Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, no boundary change. Can we house some migrant family in your million dollar house?
I am sure that everyone with a “no human is illegal” yard sign, bumper sticker or tee shirt will agree to this deal.
Anonymous wrote:The whole
county needs to be scrutinized and re-aligned thoughtfully.
Anonymous wrote:Won’t Marshall be over capacity as well with all the Tyson’s buildup? There is no room to expand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The board stopped working on plans for countywide boundary changes before the last election but they are back at it.
Looks like the current CIP lists Herndon’s capacity at 2,744 students though the previous post renovation number in the last CIP was 2500.
That makes current usage at 84% rather than the previous 94%.
This is just one example of probable messing with the numbers to justify a fruit basket turnover across the county.
Look at the minutes from the recent FCAP meeting, they discussed the new superintendent’s interest in a boundary change as well as the importance of boundary policy.
Remember what they wanted to do in 2019?
Why are you afraid, OP?
Has the school board explained the capacity difference?
Did staff not do their math correctly the first time and not a single employee caught it? How many other schools have their capacities recorded incorrectly?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The board stopped working on plans for countywide boundary changes before the last election but they are back at it.
Looks like the current CIP lists Herndon’s capacity at 2,744 students though the previous post renovation number in the last CIP was 2500.
That makes current usage at 84% rather than the previous 94%.
This is just one example of probable messing with the numbers to justify a fruit basket turnover across the county.
Look at the minutes from the recent FCAP meeting, they discussed the new superintendent’s interest in a boundary change as well as the importance of boundary policy.
Remember what they wanted to do in 2019?
Why are you afraid, OP?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you trying to say they'll move Langley families to Herndon or Oakton families? Either way, they'll get a LOT of pushback. I didn't spend a million plus dollars on my house only to get rezoned to a shitty school.
It's more like when they bump up Herndon's reported post-renovation capacity from 2500 to 2744 the next year with no explanation, they invite Republicans to imply before an election that there must be some plan afoot to move kids to Herndon from Langley, etc. by the Democrats if they get re-elected.
Am I saying they will do so? Absolutely not.
P.S. - If you're trying to pass yourself off as a Langley parent worried about getting rezoned to a "shitty school," you need to say you spent several million dollars on your house, not some paltry "million plus dollars."
Did you know that there are million dollar homes zoned to Westfields, South Lakes, Oakton, Chantilly, even Herndon High? Great Falls isn't the only city with expensive houses in this region, PP.
Anonymous wrote:If boundaries change, do kids switch schools the next year or do they continue at their current school until the terminal year for that school?
Two in my small neighborhood in McLean did just that. One has an Afghan family living with them and one has a Ukrainian family living with them.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, no boundary change. Can we house some migrant family in your million dollar house?
I am sure that everyone with a “no human is illegal” yard sign, bumper sticker or tee shirt will agree to this deal.
Anonymous wrote:Are you trying to say they'll move Langley families to Herndon or Oakton families? Either way, they'll get a LOT of pushback. I didn't spend a million plus dollars on my house only to get rezoned to a shitty school.
Anonymous wrote:The board stopped working on plans for countywide boundary changes before the last election but they are back at it.
Looks like the current CIP lists Herndon’s capacity at 2,744 students though the previous post renovation number in the last CIP was 2500.
That makes current usage at 84% rather than the previous 94%.
This is just one example of probable messing with the numbers to justify a fruit basket turnover across the county.
Look at the minutes from the recent FCAP meeting, they discussed the new superintendent’s interest in a boundary change as well as the importance of boundary policy.
Remember what they wanted to do in 2019?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, no boundary change. Can we house some migrant family in your million dollar house?
I am sure that everyone with a “no human is illegal” yard sign, bumper sticker or tee shirt will agree to this deal.
The two are not mutually exclusive. Sorry, they're not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, no boundary change. Can we house some migrant family in your million dollar house?
I am sure that everyone with a “no human is illegal” yard sign, bumper sticker or tee shirt will agree to this deal.
Anonymous wrote:Okay, no boundary change. Can we house some migrant family in your million dollar house?