Anonymous wrote:
-DC purchases the Washington International School primary school campus next to Duke Ellington (it's not for sale). Allows expansion of Duke Ellington's building footprint and additional outdoor space appropriate to a general purpose HS.
.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Buying the building is fine, but the idea of moving MacArthur HS there now is nuttier than the original decision to put the school there in the first place. This idea - and the uncertainty it will create - will completely scuttle MacArthur for the foreseeable future and therefore J-R as well. It's really dumb stuff.
No it isn't. It makes zero sense to have an essentially private public school on the furthest west, non metro accessible corner of the city. That property can become the new elementary school so Hardy Park doesn't have to be developed.
It also makes zero sense to have two public high schools within a 5 minute drive. The location is great for those in Chevy Chase and Cathedral Heights, but it'd be a disaster for almost every in-boundary family in the Hardy feeder pattern. Hardy Park was never going to be touched by the Foxhall ES plans - that the park needed "saving" was a myth propagated by scurrilous NIMBYs who didn't want a public school anywhere near them. It's a shame that you apparently bought into it.
You would change the feeder pattern for J-R and this school into a form that would make more sense.
Anonymous wrote:But wait. Duke Ellington is a powerhouse for arts. Let it be.
We now need the 2nd K-12 that is a magnet and a shining example of what DCPS could be. And what better place than a failed private school to resurect quality public education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was shocked to see this from Frumin yesterday. I am a supporter of his but this is a terrible idea. One of his opponents in the election, Goulet who is now on the school board, basically ran on this idea and was defeated and criticized for it as presenting, among other things, a bad real estate deal. Now Frumin is promoting it? And suggesting we scuttle MacArthur school barely a month after its seemingly successful and good-start opening? Way to abandon MacArthur at a time it need support. This location is much too close to J-R to be viable as another HS without undermining J-R itself. And a complete distraction from pressing priorities. I hope he can find a way to detract this.
We’d rather see Matt Frumin spend his time to get school bus service from Ward 3 neighborhoods rezoned to MacArthur. It’s impractical to get to and from school by Metro bus now.
WMATA has proposed to add a new bus that would connect many of the in-boundary neighborhoods and two Metro stations to MacArthur HS. Guess who wrote a letter to WMATA asking them not to create the new line? Matt Frumin.
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?!
Anonymous wrote:Why not make the new K-12 a TJ of DC, or Duke Ellington of STEM and Humanities?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The idea of DC purchasing the property has merit. The idea that we should scuttle the MacArthur plan as it's being implemented, and hope that Lab School will go along with this plan, is asinine. As we've seen for years, the Lab School only cares about one thing: the Lab School and its wealthy benefactors (most of whom don't live in DC).
There's only so much DC can do with the Intelsat property if it bought it, because it has historic protection, for some stupid reason. So how about this: DC buys Intelsat and repurposes it into the new UDC.
As it stands now, the UDC campus is a hilarious misuse of that land; the area is a ghost town most of the time. By moving UDC to Intelsat, DC would get a huge parcel of land with more or less a blank slate. It could build schools, housing and retail on the property, right on top of a Metro station. It certainly would be a better use than the current UDC campus.
The Intelsat building is landmarked under historic preservation law. And the community will fight to keep the park, as will Frumin. So put aside your Smart Growth wet dream.
The park is part of the federal charter allowing the development of the rest of the parcel, so that won't change. Preservation protects the building, but a proposal of special merit can allow the city to do something different on the developable portion.