Anonymous wrote:At most colleges, small or large, athletes mostly eat together and socialize with each other. Do you think the Duke basketball team is mingling with the commoners?
Anonymous wrote:Didn't high school have a lot of athletes, people in plays, etc.? Don't know why college would be any different.
Time to grow up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of us are just trying to share the benefit of our experiences. Many many SLAC student newspapers write about this us vs them issue with athletes and NARP’s. Not a made up issue.
Amherst & Williams & Middlebury have written about NARP issues on campus. Trinity College has many reports regarding segmentation on campus due to various factors.
Bowdoin, Tufts, & Conn College do not seem to experience such issues.
I believe OP because I attended an LAC. Athletes socialized together & there were a lot of cliques. The problem was exacerbated by the LACs location in a rural, isolated area.
LACs are not real life--they are like living in a bubble. If you fit in, then the LAC experience can be wonderful, but many do not fit the mold. Much easier to find one's crowd at larger schools due to diversity & to greater number of students & activities.
This is actually a long-standing issue at Bowdoin. Agree about tufts.
https://bowdoinorient.com/2021/10/29/athletic-department-addresses-divide-between-athletes-and-non-athletes/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
LACs are not real life--they are like living in a bubble.
Virtually all residential colleges are not real life and like living in bubbles - public, private, large, small, urban, rural - at least as long as you live in university-owned and run housing and eat in the university dining halls. But that's really the only reason to make them residential. They are supposed to provide a bridge or transition from living at home to living on your own. Many schools have apartment-style junior/senior housing with kitchen facilities and reduced dining plan requirements to push students along in this transition to independence.
Suggesting that non-LACs are somehow not organized around this same principle ignores reality and indicates bias. Having a larger number of people in the bubble does not make it less bubble-like. Maybe a remote, rural, campus is less real in the sense of security issues or contact with people outside the campus, but there are plenty of remote, rural, non-LACs and even the urban campuses are literally set-up to minimize security issues, including having campus transportation services and campus police patrolling off campus, in a way that is not real life. And that's OK. That's part of the educational process you are signing your kid up for when you send them to a residential college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of us are just trying to share the benefit of our experiences. Many many SLAC student newspapers write about this us vs them issue with athletes and NARP’s. Not a made up issue.
Amherst & Williams & Middlebury have written about NARP issues on campus. Trinity College has many reports regarding segmentation on campus due to various factors.
Bowdoin, Tufts, & Conn College do not seem to experience such issues.
I believe OP because I attended an LAC. Athletes socialized together & there were a lot of cliques. The problem was exacerbated by the LACs location in a rural, isolated area.
LACs are not real life--they are like living in a bubble. If you fit in, then the LAC experience can be wonderful, but many do not fit the mold. Much easier to find one's crowd at larger schools due to diversity & to greater number of students & activities.
Anonymous wrote:
LACs are not real life--they are like living in a bubble.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Didn't high school have a lot of athletes, people in plays, etc.? Don't know why college would be any different.
Time to grow up.
(New Poster)
Time to grow up ? Please reread your post; you are making the point that LACs are just like redoing high school. I agree.
It's not re-doing high school. High school has groups doing the same things most colleges do regardless of size. If a kid cannot adapt socially, that's not the college's fault.
Someone 18-22 needs to learn how to interact with a college community. The social environment will not be tailor made for you.
Anonymous wrote:Some of us are just trying to share the benefit of our experiences. Many many SLAC student newspapers write about this us vs them issue with athletes and NARP’s. Not a made up issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of us are just trying to share the benefit of our experiences. Many many SLAC student newspapers write about this us vs them issue with athletes and NARP’s. Not a made up issue.
If you don’t actually name the school, it’s useless.
Haverford.
Hamilton.
Kenyon.
Bowdoin.