Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why have you not been to HR? Nobody should scream at anybody in a professional setting. Document, document, document...
Op here. My understanding is that it’s not illegal for a boss to be a jerk. It’s only illegal if they are bullying you for a protected reason. So him yelling at me for being an idiot is not protected, but if he called me a racial slur it would be.
I might be wrong. I did go to my leadership on this but they backed him 100% and tried to get me to resign and things have been bad for me ever since.
So say he is bullying you for being a women. Learn to stand up for yourself.
Op here. I mean, I think that is likely but how can I prove it? When I went to leadership about his bullying they didn’t believe that it happened at all. This guy kisses up and kicks down so they all think he’s a sweetheart.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why have you not been to HR? Nobody should scream at anybody in a professional setting. Document, document, document...
Op here. My understanding is that it’s not illegal for a boss to be a jerk. It’s only illegal if they are bullying you for a protected reason. So him yelling at me for being an idiot is not protected, but if he called me a racial slur it would be.
I might be wrong. I did go to my leadership on this but they backed him 100% and tried to get me to resign and things have been bad for me ever since.
So say he is bullying you for being a women. Learn to stand up for yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why have you not been to HR? Nobody should scream at anybody in a professional setting. Document, document, document...
Op here. My understanding is that it’s not illegal for a boss to be a jerk. It’s only illegal if they are bullying you for a protected reason. So him yelling at me for being an idiot is not protected, but if he called me a racial slur it would be.
I might be wrong. I did go to my leadership on this but they backed him 100% and tried to get me to resign and things have been bad for me ever since.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why have you not been to HR? Nobody should scream at anybody in a professional setting. Document, document, document...
Op here. My understanding is that it’s not illegal for a boss to be a jerk. It’s only illegal if they are bullying you for a protected reason. So him yelling at me for being an idiot is not protected, but if he called me a racial slur it would be.
I might be wrong. I did go to my leadership on this but they backed him 100% and tried to get me to resign and things have been bad for me ever since.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leave is an entitlement-whether someone is sick or having a mental health situation or something else-what difference does it make?
Well, obviously, it depends upon your organization's policies, but everywhere that I have worked had the policy that sick time is for when you or a child is actually sick. Not for "mental health" and not for "something else."
Taking sick time without actually being sick (unless your organization allows it) is fraud.
Why would you not take a vacation day instead?
Op here. Because it is mandatory and no one is allowed to take leave that day.
I’ve got such bad anxiety though that I have severe diarrhea. I’m sure I’ll be spending the morning on the toilet the day of the party. Is that a good enough reason to take sick time?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is her leave. She is entitled to take it.
You don't understand how sick time normally works. Companies offer employees sick time because they don't want sick employees coming to work to make everyone else sick. They normally expect employees to take fewer sick days than are offered. If a company offers, say, twenty sick days per year, it would (and should) be highly unusual for an employee to actually take all of that time, because few people are actually sick that much. Having X number of sick days does not equal entitlement to take X number of paid days off to do whatever. This is distinct from vacation time, which does convey entitlement to use that time as desired. That is why companies make that distinction.
This is such BS.
Anonymous wrote:It is her leave. She is entitled to take it.
You don't understand how sick time normally works. Companies offer employees sick time because they don't want sick employees coming to work to make everyone else sick. They normally expect employees to take fewer sick days than are offered. If a company offers, say, twenty sick days per year, it would (and should) be highly unusual for an employee to actually take all of that time, because few people are actually sick that much. Having X number of sick days does not equal entitlement to take X number of paid days off to do whatever. This is distinct from vacation time, which does convey entitlement to use that time as desired. That is why companies make that distinction.
Anonymous wrote:It is her leave. She is entitled to take it.
You don't understand how sick time normally works. Companies offer employees sick time because they don't want sick employees coming to work to make everyone else sick. They normally expect employees to take fewer sick days than are offered. If a company offers, say, twenty sick days per year, it would (and should) be highly unusual for an employee to actually take all of that time, because few people are actually sick that much. Having X number of sick days does not equal entitlement to take X number of paid days off to do whatever. This is distinct from vacation time, which does convey entitlement to use that time as desired. That is why companies make that distinction.
Anonymous wrote:Why have you not been to HR? Nobody should scream at anybody in a professional setting. Document, document, document...
Anonymous wrote:5 years for retirement to vest def sounds like government.
You just gotta grind OP. This will be in the rear view soon. Are there things you can look forward to each week?