I wonder if teachers are now discouraged to answer emails after 6 (should be outside work hours) because emails have a time stamp that clearly communicates that the teacher is working more than 40 hours a week and is easily visible to the public. Grading and lesson planning (depending on how you do it) is not easily trackable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah she thinks that asking teachers to refrain from emails “after 6pm”
Thing is that most teachers duty day ends at 3. Soooo this means nothing and is kind of insulting.

Let's not insult the staff at 120+ elementary schools whose school days don't end until at or before 3 PM.

This is DCUM. We insult everyone for anything.

Anonymous wrote:Yeah she thinks that asking teachers to refrain from emails “after 6pm”
Thing is that most teachers duty day ends at 3. Soooo this means nothing and is kind of insulting.

Let's not insult the staff at 120+ elementary schools whose school days don't end until at or before 3 PM.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she's emailing staff, does that mean she's back? Does she still have an interim covering for her?

I wondered about that too. If you are on medical leave, stay on medical leave. For her own sake, she needs to unplug.

The pastors prayed over her. She is all better.

Beyond unnecessary. What the hell.

Why is prayer unneccesary?

It's not the prayer. It's the fact that the person who made the original comment about the pastors was being cheek-in-tongue. The Black pastors supporting her is a common theme to detract her on this forum.

You mean tongue in cheek and no, it was not. It was a fact. They already did that last week.