialogue. Latinos are a distraction. Not quite black enough. Not gender fluid enough. Too conservative.

For progressives, most Latinos are the enemy.

Excluding people for their skin color or heritage is the core of progressive thinking. And Latinos are right up there as the bad people.

You people sure are quick to categorize people based on things people shouldn't be categorized by.

You mean like progressives insist we do?

Who cares what a "progressive" insist you do? You do you and if what you're doing is categorizing people by skin color, I'm gonna call you out as the ignorant cancer you are.

I agree with you 100%. Unfortunately I live is a super progressive area controlled by leftist lunatics. They are teaching CRT in schools and base a lot of the county's decisions on race. So I have to pay attention to this stuff.

CRT isn't a thing. No one teaches it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brown skinned Latina here and excluding people based on their race or skin color is just not Ok in my book.

If you haven't noticed, Latinos don't have a say about anything.

"Progressives" - mostly well to do younger white women and the emasculated men that want to sleep with them - and black social justice warriors, control the dialogue. Latinos are a distraction. Not quite black enough. Not gender fluid enough. Too conservative.

For progressives, most Latinos are the enemy.

Excluding people for their skin color or heritage is the core of progressive thinking. And Latinos are right up there as the bad people.

You people sure are quick to categorize people based on things people shouldn't be categorized by.

You mean like progressives insist we do?

Who cares what a "progressive" insist you do? You do you and if what you're doing is categorizing people by skin color, I'm gonna call you out as the ignorant cancer you are.

I agree with you 100%. Unfortunately I live is a super progressive area controlled by leftist lunatics. They are teaching CRT in schools and base a lot of the county's decisions on race. So I have to pay attention to this stuff.

Anonymous wrote:What was the cutoff to make the list? How Black did you need to be?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Would Happen If A white Mayor Held A Party For Only white Elected Officials?

Interesting question. Here are some possibilities:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/what-would-happen-if-a-white-mayor-held-a-party-for-only-white-elected-officials

It would be easily defended using the same standard Boston POC "electeds" used:

“It is not at all divisive, it is creating spaces for people and communities and identities with shared experiences to come together,” said Ruthzee Louijeune, a Boston city councilor at-large. “We are still breaking barriers and it is so important for us to carve out and create that space.”


Ruthzee: do you employ dishonest double standards, or not?

One mishap by some idiot in Boston isn't comparable to the thousands of years of abuse minorities throughout the world have experienced at the hands of their oppressors.

Isn't she Han Chinese?

What does that matter? She is an idiot that made a mistake. Move on. There are bigger problems in the world than one silly mayor's inappropriate party and her stupid assistant that can't determine how to delete recipients of an all staff email before sending it. They aren't evil, racist people. They just aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.

Excluding an entire group, based solely on the color of their skin, is not racist?

Oh please dear enlightened one, do explain this to us simpletons.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brown skinned Latina here and excluding people based on their race or skin color is just not Ok in my book.

If you haven't noticed, Latinos don't have a say about anything.

"Progressives" - mostly well to do younger white women and the emasculated men that want to sleep with them - and black social justice warriors, control the dialogue. Latinos are a distraction. Not quite black enough. Not gender fluid enough. Too conservative.

For progressives, most Latinos are the enemy.

Excluding people for their skin color or heritage is the core of progressive thinking. And Latinos are right up there as the bad people.

You people sure are quick to categorize people based on things people shouldn't be categorized by.

You mean like progressives insist we do?

Who cares what a "progressive" insist you do? You do you and if what you're doing is categorizing people by skin color, I'm gonna call you out as the ignorant cancer you are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Would Happen If A white Mayor Held A Party For Only white Elected Officials?

Interesting question. Here are some possibilities:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/what-would-happen-if-a-white-mayor-held-a-party-for-only-white-elected-officials

It would be easily defended using the same standard Boston POC "electeds" used:

“It is not at all divisive, it is creating spaces for people and communities and identities with shared experiences to come together,” said Ruthzee Louijeune, a Boston city councilor at-large. “We are still breaking barriers and it is so important for us to carve out and create that space.”


Ruthzee: do you employ dishonest double standards, or not?

