Anonymous wrote:If I were you OP, I would "reserve" Christmas for the grandparents and maybe a couple.lf gifts from Santa, if you do that, and pick another day as "Family Christmas" to give gifts from everyone else. Or even divide gift giving / celebrating up over several days during the holiday season.
That way the inflexible grandparents get to "win" this one thing they desperately want, while you, dh, and family celebrate Christmas at other times. Eventually the grandparents won't be able to travel, the kids will be older and not as cute, and that will be that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here--thanks for the input, all. (And I do enjoy being called both nasty and a doormat, lol.)
DH definitely is the messenger on all of this, though we discuss together before he engages. I think the real issue is that we've run out of productive ideas and know it's really in my ILs hands of how they want to deal with our preferences/requests. I'm
That said, I really like the "12 days of Christmas" frame! I admit having my kids wake up at home on Christmas morning is important to us, but I wonder if we could simply offer to fly to see them on the 26th or whatever for a few days before NYE. Seems like a simple solution that I should have thought of by now. Thanks!
It's a good plan to *generally* move toward visiting them just after Christmas. One recommendation I have is to not lock yourselves into a "we will always do it this way" framework given the rigidity it sounds like your inlaws bring to these discussions. Kids get older, jobs and schedules change, and what works now might now work in a few years.
This is a really good point, thank you. This has all been super helpful.
One thing I should likely make clear is that we have stood by our "nos" that I alluded to in my first post--it just doesn't seem to change behavior on their end after the temper tantrums that occur after the "no" is delivered. (We did, admittedly, screw up by not making the deal we should have after they booked tickets on their own.)
I was looking for alternative ideas for approaching, which I've definitely gotten here so thanks again! I also appreciate the folks who wonder why we'd tolerate such behavior more generally; the truth is that we just haven't hit the point of "cutting of ties" from our personal vantage point and hope to avoid that. We both know when it comes down to it, the ball is in their court but want to give as many options as possible to them that we could also live with.
There is a LOT of space between boundaries/ not being bullied by your ILs and cutting ties.
Anonymous wrote:I see a lot of evidence you’re both controlling. The Georgia cabin story on their side, but requiring preapproval for kids’ gifts on your side. Something to think about.
Anonymous wrote:It's their only holiday ask and their only set of grandchildren. What's wrong with you, OP?
Of course they can. But it's up to you if you meet that demand.Anonymous wrote:No one can "demand" something of you.
Sure, but has someone required you to do so?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see a lot of evidence you’re both controlling. The Georgia cabin story on their side, but requiring preapproval for kids’ gifts on your side. Something to think about.
Really? I'd always ask for parents' OK to buy any significant gift for their kid.
Anonymous wrote:I need to wean myself of DCUM. You are all so damned petty. I am so happy that none of my four adult daughters think or act like any of you. You’re all so damned spoiled, selfish and immature.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one day and you can’t be nice?
It’s one day. Why can’t the older generation be nice?
R - you can dig in your heels and are 100% in the right if you want to do so. And you probably should try to find a middle ground as Christmas isn't 4th July. But at the end of the day your IL's are part of your family and they are your kid's grandparents. And I don't think it's a terrible thing to model some level of deference to elderly relatives.
Anonymous wrote:My in-laws demand to have Christmas with us every year, and I really do mean demand. One year when we proposed getting together at Thanksgiving as opposed to Christmas due to some unavoidable business travel that was going to make the end of December stressful on our end, his parents accused us of intentionally hurting them and requested we put in writing that they would be able to come up for every Christmas in the future. (We did not do that because we both thought it was absolutely insane.)
DH isn't an only child, but he is the only one with kids. My ILs do not see any of their other kids for other holidays.
I do try to give them some grace because we live near my parents and they've seemed jealous of that relationship on occasion. On the other hand, they are objectively tough guests to host. Don't pick up after themselves, don't want to leave the house to go sightseeing or whatever with us, and have even booked their tickets without checking dates with us in advance some years. They've also ignored our requests to check with us before buying presents for the kids, which has caused some headaches to boot.
We've thought that maybe if we could find times to see them outside the stress of Christmas, it would make for a more comfortable visit around Christmas. But when we've asked to get together over the summer or what-have-you for a weekend, they've either ignored us or otherwise only attempted to do so on exclusively their terms. For example, one time my MIL booked a cabin in Georgia without checking the dates (or location) with us and then was mad that we couldn't make the trip work. And when I once asked if they'd like to make Easter a standing holiday where we'd all travel to them, etc. they told us they typically have other commitments that weekend so it wouldn't work for their schedules.
Otherwise, DH has tried talking to his parents but the conversations have not been productive. It all feels a bit exhausting. My husband and I both dread Christmas as a result, which kind of sucks, but we also want to make sure our kids have the opportunity to have a relationship with both sets of grandparents. DH and I have tried to figure out how to make this situation less of a PIA but have run out of ideas.
Has anyone navigated something like this before?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here--thanks for the input, all. (And I do enjoy being called both nasty and a doormat, lol.)
DH definitely is the messenger on all of this, though we discuss together before he engages. I think the real issue is that we've run out of productive ideas and know it's really in my ILs hands of how they want to deal with our preferences/requests. I'm
That said, I really like the "12 days of Christmas" frame! I admit having my kids wake up at home on Christmas morning is important to us, but I wonder if we could simply offer to fly to see them on the 26th or whatever for a few days before NYE. Seems like a simple solution that I should have thought of by now. Thanks!
It's a good plan to *generally* move toward visiting them just after Christmas. One recommendation I have is to not lock yourselves into a "we will always do it this way" framework given the rigidity it sounds like your inlaws bring to these discussions. Kids get older, jobs and schedules change, and what works now might now work in a few years.
This is a really good point, thank you. This has all been super helpful.
One thing I should likely make clear is that we have stood by our "nos" that I alluded to in my first post--it just doesn't seem to change behavior on their end after the temper tantrums that occur after the "no" is delivered. (We did, admittedly, screw up by not making the deal we should have after they booked tickets on their own.)
I was looking for alternative ideas for approaching, which I've definitely gotten here so thanks again! I also appreciate the folks who wonder why we'd tolerate such behavior more generally; the truth is that we just haven't hit the point of "cutting of ties" from our personal vantage point and hope to avoid that. We both know when it comes down to it, the ball is in their court but want to give as many options as possible to them that we could also live with.