Anonymous wrote:I'm feeling burnt out from working and just want to retire to pursue my hobbies. Maybe I'll try freelancing, but that sounds more stressful than an office job in many ways. What's the smallest nest egg you'd feel comfortable retiring on?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One spouse retiring early has caused resentment in our marriage. We regret it. YMMV.
Is the retired spouse much older? Have a particularly stressful job? Make most of the nest egg? If so, the resentment may be unwarranted.
If said “retired” spouse is 35 years old like op I’d think the resentment is warranted, regardless of whether they are older than their partner/in a stressful job.
I wasn’t responding to OP. Yes, retiring at 35 without your spouse’s approval isn’t cool. Marriage is teamwork.
OTOH working just to work when you can retire isn't cool. Marriage is teamwork.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP was not talking about retirement; they were talking about quitting work while their spouse keeps working. That's not the same thing.
Is it only retirement if spouses retire together? I’ve never heard that definition.
Quitting work at 35 to rely on spouse's income is also a stretch from the definition of retirement.
+1
I essentially did what OP is proposing when DH got a big promotion, and yes I had built up a healthy nest egg, but I would hardly call it retiring.
+2 Nothing wrong with being a SAHM (I'm one), but stopping working at age 35 isn't retirement.
What would you call it if you don’t have kids at home? It’s certainly not SAHM.
I think this is a good example of what MMM calls “the internet retirement police”.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP was not talking about retirement; they were talking about quitting work while their spouse keeps working. That's not the same thing.
Is it only retirement if spouses retire together? I’ve never heard that definition.
Quitting work at 35 to rely on spouse's income is also a stretch from the definition of retirement.
+1
I essentially did what OP is proposing when DH got a big promotion, and yes I had built up a healthy nest egg, but I would hardly call it retiring.
+2 Nothing wrong with being a SAHM (I'm one), but stopping working at age 35 isn't retirement.
What would you call it if you don’t have kids at home? It’s certainly not SAHM.
I think this is a good example of what MMM calls “the internet retirement police”.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP was not talking about retirement; they were talking about quitting work while their spouse keeps working. That's not the same thing.
Is it only retirement if spouses retire together? I’ve never heard that definition.
Quitting work at 35 to rely on spouse's income is also a stretch from the definition of retirement.
+1
I essentially did what OP is proposing when DH got a big promotion, and yes I had built up a healthy nest egg, but I would hardly call it retiring.
+2 Nothing wrong with being a SAHM (I'm one), but stopping working at age 35 isn't retirement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP was not talking about retirement; they were talking about quitting work while their spouse keeps working. That's not the same thing.
Is it only retirement if spouses retire together? I’ve never heard that definition.
Quitting work at 35 to rely on spouse's income is also a stretch from the definition of retirement.
+1
I essentially did what OP is proposing when DH got a big promotion, and yes I had built up a healthy nest egg, but I would hardly call it retiring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP was not talking about retirement; they were talking about quitting work while their spouse keeps working. That's not the same thing.
Is it only retirement if spouses retire together? I’ve never heard that definition.
Quitting work at 35 to rely on spouse's income is also a stretch from the definition of retirement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP was not talking about retirement; they were talking about quitting work while their spouse keeps working. That's not the same thing.
Is it only retirement if spouses retire together? I’ve never heard that definition.
Anonymous wrote:OP was not talking about retirement; they were talking about quitting work while their spouse keeps working. That's not the same thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[youtube]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am 50 and have 2 million in 401k, 200k Roth and 300k in non-retirement accounts.
DH is 58 and has similar assets, so about 5m total. Paid off home.
250k in 529 for 2 kids 14 and 19.
No family money and no pension.
I am thinking of quiting every day while DH wants to wait till younger DS graduate HS.
We have similar stats but we are a bit younger and our kids are a lot younger. (Had them late in life.) DH is fed, will have a pension, and wants to retire as soon as he is eligible in a couple of years. I am the main breadwinner and want to wait until the youngest graduates high school. My two reasons are: (1) being risk averse and (2) I want to instill good work ethic in my children and have them see us as being productive members of the society.
Not personal since so many people parrot this sentiment, but… what an absolutely asinine take this is. Really.
The first and most obvious logical error is assuming that any job done for pay is automatically good/productive/contributing to society. I whole heartedly reject that premise. Half of jobs are totally useless at best (meaning if those jobs disappeared tomorrow it wouldn’t natter to anyone but the former workers missing their paychecks!). A good chunk of jobs (even well paying ones) are by nature or in practice actively DETRIMENTAL to society. There are not a huge number of jobs that I think one should reasonably be PROUD of continuing to work in despite no longer needing the money.
I think it’s good to model for kids that loved ones come first, which includes their wants and needs, and if society wants to judge someone for retiring early and trying to enjoy their life, they can kick rocks.
Well, I do believe than our jobs are productive and good for the society. YMMV
Ahh I see. So good for society that your husband’s feelings don’t count. If my spouse had his own pension and his own 401(k) and wanted to retire as soon as he was eligible, I would feel like a horrible spouse telling him he can’t because I am “risk averse” or because I think he wouldn’t be setting a good example. YMMV 😉
Anonymous wrote:I would love to do the FIRE thing. I could comfortably live on $2k a month while healthy. The thing that keeps me from doing it is long term care. If you have enough money to cover a few years of assisted living, you do not need to live lean when healthy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One spouse retiring early has caused resentment in our marriage. We regret it. YMMV.
Is the retired spouse much older? Have a particularly stressful job? Make most of the nest egg? If so, the resentment may be unwarranted.
If said “retired” spouse is 35 years old like op I’d think the resentment is warranted, regardless of whether they are older than their partner/in a stressful job.
I wasn’t responding to OP. Yes, retiring at 35 without your spouse’s approval isn’t cool. Marriage is teamwork.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[youtube]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am 50 and have 2 million in 401k, 200k Roth and 300k in non-retirement accounts.
DH is 58 and has similar assets, so about 5m total. Paid off home.
250k in 529 for 2 kids 14 and 19.
No family money and no pension.
I am thinking of quiting every day while DH wants to wait till younger DS graduate HS.
We have similar stats but we are a bit younger and our kids are a lot younger. (Had them late in life.) DH is fed, will have a pension, and wants to retire as soon as he is eligible in a couple of years. I am the main breadwinner and want to wait until the youngest graduates high school. My two reasons are: (1) being risk averse and (2) I want to instill good work ethic in my children and have them see us as being productive members of the society.
Not personal since so many people parrot this sentiment, but… what an absolutely asinine take this is. Really.
The first and most obvious logical error is assuming that any job done for pay is automatically good/productive/contributing to society. I whole heartedly reject that premise. Half of jobs are totally useless at best (meaning if those jobs disappeared tomorrow it wouldn’t natter to anyone but the former workers missing their paychecks!). A good chunk of jobs (even well paying ones) are by nature or in practice actively DETRIMENTAL to society. There are not a huge number of jobs that I think one should reasonably be PROUD of continuing to work in despite no longer needing the money.
I think it’s good to model for kids that loved ones come first, which includes their wants and needs, and if society wants to judge someone for retiring early and trying to enjoy their life, they can kick rocks.
Well, I do believe than our jobs are productive and good for the society. YMMV