One mishap by some idiot in Boston isn't comparable to the thousands of years of abuse minorities throughout the world have experienced at the hands of their oppressors.

Isn't she Han Chinese?

What does that matter? She is an idiot that made a mistake. Move on. There are bigger problems in the world than one silly mayor's inappropriate party and her stupid assistant that can't determine how to delete recipients of an all staff email before sending it. They aren't evil, racist people. They just aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brown skinned Latina here and excluding people based on their race or skin color is just not Ok in my book.

If you haven't noticed, Latinos don't have a say about anything.

"Progressives" - mostly well to do younger white women and the emasculated men that want to sleep with them - and black social justice warriors, control the dialogue. Latinos are a distraction. Not quite black enough. Not gender fluid enough. Too conservative.

For progressives, most Latinos are the enemy.

Excluding people for their skin color or heritage is the core of progressive thinking. And Latinos are right up there as the bad people.

You people sure are quick to categorize people based on things people shouldn't be categorized by.

You mean like progressives insist we do?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brown skinned Latina here and excluding people based on their race or skin color is just not Ok in my book.

If you haven't noticed, Latinos don't have a say about anything.

"Progressives" - mostly well to do younger white women and the emasculated men that want to sleep with them - and black social justice warriors, control the dialogue. Latinos are a distraction. Not quite black enough. Not gender fluid enough. Too conservative.

For progressives, most Latinos are the enemy.

Excluding people for their skin color or heritage is the core of progressive thinking. And Latinos are right up there as the bad people.

You people sure are quick to categorize people based on things people shouldn't be categorized by.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Would Happen If A white Mayor Held A Party For Only white Elected Officials?

Interesting question. Here are some possibilities:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/what-would-happen-if-a-white-mayor-held-a-party-for-only-white-elected-officials

It would be easily defended using the same standard Boston POC "electeds" used:

“It is not at all divisive, it is creating spaces for people and communities and identities with shared experiences to come together,” said Ruthzee Louijeune, a Boston city councilor at-large. “We are still breaking barriers and it is so important for us to carve out and create that space.”


Ruthzee: do you employ dishonest double standards, or not?

One mishap by some idiot in Boston isn't comparable to the thousands of years of abuse minorities throughout the world have experienced at the hands of their oppressors.

Isn't she Han Chinese?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brown skinned Latina here and excluding people based on their race or skin color is just not Ok in my book.

If you haven't noticed, Latinos don't have a say about anything.

"Progressives" - mostly well to do younger white women and the emasculated men that want to sleep with them - and black social justice warriors, control the dialogue. Latinos are a distraction. Not quite black enough. Not gender fluid enough. Too conservative.

For progressives, most Latinos are the enemy.

Excluding people for their skin color or heritage is the core of progressive thinking. And Latinos are right up there as the bad people.

Anonymous wrote:Brown skinned Latina here and excluding people based on their race or skin color is just not Ok in my book.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Would Happen If A white Mayor Held A Party For Only white Elected Officials?

Interesting question. Here are some possibilities:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/what-would-happen-if-a-white-mayor-held-a-party-for-only-white-elected-officials

It would be easily defended using the same standard Boston POC "electeds" used:

“It is not at all divisive, it is creating spaces for people and communities and identities with shared experiences to come together,” said Ruthzee Louijeune, a Boston city councilor at-large. “We are still breaking barriers and it is so important for us to carve out and create that space.”


Ruthzee: do you employ dishonest double standards, or not?

One mishap by some idiot in Boston isn't comparable to the thousands of years of abuse minorities throughout the world have experienced at the hands of their oppressors.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Would Happen If A white Mayor Held A Party For Only white Elected Officials?

Interesting question. Here are some possibilities:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/what-would-happen-if-a-white-mayor-held-a-party-for-only-white-elected-officials

It would be easily defended using the same standard Boston POC "electeds" used:

“It is not at all divisive, it is creating spaces for people and communities and identities with shared experiences to come together,” said Ruthzee Louijeune, a Boston city councilor at-large. “We are still breaking barriers and it is so important for us to carve out and create that space.”


Ruthzee: do you employ dishonest double standards, or not?