Anonymous wrote:Vivek is the smartest guy on stage.
Anonymous wrote:With any of these people in power, Canada will want the US to build a wall.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Finally! A Republican says that if you are pro-life, it has to cover the whole life, not just in the womb.
Points to Chris Christie for highlighting the party’s hypocrisy on this point. (Another obstacle to MAGAS supporting him!)
I have long wanted a journalist to confront so-called “right to lifers” to reveal their stance on the death penalty!!
You do know that the death penalty... is for violent criminals, right? Wow.
Violent criminals…who are alive.
So, if you are PRO-LIFE..,
Anonymous wrote:Tonight's debate made me actually wonder of Vivek is a bought and paid for agent of Russia. There's simply no other explanation.
Calling Zelensky, who is a jew, and "nazi" - that's unquestionably putin talk. Trying to "educate" the audience that most of occupied ukraine has been part of Russia since 2014, so what's the problem? That's like straight out of the Russian propaganda machine.
What gives??
Anonymous wrote:Vivek is the smartest guy on stage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vivek is the smartest guy on stage.
A smart person would recognize Vivek to be a loon.
Anonymous wrote:Vivek is the smartest guy on stage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The moderators did a great job maintaining control/decorum!
Except they did a lousy/non-existent joob of fact checking or calling out the lying.
Can they really do that without appearing biased!
Ah yes facts are biased now, I forgot.
They would have to decide when to interject, on the fly. Very hard to do.
Yet generations of journalists were able to do that until a couple of cycles ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The moderators did a great job maintaining control/decorum!
Except they did a lousy/non-existent joob of fact checking or calling out the lying.
Can they really do that without appearing biased!
Ah yes facts are biased now, I forgot.
They would have to decide when to interject, on the fly. Very hard to do.