Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not be excited about my salary going to my inlaws. Not that I would discount the idea of helping them if necessary, but within limits.
+1
There is nearly a 0% chance I want to spend money on my ILs care. I suggest to liquidate all their assets and use their assets to pay for their care. Same for my parents.
Plus, what kind of selfish person doesn't plan their own retirement/ care and thinks their own children are a retirement plan So strange to me. The kids should absolutely oversee the care and quality. But pay for? No way!
Pretty much everyone in some cultures.
DP. I always see these references and they just seem inaccurate. For one, I have a lot of East Asian friends and what I see is that their parents will scrimp and save to help them get through school with no loans and when they have kids will at a minimum take care of the baby full time for the first 100 days and frequently up until school age. So the cultural expectation isn’t just that the elderly parents get all their expenses paid for in old age. In contrast, my
White in-laws could give a rats ass about their parents other than to collect an inheritance (never called, didn’t attend their funerals), did not pay for DH’s college, have never watched our children or even know their birthdays, and now it’s “well in some cultures everyone takes care of their elders.”
Anonymous wrote:Surprise, surprise, the biggest advocates on here of husbands paying for their inlaws are all the sahms who never earned a dollar of the money. Ladies, if your parents are making minimum wage, perhaps you shouldn't stop working. Perhaps you shouldn't expect your husband to work a couple extra years in retirement (long after your kids are gone and you're going to pilates every day) so that your parents have medical care.
The easy way to have avoided this awkward discussion is simply for either the inlaws or the OP to have worked, like everyone else who doesn't have enough money saved for their own needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I do think everyone has a responsibility to plan for their own retirement both DH and I would feel deeply uncomfortable living a luxurious lifestyle while either of of mothers lived in poverty and without adequate care.
Not having a private, full-time nurse is not living in poverty and without adequate care.
I think OP said a nurse, aid, or nursing home., I don’t think she is far down this path. It sounds like she is just freaking out.
Maybe. I think the thing that jumps out to me though is that rather than investigate what her parents can qualify for /afford and then meeting any shortfall the response is a tantrum about how the marital funds are not truly equal. My grandmother needed a very high level of care for over a decade because of dementia but no other health problems (made more expensive because she became aggressive as well). It was literally millions of dollars. Having to have a conversation with your spouse about starting on the path to that is not unreasonable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I do think everyone has a responsibility to plan for their own retirement both DH and I would feel deeply uncomfortable living a luxurious lifestyle while either of of mothers lived in poverty and without adequate care.
Not having a private, full-time nurse is not living in poverty and without adequate care.
I think OP said a nurse, aid, or nursing home., I don’t think she is far down this path. It sounds like she is just freaking out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I do think everyone has a responsibility to plan for their own retirement both DH and I would feel deeply uncomfortable living a luxurious lifestyle while either of of mothers lived in poverty and without adequate care.
Not having a private, full-time nurse is not living in poverty and without adequate care.
Anonymous wrote:If my DH’s parents really needed money - even if it was due to their bad choices - I would never leave them high and dry. I would also step up to help care for them if need be. I’ve always been of the belief that families should take care of their elderly relatives and I consider my in-laws part of my family. I admire cultures that have that ethos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not be excited about my salary going to my inlaws. Not that I would discount the idea of helping them if necessary, but within limits.
+1
There is nearly a 0% chance I want to spend money on my ILs care. I suggest to liquidate all their assets and use their assets to pay for their care. Same for my parents.
Plus, what kind of selfish person doesn't plan their own retirement/ care and thinks their own children are a retirement plan So strange to me. The kids should absolutely oversee the care and quality. But pay for? No way!
Pretty much everyone in some cultures.
Anonymous wrote:While I do think everyone has a responsibility to plan for their own retirement both DH and I would feel deeply uncomfortable living a luxurious lifestyle while either of of mothers lived in poverty and without adequate care.