Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High school should not start before 8 am.
Follow the science, people!
College classes start at 8 am. How do you expect high schoolers to be preppy for that if they’ve never had to do that before?
Tell them not to sign up for 8 am classes.
Right. Because that’s always an option. You people are unserious.
No, you're just stuck in 1960. I work in higher ed. It basically is ALWAYS an option. If it isn't, the kid will figure it out and make it work. They don't need four years of "prepping" to potentially wake up for a class that might not ever happen for them. You are an "unserious" person.
So why can they "figure it out" in college when they 18, but not when they're in high school when they're 18? Make it make sense.
Are you just stupid? Not all high schoolers are 18.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High school should not start before 8 am.
Follow the science, people!
College classes start at 8 am. How do you expect high schoolers to be preppy for that if they’ve never had to do that before?
Tell them not to sign up for 8 am classes.
Right. Because that’s always an option. You people are unserious.
No, you're just stuck in 1960. I work in higher ed. It basically is ALWAYS an option. If it isn't, the kid will figure it out and make it work. They don't need four years of "prepping" to potentially wake up for a class that might not ever happen for them. You are an "unserious" person.
So why can they "figure it out" in college when they 18, but not when they're in high school when they're 18? Make it make sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High school should not start before 8 am.
Follow the science, people!
College classes start at 8 am. How do you expect high schoolers to be preppy for that if they’ve never had to do that before?
Tell them not to sign up for 8 am classes.
Right. Because that’s always an option. You people are unserious.
No, you're just stuck in 1960. I work in higher ed. It basically is ALWAYS an option. If it isn't, the kid will figure it out and make it work. They don't need four years of "prepping" to potentially wake up for a class that might not ever happen for them. You are an "unserious" person.
This was 2001. UMD. Nice try tho.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the busses. If I were in charge, I would only provide bus service for special Ed and ES and for secondary students who live more than a one mile walk to a Ride-On bus (which students ride for free anyway). This would end the excuse that we don’t have enough buses to have our schools all start at 9:30.
Bring back HS Plus and use it to run school from 3-7 PM for students who are struggling with class before 9 AM.
In addition, juniors and seniors need more online options. That would allow those who need or wish to have 3/4 or 1/2 day in person.
What is HS Plus?
Anonymous wrote:The amount of money wasted by MCPS on useless initiatives that go nowhere. They could easily find the money for buses if they stopped throwing away money at stuff like Leader in me.
Anonymous wrote:Adolescence extends well into the 20s so in all seriousness colleges should be looking at later start times too. But this isn't about colleges, it's about what's best for K-12 students. Forcing them to get up early isn't "preparing" them for anything but is having very real impacts to their mental health and performance in school. Calling anyone unserious because they're following the science while you effectively yell "get off my lawn" speaks volumes about who is being serious.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High school should not start before 8 am.
Follow the science, people!
College classes start at 8 am. How do you expect high schoolers to be preppy for that if they’ve never had to do that before?
Tell them not to sign up for 8 am classes.
Right. Because that’s always an option. You people are unserious.
No, you're just stuck in 1960. I work in higher ed. It basically is ALWAYS an option. If it isn't, the kid will figure it out and make it work. They don't need four years of "prepping" to potentially wake up for a class that might not ever happen for them. You are an "unserious" person.
So why can they "figure it out" in college when they 18, but not when they're in high school when they're 18? Make it make sense.
Anonymous wrote:The main issue is the busses. If I were in charge, I would only provide bus service for special Ed and ES and for secondary students who live more than a one mile walk to a Ride-On bus (which students ride for free anyway). This would end the excuse that we don’t have enough buses to have our schools all start at 9:30.
Bring back HS Plus and use it to run school from 3-7 PM for students who are struggling with class before 9 AM.
In addition, juniors and seniors need more online options. That would allow those who need or wish to have 3/4 or 1/2 day in person.
Anonymous wrote:Lack of buses and parking for them ounds like a relatively straightforward budgetary allocation issue to solve. What's taking so long?Anonymous wrote:What OP? It's not about practices. It's about the buses.
If MCPS had unlimited money and buses everyone would be starting at the same time like many private schools.
They reuse the buses and bus drivers for multiple routes so one bus driver might drive elementary, middle and high schools on one day. There was a movement to move HS to the late start date and elementary to early but some people were worried about getting elementary school kids to the bus in the dark.
My siblings have kids in smaller school districts with little traffic between schools and all levels of school start at around 8:20.
Anonymous wrote:Adolescence extends well into the 20s so in all seriousness colleges should be looking at later start times too. But this isn't about colleges, it's about what's best for K-12 students. Forcing them to get up early isn't "preparing" them for anything but is having very real impacts to their mental health and performance in school. Calling anyone unserious because they're following the science while you effectively yell "get off my lawn" speaks volumes about who is being serious.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High school should not start before 8 am.
Follow the science, people!
College classes start at 8 am. How do you expect high schoolers to be preppy for that if they’ve never had to do that before?
Tell them not to sign up for 8 am classes.
Right. Because that’s always an option. You people are unserious.
No, you're just stuck in 1960. I work in higher ed. It basically is ALWAYS an option. If it isn't, the kid will figure it out and make it work. They don't need four years of "prepping" to potentially wake up for a class that might not ever happen for them. You are an "unserious" person.
So why can they "figure it out" in college when they 18, but not when they're in high school when they're 18? Make it make sense.
Adolescence extends well into the 20s so in all seriousness colleges should be looking at later start times too. But this isn't about colleges, it's about what's best for K-12 students. Forcing them to get up early isn't "preparing" them for anything but is having very real impacts to their mental health and performance in school. Calling anyone unserious because they're following the science while you effectively yell "get off my lawn" speaks volumes about who is being serious.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High school should not start before 8 am.
Follow the science, people!
College classes start at 8 am. How do you expect high schoolers to be preppy for that if they’ve never had to do that before?
Tell them not to sign up for 8 am classes.
Right. Because that’s always an option. You people are unserious.
No, you're just stuck in 1960. I work in higher ed. It basically is ALWAYS an option. If it isn't, the kid will figure it out and make it work. They don't need four years of "prepping" to potentially wake up for a class that might not ever happen for them. You are an "unserious" person.
So why can they "figure it out" in college when they 18, but not when they're in high school when they're 18? Make it make sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High school should not start before 8 am.
Follow the science, people!
College classes start at 8 am. How do you expect high schoolers to be preppy for that if they’ve never had to do that before?
Tell them not to sign up for 8 am classes.
Right. Because that’s always an option. You people are unserious.
No, you're just stuck in 1960. I work in higher ed. It basically is ALWAYS an option. If it isn't, the kid will figure it out and make it work. They don't need four years of "prepping" to potentially wake up for a class that might not ever happen for them. You are an "unserious" person.
So why can they "figure it out" in college when they 18, but not when they're in high school when they're 18? Make it make sense.