Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No parent has to pay for the wedding of their children.
+1
Also, I would think most competent adults would be embarrassed for their parents to pay for a wedding, especially if the couple getting married has full time jobs.
I really don’t get this whole strain of “it’s embarrassing to pass wealth from parent to child before death”.
The whole point of a dowry was to pass wealth at marriage but all of a sudden people think it reflects poorly on you as a person if you accept any cash from your parents besides an inheritance? Makes no sense to me (assuming of course the parent has the wealth to share).
Paying for a wedding is essentially a dowry. Think about it.
Yes and so is paying for college but I don’t get why some people think it is embarrassing to have parents pay for those things
Anonymous wrote:My husband and I are in our 50s. When we got married in our 30s, neither of our parents planned to pay for our wedding and we would not have asked them to do so. Ultimately, my parents ended up contributing certain things. We paid for a lot ourselves. His parents invited more than 250 people so he basically told them if that was the kind of list they wanted, they need to contribute (our guest list was 450 total). My guess is we paid 50% and each set of parents contributed about 25%. We did cake and finger foods at the church for hundreds of people and then an actual party later that night that only about 85 people were invited to attend. The fact my in-laws wanted to invite their entire small town of 300 people is now hilarious, but was sort of annoying at the time.
I don’t even think about whether I will pay for my kid’s wedding. Fewer people are even bothering to get married. And we could be dead before she gets married. We will play it by ear.
Anonymous wrote:I had my youngest at 38. We have a ‘marriage fund’ for all DC. They can decide to use it for a wedding or a down payment on a house or something else. They know about it and it will be given at the time of their wedding or after 33 if they chose to do something else with that $. It will not be an enormous amount of $ but the cost of a reasonable wedding.
Anonymous wrote:
Paying for a wedding is essentially a dowry. Think about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For us older parents. I had my last kid 45.
If my kid gets married say 32 am I really expected at 77 to pay daughters wedding, throw baby showers and all that normal younger parent stuff.
I mean I will be in 80s when my kid has kids
At age 32, the adult child should be paying for their own wedding. Gen-X here, I got married at age 22, paid for 90% of my wedding with money I saved working while going to college (which my parents paid for). I didn't want them to have to pay for the wedding, however, they offered and paid for the food. By 32, I was fully immersed in my own career and family, had built a house from the ground up, has put myself through grad school, and was having a second child.
+1
Paid for own college, wedding, house - not that long ago!
Anonymous wrote:For us older parents. I had my last kid 45.
If my kid gets married say 32 am I really expected at 77 to pay daughters wedding, throw baby showers and all that normal younger parent stuff.
I mean I will be in 80s when my kid has kids
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For us older parents. I had my last kid 45.
If my kid gets married say 32 am I really expected at 77 to pay daughters wedding, throw baby showers and all that normal younger parent stuff.
I mean I will be in 80s when my kid has kids
At age 32, the adult child should be paying for their own wedding. Gen-X here, I got married at age 22, paid for 90% of my wedding with money I saved working while going to college (which my parents paid for). I didn't want them to have to pay for the wedding, however, they offered and paid for the food. By 32, I was fully immersed in my own career and family, had built a house from the ground up, has put myself through grad school, and was having a second child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No parent has to pay for the wedding of their children.
+1
Also, I would think most competent adults would be embarrassed for their parents to pay for a wedding, especially if the couple getting married has full time jobs.
I really don’t get this whole strain of “it’s embarrassing to pass wealth from parent to child before death”.
The whole point of a dowry was to pass wealth at marriage but all of a sudden people think it reflects poorly on you as a person if you accept any cash from your parents besides an inheritance? Makes no sense to me (assuming of course the parent has the wealth to share).
Paying for a wedding is basically a dowry. Think about it.
Yes and so is paying for college but I don’t get why some people think it is embarrassing to have parents pay for those things
Anonymous wrote:For us older parents. I had my last kid 45.
If my kid gets married say 32 am I really expected at 77 to pay daughters wedding, throw baby showers and all that normal younger parent stuff.
I mean I will be in 80s when my kid has kids
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No parent has to pay for the wedding of their children.
+1
Also, I would think most competent adults would be embarrassed for their parents to pay for a wedding, especially if the couple getting married has full time jobs.
I really don’t get this whole strain of “it’s embarrassing to pass wealth from parent to child before death”.
The whole point of a dowry was to pass wealth at marriage but all of a sudden people think it reflects poorly on you as a person if you accept any cash from your parents besides an inheritance? Makes no sense to me (assuming of course the parent has the wealth to share).
Paying for a wedding is essentially a dowry. Think about it.
Anonymous wrote:Wow, you’re a “late bloomer” to parenthood and you’re punishing your kid for it? What an absolute gem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No parent has to pay for the wedding of their children.
+1
Also, I would think most competent adults would be embarrassed for their parents to pay for a wedding, especially if the couple getting married has full time jobs.
I really don’t get this whole strain of “it’s embarrassing to pass wealth from parent to child before death”.
The whole point of a dowry was to pass wealth at marriage but all of a sudden people think it reflects poorly on you as a person if you accept any cash from your parents besides an inheritance? Makes no sense to me (assuming of course the parent has the wealth to share).
Paying for a wedding is essentially a dowry. Think about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No parent has to pay for the wedding of their children.
+1
Also, I would think most competent adults would be embarrassed for their parents to pay for a wedding, especially if the couple getting married has full time jobs.
I really don’t get this whole strain of “it’s embarrassing to pass wealth from parent to child before death”.
The whole point of a dowry was to pass wealth at marriage but all of a sudden people think it reflects poorly on you as a person if you accept any cash from your parents besides an inheritance? Makes no sense to me (assuming of course the parent has the wealth to share).